REG Study Group Q1 2016 - Page 18

Viewing 15 replies - 256 through 270 (of 1,064 total)
  • Author
    Replies
  • #748086
    Claudia408
    Participant

    @CantStopWontStop – Haven't taken Reg at all yet, but yes the ones in his book don't really have calculations and seem easier than what I'm expecting. I think the SIMs are gonna be like M-1, AMT stuff.

    BEC - 75 (3x)
    AUD - 78 (3x)
    REG - 67, 66, Aug 1
    FAR - 54, Sept 8

    #748087
    marqzho
    Participant

    CantStopWontStop

    I am a roger user. I'd say the real exam format and difficulty level are similar to Roger's questions. But the thing is they test you on some minor areas, areas that you least expected 🙂

    REG 90
    FAR 95
    AUD 98
    BEC 84

    #748088
    Claudia408
    Participant

    @marqzho – when are you taking REG? let us know how it compares to Roger – harder, same, easier (DOUBT THAT!)

    BEC - 75 (3x)
    AUD - 78 (3x)
    REG - 67, 66, Aug 1
    FAR - 54, Sept 8

    #748089
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    I just couldn't comprehend this question. How are AT-RISK LOSSES related to RECOURSE LIABILITIES?

    With regard to S corporations and their stockholders, the “at risk” rules applicable to losses:

    a.
    Apply at the shareholder level rather than at the corporate level.

    b.
    Take into consideration the S corporation's ratio of debt to equity.

    c.
    Depend on the type of income reported by the S corporation.

    d.
    Are subject to the elections made by the S corporation's stockholders.

    Explanation

    Choice “a” is correct. The “at risk” rules apply at the shareholder level rather than at the corporate level.

    Rule: The “at risk” rules limit the deductibility of the distributive share of the losses of an S corporation to the amount the taxpayer has “at risk” (as opposed to non recourse loans) and could actually lose from an activity.

    Choice “c” is incorrect. The character (type) of an S corporation's income only affects the (type) character of flow through to stockholders.

    Choice “d” is incorrect. A far out distractor. The elections that affect the nature and timing of an S corporation income are made at the corporate level, not the shareholder level. The “at risk” provisions afford no elections.

    Choice “b” is incorrect. A far out distractor. The S corporation's ratio of debt to equity is only an indication of whether or not the corporation has been properly capitalized.

    #748090
    marqzho
    Participant

    Claudia408

    I took it Nov 2015.

    I'd say they are all similar in the difficulty level. There are questions that I can answer without a second thought. And there are also questions that I never gonna know the answers 🙂

    REG 90
    FAR 95
    AUD 98
    BEC 84

    #748091
    Claudia408
    Participant

    marqzho – did you pass? if so, what're you still doing on this forum on the regular!? lol … although we all appreciate you sharing your knowledge!

    BEC - 75 (3x)
    AUD - 78 (3x)
    REG - 67, 66, Aug 1
    FAR - 54, Sept 8

    #748092
    marqzho
    Participant

    Yes, I passed the REG lol. Now struggling with FAR.

    No kidding, I actually do it for fun. Some people watch movies, some people play video games. I hang around this forum and answer questions that other people have 🙂

    And this is by far the only useful thing I can do with me passing REG

    REG 90
    FAR 95
    AUD 98
    BEC 84

    #748093
    steph2014CPA
    Member

    guys help! are NINJA MCQ harder than Becker and CPA excel questions????

    I took a practice exam from CPAExcel and got a 70% (I was happy about this), took another one last week using Becker and got a 71! and have recently been scoring in the 70's and 80's using Becker and CPA excel…… but I took one of you guys' advice and purchased NINJA MCQ just to practice and these questions are crazy and I keep scoring high 60's….

    should I be worried? I feel like some go into so much detail…. exam is Wednesday

    FAR: 80
    AUD: 83
    BEC: 79
    REG: 56, 74, 74, January 6th

    #748094
    Claudia408
    Participant

    marqzho – since you're a roger user … do you know his Corp AMT mnemonic PILE & ACE?

    Are those additions or subtractions?

    BEC - 75 (3x)
    AUD - 78 (3x)
    REG - 67, 66, Aug 1
    FAR - 54, Sept 8

    #748095
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    @Claudia408 I have a feeling it'll be tested on those as well and calculation of estates and trusts

    @marqzho cosign with what @Claudia408 said about the difficulty of the SIMSs related to Roger's haha. Congrats on passing REG though

    #748096
    marqzho
    Participant

    Claudia408

    They usually a plus. So govt. can squeeze more $ out of you

    but some of the item could be a minus, like L – long term contract

    REG 90
    FAR 95
    AUD 98
    BEC 84

    #748097
    marqzho
    Participant

    CantStopWontStop

    I thought I failed right after the exam. The SIMS were not hard, but they were all on some minor topics. I never thought they would formula a SIM just on one single minor concept. And MCQ, I can answer 60% of them, 20% by good guess and 20% are questions I will never gonna know this answers 🙂

    REG 90
    FAR 95
    AUD 98
    BEC 84

    #748098
    marqzho
    Participant

    Amor

    If the loan is non-recourse, meaning the creditor can't go after the debtor personally in the event of default. Then this loan is not at-risk to the S/H.

    REG 90
    FAR 95
    AUD 98
    BEC 84

    #748099
    ahugemistake
    Participant

    A question for all using CPAExcel to prepare:

    I just started the federal taxation section of REG today, and I am noticing the videos for this section are extraordinarily long, while the questions are around 10 or so per chapter. In the past I have stuck to reading the slides, doing the questions in study mode and reading the explanations of the answers. I feel the slides in this section are not that good, and book text is even more detailed. I'm trying to figure out an efficient way of getting through this section, anyone have any tips?Thanks!

    FAR - 78*
    AUD - 66, 79
    REG - 73, 76
    BEC - 79

    #748100
    astreyamz
    Member

    @marqzho

    I have REG next Friday. I'm pretty confident on corporations, partnerships and individuals. I am gonna do more with Business Law, but I am at the point where I don't think my brain will handle more information on tax. I haven't done many simulations either. What all should I prepare for?

    Thanks!

Viewing 15 replies - 256 through 270 (of 1,064 total)
  • The topic ‘REG Study Group Q1 2016 - Page 18’ is closed to new replies.