REG Study Group Q1 2016 - Page 35

Viewing 15 replies - 511 through 525 (of 1,064 total)
  • Author
    Replies
  • #748341
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Let's say this example is current, calendar tax year of 2015:
    Paid- 12/31/2015
    Filed – 04/01/2016
    Due Date – 04/15/2016 (The latest of the three)*

    The latest you can file the amendment (3 yrs from *) is 04/15/2019
    3 yrs – 2017, 2018, >>>>>> 2019
    3 mos – Jan, Feb, >>>> March
    + 15 days >>> Boom April 15, 2019

    #748342
    ahugemistake
    Participant

    Wow that was so simple, I think I should take a lunch break haha

    FAR - 78*
    AUD - 66, 79
    REG - 73, 76
    BEC - 79

    #748343
    rosecpa
    Participant

    AmorD, you really have your stuff down pat! I would almost bet that you'll pass 🙂

    could you past a summary of the standards (percentage wise) including the realistic possibility and any other terms that are likely to be used.

    And I'm just curious, when are you scheduled for?

    #748344
    rosecpa
    Participant

    And just for clarification- is there any difference between realistic possibility and “more likely than not?

    #748345
    ahugemistake
    Participant

    @rosecpa

    hope this helps you:

    The reasonable basis standard comprehends at least a 20 percent probability of being sustained, while the more likely than not (more than 50 percent probability), substantial authority (40 percent probability), and realistic possibility (33 percent probability) are higher standards.

    FAR - 78*
    AUD - 66, 79
    REG - 73, 76
    BEC - 79

    #748346
    ahugemistake
    Participant

    Also just in case anyone is in here who has taken the exam in january should I be trying to memorize things like the Section 179 expense deduction from 2014 or just remember the 2015 one for now?

    FAR - 78*
    AUD - 66, 79
    REG - 73, 76
    BEC - 79

    #748347
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    <20% ………NOT FRIVOLOUS => Merely arguable; Patently improper; No defense to penalties
    20-33%……REASONABLE BASIS => If disclosed, avoid penalty
    33-50%……SUBSTANTIAL AUTHORITY => Avoid penalties, even if undisclosed, EXCEPT for tax shelters
    ………………..Tax Shelters = Listed Transactions which include Tax Avoidance & Tax Evasion
    >50% ………MORE LIKELY THAN NOT [MLTN] = Avoid penalties, even most tax shelters
    ………………..MLTN = REALISTIC POSSIBILITY OF SUCCESS [RPOS]
    ………………..Under RPOS, you have a CASE
    ………………..C => Covered Opinions
    ………………..A => Avoidance (Tax Avoidance)
    ………………..S => Shelter (Tax Shelters)
    ………………..E => Evasion (Tax Evasion)

    #748348
    nib
    Participant

    hello,

    I founds following 2 mcq s ,

    1)The definition of “realistic possibility” =
    mathematical approach is “the chances of the position being upheld must be better than one out of two.”

    2) CPA can be an advocate for the client if the CPA has reason to believe that a tax return position has a realistic possibility of being sustained on its merits at an administrative or judicial level.

    #748349
    pracap
    Participant

    Hi All,

    Am having tough time in understanding the following –
    confused with C corp, S corp and Partnership –
    1. Formation – basis and gain/loss
    2. distribution (nonliquidating & Liquidating) – basis and gain/loss

    Has anybody made a comparison between the 3 entities with regard to formation and distribution?

    thanks in advance

    #748350
    mcohen1993
    Participant

    Got an 81% on the first Becker Final Exam. However I did about a 79% on the MC and an 85% on the Sims. The Sims seemed laugably easy though. Am I still in good shape? My test is this Friday.

    REG: 91!!
    BEC: 80!!
    AUD: TBA
    FAR: TBA

    In the order I plan to take the exams.

    #748351
    ahugemistake
    Participant

    Sally Markey, who owns a heavy construction company, decided to spend some of her $2,000,000 2014 profit on five heavy-duty diesel truck costing $555,000 for her business. In order to lower her income taxes for the year, she decided to take the maximum Section 179 deduction plus the MACRS depreciation for 7-year property. The ceiling for Section 179 in 2014 is $500,000. No other capital assets were purchased during 2014. What is the total deduction for the truck in 2014?

    A.
    $503,930

    B.
    $531,430

    C.
    $500,000

    D.
    $527,500

    Sally Markey took the largest Section 179 deduction available in 2014, $500,000.

    Equipment purchases: $555,000
    Section 179 deduction: 500,000
    Bonus depreciation deduction: 27,500
    1st-year depreciaton ($27,500 × .1429): 3,930
    Total 1st-year deduction: $531,430

    The correct answer is B, but I feel like they might have missed some details in the question, where did the bonus depreciation come from? Unless I'm missing something.

    FAR - 78*
    AUD - 66, 79
    REG - 73, 76
    BEC - 79

    #748352
    ahugemistake
    Participant

    @mchoen seems like you're in good shape, just keep drilling MCQs and practicing flashcards. goodluck!

    FAR - 78*
    AUD - 66, 79
    REG - 73, 76
    BEC - 79

    #748353
    rosecpa
    Participant

    John Thayer purchased an apartment building eight years ago, for $200,000. The building was depreciated on the straight-line method. On December 31, year one, the building was sold for $220,000, when the asset balance net of accumulated depreciation was $170,000. On his year one tax return, Thayer should report:

    Section 1231 gain of $20,000 and ordinary income of $30,000.
    Section 1231 gain of $30,000 and ordinary income of $20,000.
    ordinary income of $50,000.
    Section 1231 gain of $50,000.
    ANSWER: The correct answer is D. Section 1231 gain of $50,000. The building is a Section 1231 asset. None of the gain is ordinary because the depreciation, or cost recovery, was under the straight-line method. (There was no excess over straight-line.)

    Selling price of building $220,000
    Adjusted basis of building (170,000)
    Realized Section 1231 gain $50,000

    My initial reaction was leading me to the first answer. How do you differentiate between when you use depreciation recapture as ordinary income, and when do you consider the entire gain above the basis as 1231 gain?

    #748354
    ahugemistake
    Participant

    Sec. 1250 recaptures gain as ordinary income to the extent of “excess” depreciation (i.e., depreciation deducted in excess of straight-line). The total gain less any depreciation recapture is Sec. 1231 gain. Since straight-line depreciation was used, there is no recapture under Sec. 1250.

    also found another helpful topic; https://www.another71.com/cpa-exam-forum/topic/reg-1250-and-291-depreciation-recapture

    I hate little rules like these because I'm scared i'd forget them on exam day.

    FAR - 78*
    AUD - 66, 79
    REG - 73, 76
    BEC - 79

    #748355
    rosecpa
    Participant

    Thank you, that was quick and easy!

Viewing 15 replies - 511 through 525 (of 1,064 total)
  • The topic ‘REG Study Group Q1 2016 - Page 35’ is closed to new replies.