REG Study Group October November 2013 - Page 42

Viewing 15 replies - 616 through 630 (of 3,212 total)
  • Author
    Replies
  • #479855
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Guys, can someone PLEASE help me understand this question:

    The partnership of Bond & Felton has a fiscal year ending September 30. John Bond files his tax return on a calendar-year basis. The partnership paid Bond a guaranteed salary of $1,000 per month during the calendar year 2011 and $1,500 a month during the calendar year 2012. After deducting this salary the partnership realized ordinary income of $80,000 for the year ended September 30, 2012 and $90,000 for the year ended September 30, 2013. Bond's share of the profits is the salary paid him plus 40% of the ordinary income after deducting this salary. For 2012, Bond should report taxable income from the partnership of

    a) $50,000

    b) $44,000

    c) $36,500

    d) $48,500

    #479834
    Kenada
    Member

    It is my understanding that generally, the person who receives your gift will not have to pay any federal gift tax because of it.

    FAR 05/27/14; 786/110 - Done !

    #479857
    Kenada
    Member

    It is my understanding that generally, the person who receives your gift will not have to pay any federal gift tax because of it.

    FAR 05/27/14; 786/110 - Done !

    #479836
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    My approach was that for 2012 Bond would report on his tax return income earned in the CALENDAR YEAR of 2012. Therefore he would report taxable income from guaranteed payments of ($1,500 x 12 months) $18,000 and income from partnership interest from 2012 fiscal year (January – September 2012 or 9 months = 80,000/12 months x 9 months = $60,000) and income from partnership interest from the 2013 fiscal year (October – December 2012 or 3 months = $90,000/12 months x 3 months = $22,500)

    For a total of $18,000 + $60,000 + $22,500 = $100,500

    That isn't even an option for the answer, can someone tell me where my analysis of this problem is wrong so i don't make the same mistake during the exam?

    #479859
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    My approach was that for 2012 Bond would report on his tax return income earned in the CALENDAR YEAR of 2012. Therefore he would report taxable income from guaranteed payments of ($1,500 x 12 months) $18,000 and income from partnership interest from 2012 fiscal year (January – September 2012 or 9 months = 80,000/12 months x 9 months = $60,000) and income from partnership interest from the 2013 fiscal year (October – December 2012 or 3 months = $90,000/12 months x 3 months = $22,500)

    For a total of $18,000 + $60,000 + $22,500 = $100,500

    That isn't even an option for the answer, can someone tell me where my analysis of this problem is wrong so i don't make the same mistake during the exam?

    #479838
    kevlee
    Member

    @cpaforeigner

    it says the fiscal year ends in september so you do…

    1000 x 3 = 3000

    1500 x 9 = 13500

    80,000 x 40% = 32000

    is the answer D?

    #479861
    kevlee
    Member

    @cpaforeigner

    it says the fiscal year ends in september so you do…

    1000 x 3 = 3000

    1500 x 9 = 13500

    80,000 x 40% = 32000

    is the answer D?

    #479840
    Kenada
    Member

    I would have picked D too. Same cal as above for the Salary.

    I remember reading the Partnership income would be included in the tax return depending on the date it was distributed. So 80,000 @ 40% was distributed end of 2012, so would be part of 2012 Tax return. The 90,000 @ 40% will be included in his 2013 Tax Return.

    At least that would be the logic I used to come up to answer D

    FAR 05/27/14; 786/110 - Done !

    #479863
    Kenada
    Member

    I would have picked D too. Same cal as above for the Salary.

    I remember reading the Partnership income would be included in the tax return depending on the date it was distributed. So 80,000 @ 40% was distributed end of 2012, so would be part of 2012 Tax return. The 90,000 @ 40% will be included in his 2013 Tax Return.

    At least that would be the logic I used to come up to answer D

    FAR 05/27/14; 786/110 - Done !

    #479842
    smsingla
    Member

    @CPAforeigner… I would say answer is a.

    $15000×12=18000

    $80,000×40% = 32000

    total of 50,000

    REG 81
    BEC 74,65,78
    FAR 79
    AUD 85 DONE!!!

    #479865
    smsingla
    Member

    @CPAforeigner… I would say answer is a.

    $15000×12=18000

    $80,000×40% = 32000

    total of 50,000

    REG 81
    BEC 74,65,78
    FAR 79
    AUD 85 DONE!!!

    #479844
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    @kevlee & insinyah24 both of you are correct it is answer D.

    I think my hiccup in understanding is what you insinyah, even though he is calender year taxpayer he still recognizes income based on the partnership's fiscal year. This actually makes more sense of the fact that they try and limit the deferral of income like what is happening in this example.

    #479867
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    @kevlee & insinyah24 both of you are correct it is answer D.

    I think my hiccup in understanding is what you insinyah, even though he is calender year taxpayer he still recognizes income based on the partnership's fiscal year. This actually makes more sense of the fact that they try and limit the deferral of income like what is happening in this example.

    #479845
    Qlad
    Member

    just wondering where can I get more practice on AMT questions…Becker has very few and feel it is not enough for practice…or is tested very lightly? any ideas?

    FAR 72,71,81 πŸ™‚
    AUD 64,71, 72, 75 πŸ™‚ I'm done !!!
    REG 73, 74, 74, 84 πŸ™‚
    BEC 76 πŸ™‚

    #479869
    Qlad
    Member

    just wondering where can I get more practice on AMT questions…Becker has very few and feel it is not enough for practice…or is tested very lightly? any ideas?

    FAR 72,71,81 πŸ™‚
    AUD 64,71, 72, 75 πŸ™‚ I'm done !!!
    REG 73, 74, 74, 84 πŸ™‚
    BEC 76 πŸ™‚

Viewing 15 replies - 616 through 630 (of 3,212 total)
  • The topic ‘REG Study Group October November 2013 - Page 42’ is closed to new replies.