REG Study Group Q1 2016 - Page 22

Viewing 15 replies - 316 through 330 (of 1,064 total)
1 2 3 … 21 22 23 … 69 70 71
  • Author
    Replies
  • January 8, 2016 at 11:32 am #748146
    Pandarama
    Participant

    @ohio – have you tried just looking up on google partnership basis and corporation basis? Usually when I have issues on a topic, I use other websites that might have some additional information stated slightly different to get me to understand it. Or youtube videos of the topic where teachers walk you through a problem.

    BEC - 80
    AUD - 64, 75 - credit lost, 90!!
    REG - 73, 74, 83
    FAR - 61, 72, 85

    Feels good finishing on my best note. Time to watch the mailbox.

    January 8, 2016 at 12:12 pm #748147
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Thank you guys for all your help. I appreciate it, really.
    @Pandarama, Ohio aced REG with a 90. She was just trying to coach me with my difficulty getting all the stock/tax bases straight.

    January 8, 2016 at 6:35 pm #748148
    mtaylo24
    Participant

    Am I the only one to re-schedule this window?

    AUD - 1st - 60 (12/12), 61 (2/13), 61 (8/13), 78! (11/15)
    REG - 55 (2/16) 69 (5/16) Retake(8/16)
    BEC - 71(5/16) Retake (9/16)
    FAR - (8/16)

    January 8, 2016 at 8:09 pm #748149
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    How much of the Dodd Frank is tested? It's such a boring read. A moderator in my review course said:

    “You don't need to know each of the titles. It will be sufficient to understand WHAT the Dodd Frank act is and what it generally encompasses/purpose.”

    Then I did a couple practice questions came up asking, “Which of the following is not one of the sections of the Dodd-Frank Act (Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010)?”

    and

    “Under Title IX of the Dodd Frank Act — Investors Protections and Improvements to the Regulation of Securities, stockholders are entitled to vote:”

    These questions sound contradictory to what the moderator said :sigh: Are certain titles more tested than the others? I know the JOBS Act will be tested too, right?

    January 8, 2016 at 9:22 pm #748150
    mtaylo24
    Participant

    Am I the only one to re-schedule this window?

    AUD - 1st - 60 (12/12), 61 (2/13), 61 (8/13), 78! (11/15)
    REG - 55 (2/16) 69 (5/16) Retake(8/16)
    BEC - 71(5/16) Retake (9/16)
    FAR - (8/16)

    January 8, 2016 at 9:23 pm #748151
    mtaylo24
    Participant

    Am I the only one to re-schedule this window?

    AUD - 1st - 60 (12/12), 61 (2/13), 61 (8/13), 78! (11/15)
    REG - 55 (2/16) 69 (5/16) Retake(8/16)
    BEC - 71(5/16) Retake (9/16)
    FAR - (8/16)

    January 8, 2016 at 9:23 pm #748152
    mtaylo24
    Participant

    Am I the only one to re-schedule this window?

    AUD - 1st - 60 (12/12), 61 (2/13), 61 (8/13), 78! (11/15)
    REG - 55 (2/16) 69 (5/16) Retake(8/16)
    BEC - 71(5/16) Retake (9/16)
    FAR - (8/16)

    January 8, 2016 at 9:23 pm #748153
    mtaylo24
    Participant

    Am I the only one to re-schedule this window?

    AUD - 1st - 60 (12/12), 61 (2/13), 61 (8/13), 78! (11/15)
    REG - 55 (2/16) 69 (5/16) Retake(8/16)
    BEC - 71(5/16) Retake (9/16)
    FAR - (8/16)

    January 8, 2016 at 9:23 pm #748154
    mtaylo24
    Participant

    Is this forum broke? Can't see my posts when logged out…

    AUD - 1st - 60 (12/12), 61 (2/13), 61 (8/13), 78! (11/15)
    REG - 55 (2/16) 69 (5/16) Retake(8/16)
    BEC - 71(5/16) Retake (9/16)
    FAR - (8/16)

    January 8, 2016 at 11:31 pm #748155
    ahugemistake
    Participant

    hey guys just a quick question: Do i need to memorize the phase out amounts for the exam, like this:

    Filing Status AGI—Beginning of Phaseout (2015) AGI Above Which Exemption Fully Phased Out (2015)
    Married Jointly $309,900 $432,400
    Head of Household $284,050 $406,550
    Single $258,250 $380,750

    FAR - 78*
    AUD - 66, 79
    REG - 73, 76
    BEC - 79

    January 8, 2016 at 11:41 pm #748156
    ahugemistake
    Participant

    @cantstopwontstop I see Dodd Frank as one of those topics that may have 1 MCQ. It's wise to look over it but I wouldn't spend time memorizing every detail of the various acts. I took BEC thinking this would be on it and memorized a bunch of stuff and wasn't even tested on it. Focus on what the moderator wants you to hit the hardest.

    FAR - 78*
    AUD - 66, 79
    REG - 73, 76
    BEC - 79

    January 8, 2016 at 11:53 pm #748157
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Do LEASE CONTRACTS need to be in writing just like land contracts? (From mnemonic MYLEGS)

    January 9, 2016 at 12:21 am #748158
    ahugemistake
    Participant

    @amor leases are covered under the Statute of Fraud:

    Statute of Frauds laws of most states require a lease of real estate for a term of more than one year to be in writing. However, an oral lease for a term of one year or less is binding and will be enforceable regarding most terms normally found in a lease. An oral lease can be amended orally.

    FAR - 78*
    AUD - 66, 79
    REG - 73, 76
    BEC - 79

    January 9, 2016 at 12:35 am #748159
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    @AHuge thanks.
    I thought the “L” from MYLEGS mnemonic stands for either/both LAND/LEASE.
    With that said, LEASE contracts are under “Y”, whose terms cannot be performed within a YEAR.

    January 9, 2016 at 12:41 am #748160
    ahugemistake
    Participant

    Sorry I really am not familiar with MYLEGS. I don't use Becker. Anything with a sale of real estate is required to be in writing always, but when you are leasing something for less than a year you can orally agree, and it would be enforceable.

    FAR - 78*
    AUD - 66, 79
    REG - 73, 76
    BEC - 79

  • Author
    Replies
Viewing 15 replies - 316 through 330 (of 1,064 total)
1 2 3 … 21 22 23 … 69 70 71
  • The topic ‘REG Study Group Q1 2016 - Page 22’ is closed to new replies.