REG Study Group October November 2017 - Page 12

  • Creator
    Topic
  • #1620148
    jeff
    Keymaster

    Welcome to the Q4 2017 CPA Exam Study Group for REG. 🙂

    Introduce yourselves and let your fellow NINJAs know when you plan to take your REG exam.

    The Five Steps (NINJA Framework): https://www.another71.com/pass-the-cpa-exam/

Viewing 15 replies - 166 through 180 (of 596 total)
  • Author
    Replies
  • #1642502
    Matt
    Participant

    I chalk it up to the amount of capital they both had at the time representing how much value they currently have in the company.

    We don't have information on how they all go they where they are capital wise, but it could be that smith has taken distribution before or that James contribution more or who knows what.

    What we can tell is that after deducting the liabilities and loss and the receivables/P&E the company has 58,000 worth of cash and allocating the loss tells us how it can be distributed.

    FAR 74

    #1642504
    Matt
    Participant

    Hey does anyone have any examples or explanations of the difference between ordinary negligence and negligent misrepresentation and gross negligence I have psuedo definitions

    Ordinary negligence- results from accountants act or failure to act in a given duty
    Negligent misrepresentation- a false representation of a material fact not know to be false but intending to induce reliance
    -Plaintiff reasonably relied on misrepresentations
    Gross negligence- reckless disregard for the truth

    At what point would something go from negligent misrepresentation to gross negligence?

    FAR 74

    #1642820
    pcunniff
    Participant

    Gross negligence is pretty much on the lines of fraud (not physically counting inventory). Negligence is more like “something was known or should have been known” and you didn't do anything about it. I think the key is understanding if it is more along the lines of fraud or not.

    #1642826
    pcunniff
    Participant

    @Matt Why wouldnt the answer be D? I dont get that its just the capital account minus the loss. The 40000 cash just goes away? This doesnt make sense. Why wouldnt that get distributed?

    #1642841
    pcunniff
    Participant

    Also – can someone answer the question i mentioned above about why the other expenses aren't included for an adoption of a child?

    #1642898
    Determined
    Participant

    @ pcunniff the way I think about it is that the deduction for medical expenses goes in schedule A which is for itemized deductions.
    While the other expenses are part of the adoption credit “reasonable expenses,cost and fees are used for the adoption credit (maximum adoption tax credit per child is $13,460) and medical expenses do not qualify as eligible expenses for this credit”.

    #1642934
    pharaoh
    Participant

    I had to go look it up too. As @Determined said, you get credit for the adoption fees and then the child will be part of the family and medical expenses will be deducted as part of the family medical expenses in the itemized deductions

    FAR 8/2016
    AUD 1/2017
    REG TBD
    BEC TBD

    #1643104
    pcunniff
    Participant

    Awesome – thanks guys!

    Is anyone using CPA Wiley Excel? There is a DRS Sim that states what is Allison's tax liability possible penalty using the tax tables? For taxable income being 134,375, how is the tax liability 27,942 for head of household? I'm calculating using the 2016 tables and always get 28,018..

    I wonder if its using 2017 tables or im just being an idiot. Can someone help me? This is a question in the simulations under Individual tax. If someone could help, that would be great.

    #1643168
    CoachEmUp
    Participant

    @pcunniff I can go take a look at it, but just by reading your problem it wouldn't surprise me if it was a Wiley thing. What TBS Assessment was it or is it just a test bank TBS?

    In general Wiley has been good (2 for 2 in passing so far), but the frustrating thing would be all they need to do is have ONE of their employees go through the courses and it would be easy to pick out the bugs/bad questions in their software. I remember one specifically from AUD that was “Which of the following is INCORRECT” and after choosing one the answer was “This is the ONLY answer that is CORRECT.”

    #1643390

    BEC Test Your Might! Please answer in the thread to be eligible to win.

    HiYa!

    #1643417
    Matt
    Participant

    @pcunniff
    Thanks for the response above.

    For your question,keep in mind there are two partners not one.
    The cash not going to the first partner is going to the second, you can calculate it the same way, just with a 40% allocation of the loss.

    FAR 74

    #1643420
    pcunniff
    Participant

    @coachemup .. cool

    Yeah I couldn't agree more. There is nothing worse than going back and trying to figure out why your answer is wrong and wasting time like that.

    #1643422
    Matt
    Participant

    Can anyone explain this one?

    Soma Corp. had $600,000 in compensation expense for book purposes in Year 1. Included in this amount was a $50,000 accrual for Year 1 nonshareholder bonuses. Soma paid the actual Year 1 bonus of $60,000 on March 1, Year 2. In its Year 1 tax return, what amount should Soma deduct as compensation expense?

    A. $540,000
    B. $550,000
    C. $610,000
    D. $600,000

    C is correct.
    A deduction is allowed for all ordinary and necessary business expenses paid or incurred during the taxable year, including a reasonable allowance for salaries or other compensation for personal services actually rendered. Because the bonuses were compensation to unrelated parties, Soma accrues and deducts $50,000 of them in Year 1 and an additional $10,000 in Year 1 because the payment in Year 2 was attributable to the Year 1 tax year of an accrual-method taxpayer.

    FAR 74

    #1643423
    pcunniff
    Participant

    It was (tbs.REGDocrev003)

    Allison's tax liability and possible penalty assuming taxable income is $134,375 and head of household filing status

    Taxable Income $134,375
    Tax Liability (HOH) $ 27,942
    Less: Federal Tax Withheld (21,000)*
    Less: Estimated Tax Paid (1,000)
    Balance Due $ 5,942
    Penalty $ 89**

    *From Robin's Egg W-2 and IDOR 1099-MISC.

    ** Penalty is based on balance due × .5% × 3 months.

    Tax liability is due on April 15.

    #1643435
    CoachEmUp
    Participant

    @Matt that one got me too. My guess (and I don't think it'll be this unclear on exam day) is that since the taxes haven't been filed yet and the actual expense paid within 2.5 months upon the accrual is $10k higher we are allowed to add in that amount as an expense.

    The only thing I can relate it to would be some of the “top-side” or “management” adjustments we would make in Financial accounting when it comes to year end. Especially since the tax system is mostly based on cash basis, we want to adjust to as close to that as we can.

Viewing 15 replies - 166 through 180 (of 596 total)
  • The topic ‘REG Study Group October November 2017 - Page 12’ is closed to new replies.