REG Study Group – October/November 2012 - Page 2

  • Creator
    Topic
  • #173954
    jeff
    Keymaster

    Trying something new…

Viewing 15 replies - 16 through 30 (of 201 total)
  • Author
    Replies
  • #388013
    fnj_84
    Member

    @CPAski and @momto5 Thank you! It could be an old option on the SIMS.

    #388014

    @snemc889, thanks a lot for your help, but the information updated on 22 august 2011 will be tested in the October/November window ?

    #388015
    pia ach
    Member

    Hi ! I am planning to give my Reg in Jan 2013 using Wiley Exam review 2012 and Wiley problems and solutions 2012-13 .Should i purchase additional materials? Any advice?

    Finally done!!! Experience-pending. Ethics- Pending.
    Reg 78 / 73/82.
    Aud 74/89.
    BEC 72 /78.
    FAR 74/ 73/ 82.

    #388016
    sea2589
    Member

    how would this scenario regarding partnership basis be treated?

    Billy transferred prop with AB of 50 k and FMV of 30K to partnership for 30% interest. The partnership later sold the property for 65k when the AB was still at 50K.

    what is Billy's Gain or Loss as a result of the sale?

    Do i net the built-in loss with the now gain of 5k for Billy?

    #388017
    Sudad
    Member

    When Billy transfered the property to the partnership, the partnership owns it on the day of transfered not Billy. Basically, the gain on sale of $15,000 would increase the partners' basis based on their profit and loss agreement.

    DONE!!!

    #388018
    Sudad
    Member

    Opps, sorry! The total gain is not $15,000, it is $35,000 because the new basis of the property is the FMV at time of transfer. So, this 35K gain on sale will be distributed among the partners based on their P&L ratio. If Billy has 30% interest then his share on gain will be $10,500 (30%X35,000).

    DONE!!!

    #388019
    sonia324
    Member

    Regarding the question of contribution of property with built in loss

    when a partner contrbutes with a fmv that is lower than the adjusted basi a built in lost exist at the date of the contribution. upon the subequent sale of that property the built in loss is specially allocated to the contributed partner. therefore, you need to first allocated the amount to bill and then distributed equal to the partners.

    hope this helps!

    FIN - 77 (November, 2011)
    AUD - 80 (July, 2012)
    REG- (October, 2012)
    BEC -(November, 2012)

    #388020
    sonia324
    Member

    amount of built in loss to the partner and then distrubuted equal to the partners**

    FIN - 77 (November, 2011)
    AUD - 80 (July, 2012)
    REG- (October, 2012)
    BEC -(November, 2012)

    #388021
    Katydid
    Member

    Do any of you listen to podcasts related to tax to help reiterate some of the material? I found a website: taxtalktoday.com, its on iTunes as well. They discuss primarily individual tax info but I wanted to share the site just in case anyone was interested. Long podcasts: 1 1/2 hours + but they do discuss a lot of what's covered on the exam.

    I also found a general report on partnerships on lexis nexis: https://www.lexisnexis.com/lawschool/study/understanding/pdf/PshipTaxCh1.pdf

    B-74,84 (Expires 1/31/14)
    A-79 (Expires 7/31/13)
    R-72,83 (Expires 4/31/14)
    F-80 No more expiration worries, I'm Done!

    #388022
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    haha srope…. I've fully learned to accept “surprises” with this exam, especially after walking out of my last BEC exam. That thing came out of left field for me lol

    #388023
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    I am taking REG in 3 weeks (10/11) but I have taken off from work and can fully dedicate myself to studying over these 3 weeks. I started yesterday (R1) and am doing R2 tonight. Do you think this is doable? I am using Becker 2012

    Also does anyone that used Becker have any helpful notes or study guides they could send? Thanks and good luck to everyone studying!

    #388024
    OTW2CPA
    Member

    Acronym to remember some of the adjustments to arrive at AGI on individual tax return – MOHAWKS:

    M: moving expenses

    O: one half of self employment tax

    H: health insurance paid by self employed

    A: alimony paid

    W: withdrawal of savings penalty

    K: Keogh, IRA, SEP

    S: student loan interest, tuition, K-12 educator expenses

    I know this probably isn't a difficult subject for tax gurus but every little bit helps.

    FAR: 8/11 - 80
    BEC: 2/12 - 74, 5/12 - 80
    AUD: 8/12 - 79
    REG: 12/12 - 80

    **used Kaplan primarily
    *used Wiley study guide as supplement for BEC
    *used Ninja notes AUD and REG

    #388025
    momof4
    Member

    I've completed all of the Becker lectures and I have a month to practice questions, write Ninja notes, and review the partnership and corporate tax issues. I'm busting out of here this testing window.

    I can't thank the board enough for the 74.

    BEC 84
    FAR 80
    AUD 85
    REG 78

    #388026
    momof4
    Member

    srope

    I had considered testing October 1 as well but then I pushed it further out because we still won't get a score until Nov 5. Are you testing the first because the information will be fresher in your mind?

    BEC 84
    FAR 80
    AUD 85
    REG 78

    #388027
    sonia324
    Member

    If I take the exam Saturday October 20th, do you think we would get the score by November 5th?

    FIN - 77 (November, 2011)
    AUD - 80 (July, 2012)
    REG- (October, 2012)
    BEC -(November, 2012)

Viewing 15 replies - 16 through 30 (of 201 total)
  • The topic ‘REG Study Group – October/November 2012 - Page 2’ is closed to new replies.