- This topic has 3,212 replies, 134 voices, and was last updated 12 years, 1 month ago by
so1913.
-
CreatorTopic
-
September 9, 2013 at 2:07 pm #180294
jeffKeymasterREG Resources:
Free REG Notes & Audio – https://www.another71.com/cpa-exam-study-plan
REG 10 Point Combo: https://www.another71.com/products-page/ten-point-combo
REG Score Release: https://www.another71.com/cpa-exam-scores-results-release
-
AuthorReplies
-
October 1, 2013 at 7:17 pm #480238
QladMemberOctober 1, 2013 at 7:17 pm #480264
QladMemberOctober 1, 2013 at 7:39 pm #480240
QladMemberI have a question about agency Law….
The law is that the principle must be an adult but an Agent can be under 18 and a minor….if the principle was not disclosed to the third party, and there is a breach ….will the agent be liable to 3rd party if he/she was minor?
FAR 72,71,81 π
AUD 64,71, 72, 75 π I'm done !!!
REG 73, 74, 74, 84 π
BEC 76 πOctober 1, 2013 at 7:39 pm #480266
QladMemberI have a question about agency Law….
The law is that the principle must be an adult but an Agent can be under 18 and a minor….if the principle was not disclosed to the third party, and there is a breach ….will the agent be liable to 3rd party if he/she was minor?
FAR 72,71,81 π
AUD 64,71, 72, 75 π I'm done !!!
REG 73, 74, 74, 84 π
BEC 76 πOctober 1, 2013 at 8:13 pm #480242
KenadaMemberHmmm I have to look that up Qlad… I thought if Principle is not disclosed it can be either can be sued.
FAR 05/27/14; 786/110 - Done !
October 1, 2013 at 8:13 pm #480268
KenadaMemberHmmm I have to look that up Qlad… I thought if Principle is not disclosed it can be either can be sued.
FAR 05/27/14; 786/110 - Done !
October 1, 2013 at 8:17 pm #480244
stokey45ParticipantI am using the Becker Review Material
The reason that he is not a HDC under the Shelter Doctrine is because his sister was not a HDC. Under the Shelter Doctrine you do not need to give value to be a HDC. I assumed because he received the commercial paper from his sister that she would be an HDC but I guess I can not assume that.
October 1, 2013 at 8:17 pm #480270
stokey45ParticipantI am using the Becker Review Material
The reason that he is not a HDC under the Shelter Doctrine is because his sister was not a HDC. Under the Shelter Doctrine you do not need to give value to be a HDC. I assumed because he received the commercial paper from his sister that she would be an HDC but I guess I can not assume that.
October 1, 2013 at 8:58 pm #480246
stokey45ParticipantI test on Thursday for REG. I took the Final Exam in Becker Review Material this morning and scored a 78. I went back and now understand what I did wrong and hopefully learned from my mistakes. I have been taking 20 question progress tests on chapters to continue to review all afternoon. My eyes are going “buggy” looking at this material and I am exhausted. I am going to finish up one more 20 question progress test and I think call it a day. I am not sure how much more information my brain can absorb today. All in all, I think it was a productive day.
Tomorrow another final exam and more reviewing before the BIG DAY!
October 1, 2013 at 8:58 pm #480272
stokey45ParticipantI test on Thursday for REG. I took the Final Exam in Becker Review Material this morning and scored a 78. I went back and now understand what I did wrong and hopefully learned from my mistakes. I have been taking 20 question progress tests on chapters to continue to review all afternoon. My eyes are going “buggy” looking at this material and I am exhausted. I am going to finish up one more 20 question progress test and I think call it a day. I am not sure how much more information my brain can absorb today. All in all, I think it was a productive day.
Tomorrow another final exam and more reviewing before the BIG DAY!
October 1, 2013 at 9:12 pm #480248
KenadaMemberAwesome π
I have my exam on Oct 17th.. Still reviewing the Chapters one by one and doing question from Wiley book. I still have Agency, Property trans, Estates, Depn and Bankrupcy to go through.
I hope to be done by Sunday with them all.
That gives me about 10 days where I can do the progress tests and Exam sessions in the Wiley Test bank plus the Gleim test bank π
All I can say going through them for a second time is helping me make more sense of the material.
FAR 05/27/14; 786/110 - Done !
October 1, 2013 at 9:12 pm #480274
KenadaMemberAwesome π
I have my exam on Oct 17th.. Still reviewing the Chapters one by one and doing question from Wiley book. I still have Agency, Property trans, Estates, Depn and Bankrupcy to go through.
I hope to be done by Sunday with them all.
That gives me about 10 days where I can do the progress tests and Exam sessions in the Wiley Test bank plus the Gleim test bank π
All I can say going through them for a second time is helping me make more sense of the material.
FAR 05/27/14; 786/110 - Done !
October 2, 2013 at 2:49 am #480250
QladMemberI have a question about worthless stock….
Q: Kelly had inherited 500shares of M corp from her father. Father had purchased the stock for $5000. The company is now bankrupt and out of business. At her father's death on 4/1/1 the FMV of shares was $8000. Court documents have revealed that Kelly will receive nothing for her 500 shares. What is the amount of Recognized gain/loss in year 9.
A. is (8000)…but i thought that u must be the original owner to deduct sec.1244 losses for worthless shares…????
FAR 72,71,81 π
AUD 64,71, 72, 75 π I'm done !!!
REG 73, 74, 74, 84 π
BEC 76 πOctober 2, 2013 at 2:49 am #480276
QladMemberI have a question about worthless stock….
Q: Kelly had inherited 500shares of M corp from her father. Father had purchased the stock for $5000. The company is now bankrupt and out of business. At her father's death on 4/1/1 the FMV of shares was $8000. Court documents have revealed that Kelly will receive nothing for her 500 shares. What is the amount of Recognized gain/loss in year 9.
A. is (8000)…but i thought that u must be the original owner to deduct sec.1244 losses for worthless shares…????
FAR 72,71,81 π
AUD 64,71, 72, 75 π I'm done !!!
REG 73, 74, 74, 84 π
BEC 76 πOctober 2, 2013 at 6:21 am #480252
KenadaMemberDid the answer say A was Ordinary Loss or Capital Loss ?
I am wondering when did the stock become worthless. Was it before the father died or after? I think if it was before then the loss should be part of this estate.
For Sec 1244
1. Must be original holder of the stock
2. Stock can be common or preferred
3. Ordinary loss limit is 50,000.00 – Single or 100,000 Married
Notes from IRS—-
Worthless Securities
Stocks, stock rights, and bonds (other than those held for sale by a securities dealer) that became completely worthless during the tax year are treated as though they were sold on the last day of the tax year. This affects whether your capital loss is long term or short term. See Holding Period , later.
From IRS….
Worthless securities also include securities that you abandon after March 12, 2008. To abandon a security, you must permanently surrender and relinquish all rights in the security and receive no consideration in exchange for it. All the facts and circumstances determine whether the transaction is properly characterized as an abandonment or other type of transaction, such as an actual sale or exchange, contribution to capital, dividend, or gift.
If you are a cash basis taxpayer and make payments on a negotiable promissory note that you issued for stock that became worthless, you can deduct these payments as losses in the years you actually make the payments. Do not deduct them in the year the stock became worthless.
FAR 05/27/14; 786/110 - Done !
-
AuthorReplies
- The topic ‘REG Study Group October November 2013 - Page 69’ is closed to new replies.
