REG Study Group October November 2013 - Page 184

Viewing 15 replies - 2,746 through 2,760 (of 3,212 total)
  • Author
    Replies
  • #481988
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Thank you guys! So unrecaptured 1250 that goes on the K1 is just the regular straight line? And the amount that is recaptured as ordinary income is the excess of MACRS over straight line?

    #481983
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    @marie22, yes if it is an accrual basis taxpayer, you add the increase in A/R to revenue

    #481990
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    @marie22, yes if it is an accrual basis taxpayer, you add the increase in A/R to revenue

    #481985
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    @Igotthis, so the unrecaptured 1250 depreciation is treated as 1231 gains? I am confused now!!!

    #481992
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    @Igotthis, so the unrecaptured 1250 depreciation is treated as 1231 gains? I am confused now!!!

    #481987
    Igotthis
    Participant

    @amelia. Yup. Having examples will help. This is how I remember things:

    Prior to 1987, real estate was using ACRS.

    EX. In 1980, ACRS depreciation is 200,000 and under MACRS straight line is 150,000. So the excess depreciation is 50,000. If the property was sold with a gain of 75,000. The 50,000 would be 1250 Recapture (Ordinary income) and the 25,000 would be nonrecaptured 1250 (Long term capital gain – with a maximum of 25% tax bracket).

    Does this help?

    #481994
    Igotthis
    Participant

    @amelia. Yup. Having examples will help. This is how I remember things:

    Prior to 1987, real estate was using ACRS.

    EX. In 1980, ACRS depreciation is 200,000 and under MACRS straight line is 150,000. So the excess depreciation is 50,000. If the property was sold with a gain of 75,000. The 50,000 would be 1250 Recapture (Ordinary income) and the 25,000 would be nonrecaptured 1250 (Long term capital gain – with a maximum of 25% tax bracket).

    Does this help?

    #481989
    jaredo155
    Member

    I am sure someone has already answered this, but I was just curious because there is a discrepency between the Ninja notes and the IRS website for the 2012 Section 179 deduction and total equipment purchases amount (the amounts tested in 2013). According to the Ninja notes it is a $139,000 deduction and $560,000 purchases, and on the IRS it is $500,000 deduction and $2,000,000 purchases. I have to assume the IRS is correct, but is that what we are tested on?

    AUD - 2/2013 - Passed!
    BEC - 5/2013 - Passed!
    FAR - 8/2013 - Passed!
    REG - 11/2013 - Passed!
    "Do or do not, there is no try." - Yoda

    #481995
    jaredo155
    Member

    I am sure someone has already answered this, but I was just curious because there is a discrepency between the Ninja notes and the IRS website for the 2012 Section 179 deduction and total equipment purchases amount (the amounts tested in 2013). According to the Ninja notes it is a $139,000 deduction and $560,000 purchases, and on the IRS it is $500,000 deduction and $2,000,000 purchases. I have to assume the IRS is correct, but is that what we are tested on?

    AUD - 2/2013 - Passed!
    BEC - 5/2013 - Passed!
    FAR - 8/2013 - Passed!
    REG - 11/2013 - Passed!
    "Do or do not, there is no try." - Yoda

    #481991
    jaredo155
    Member

    Disregard my above post I just found the conversation covering Section 179 on the prior page, sorry for not being more diligent before posting.

    AUD - 2/2013 - Passed!
    BEC - 5/2013 - Passed!
    FAR - 8/2013 - Passed!
    REG - 11/2013 - Passed!
    "Do or do not, there is no try." - Yoda

    #481996
    jaredo155
    Member

    Disregard my above post I just found the conversation covering Section 179 on the prior page, sorry for not being more diligent before posting.

    AUD - 2/2013 - Passed!
    BEC - 5/2013 - Passed!
    FAR - 8/2013 - Passed!
    REG - 11/2013 - Passed!
    "Do or do not, there is no try." - Yoda

    #481993
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Guys Becker updated their software to include 2013 phase out numbers and rates. I am so confused because I am taking the exam end of November and am not sure if I should study 2012 or 2013 numbers?

    #481998
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Guys Becker updated their software to include 2013 phase out numbers and rates. I am so confused because I am taking the exam end of November and am not sure if I should study 2012 or 2013 numbers?

    #481997
    jaredo155
    Member

    The exam taken in November 2013 will be tested on 2012 numbers, not the 2013 numbers which will be tested starting in the first window of 2014.

    AUD - 2/2013 - Passed!
    BEC - 5/2013 - Passed!
    FAR - 8/2013 - Passed!
    REG - 11/2013 - Passed!
    "Do or do not, there is no try." - Yoda

    #482000
    jaredo155
    Member

    The exam taken in November 2013 will be tested on 2012 numbers, not the 2013 numbers which will be tested starting in the first window of 2014.

    AUD - 2/2013 - Passed!
    BEC - 5/2013 - Passed!
    FAR - 8/2013 - Passed!
    REG - 11/2013 - Passed!
    "Do or do not, there is no try." - Yoda

Viewing 15 replies - 2,746 through 2,760 (of 3,212 total)
  • The topic ‘REG Study Group October November 2013 - Page 184’ is closed to new replies.