REG Study Group October November 2017 - Page 38

  • Creator
    Topic
  • #1620148
    jeff
    Keymaster

    Welcome to the Q4 2017 CPA Exam Study Group for REG. 🙂

    Introduce yourselves and let your fellow NINJAs know when you plan to take your REG exam.

    The Five Steps (NINJA Framework): https://www.another71.com/pass-the-cpa-exam/

Viewing 15 replies - 556 through 570 (of 596 total)
  • Author
    Replies
  • #1672669
    mashloum
    Participant

    Can anyone advise which one is the right answer, I got confused since two different answers from two different resources!!

    Ninja as well Surgent answer is “C”
    Gleim and Lamvers answer is “A”

    Downs, Frey, and Vick formed the DFV general partnership to act as manufacturers' representatives. The partners agreed Downs would receive 40% of any partnership profits and Frey and Vick would each receive 30% of such profits. It was also agreed that the partnership would not terminate for five years. After the fourth year, the partners agreed to terminate the partnership. At that time, the partners' capital accounts were as follows: Downs, $20,000; Frey, $15,000; and Vick, $10,000. There also were undistributed losses of $30,000. If Frey died before the partnership terminated:

    Incorrect A. Downs and Vick, as a majority of the partners, would have been able to continue the partnership.
    B. the partnership would have continued until the 5-year term expired.
    C. the partnership would automatically dissolve.
    D. Downs and Vick would have Frey's interest in the partnership.

    You answered A. The correct answer is C.

    If Frey died before the partnership terminated, the partnership would automatically dissolve. Under the typical state partnership laws, death automatically dissolves a partnership. If the partners wanted to continue the partnership after the death of a partner, they can agree to form a new partnership.

    #1672879
    joonpark1212
    Participant

    QUESTION on C Corporation federal income tax adjustment. I saw a SIM question where it provides both federal income tax wittheld and federal income tax paid(income tax provision) and provides different numbers. When adjusting book income to taxable income, which one of the two numbers would have to be used?

    Most questions usually present one of the numbers but wondering which one to use when both are provided

    #1672895
    joonpark1212
    Participant

    If i may ask one more help on a question regards to including of gross estate.

    Does the proportion of the decendents interest in Joint held property by spouse(rights of survivorship), joint held property by nonspouse(rights of survivorship), tenancy in common(no rights of survivorship) all get included as GROSS ESTATE?

    #1672939
    56_Moves
    Member

    @mashloum
    Becker state the following “The death of a partnership does not cause a dissolution if the remaining partners agree to continue the partnership with in 90 days of the partner's death.”

    In this case the problem does not mention that the partners made such agreement so I believe the best answer would be C – The partnership would be dissolved.

    -Hope this helps.

    #1672945
    56_Moves
    Member

    Sorry, I meant the death of a partner.

    #1672949
    56_Moves
    Member

    @joonpark1212

    To answer your first question, I believe this problem would be related to a corporation that is keeping books on a cash basis. If this is true, then the taxes paid with the return for the prior year and the amount withheld for the current year would have been expended on the books and therefore both would need to be subtracted. If the corporation is reporting books on an accrual basis then there is not enough information as we would need to know how much the company allocated for federal income tax expense.

    -Hope this helps.

    #1672966
    mashloum
    Participant

    @56_Moves
    I search in Glei and there are bundle of question which indicates it will not dissolve more the disassociated

    thank you for your feedback

    #1672991
    mashloum
    Participant

    correction “Glei” = “Gleim”

    #1673105
    mardybum13
    Participant
    #1673141
    joonpark1212
    Participant

    @56_Moves after reading your post and going back to the material i was able to grasp the concept. Thanks a lot!

    I have two additional concept questions if anyone could share their thoughts.

    1. Would warranty cost be included in basis of a purchase? Is it a capital expenditure or is it an expense?

    2. Read somewhere that a depreciation recapture can happend in a likekind exchange. Would this be possible if a nonlikekind exchanged as boot is either a 1245 or 1250 property?

    Thanks in advance!

    #1673476
    56_Moves
    Member

    @jonpark1212

    Extended warranties are deferred expenses. The are required to be deducted over the life of the warranty. If I purchases a piece of equipment which comes with a 1 year warranty and I purchase an additional 2 years, then I would expense half of the warranty in year two and the other half in year three.

    -Hope this helps.

    #1673479
    CRAD4CPA
    Participant

    I took the exam today for the first time… I was confident going in, not so much going out.

    I do have one question – If A C corp is fully bought out by another company due to constant NOL's with a NOL carryover. Does the new company get to take the NOL carryovers? If so is it reduced by some tax figure? I can not find any solid info on this and would like to know for future knowledge.

    #1673654
    Lentilcounter
    Participant

    Question for those of you who have Becker. See below. This is from the Chapter 5 simulations.

    Taxpayer traded an old building (purchased 6 years ago) for a new building and fully depreciated personal property. NBV of the old building was $200,000 and FMV was $500,000. The FMV of the new building was $460,000 and the FMV of the fully depreciated personal property received with the new building was $40,000.

    The question asks you to input Proceeds, Basis, Gain or (Loss), Short- or Long-Term, Amount to be Reported on Tax Return

    These are my answers that seem to match up with the answer key but for whatever reason, Becker still says that one or more of my answers is wrong.

    Proceeds = $500K
    Basis = $200K
    Gain or Loss = $40K
    Short-Term/Long-Term/N/A = Long-Term
    Amount to be reported on tax return = $40K

    Thanks.

    BEC = 72 (6/08/16)
    FAR = ?
    REG = ?
    AUD = ?

    #1673686
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    @lentilcounter,

    I don't have Becker but is it possible proceeds = realized gain instead of amount realized ?

    Everything else looks right to me…

    #1673699
    Sturg
    Participant

    @CRAD4CPA, try IRC Section 382 for info on NOL's being transferred. It seems like it would be too “in the weeds” for CPA exam but I haven't taken REG yet so have no idea what to expect and not looking forward to it.

Viewing 15 replies - 556 through 570 (of 596 total)
  • The topic ‘REG Study Group October November 2017 - Page 38’ is closed to new replies.