REG Study Group October November 2013 - Page 164

Viewing 15 replies - 2,446 through 2,460 (of 3,212 total)
  • Author
    Replies
  • #481690
    Sam
    Participant

    After doing some practice sims today I'm a little confused on depreciation. In the sims they gave the class of property and the depreciation tables to use to calc the depreciation for the various years. In most of the material that I read and the practice questions it's been more a case of determining mid-year, quarter or month. When should the tables be used instead of mid-year, mid-quarter, mid month?

    Also, how's depreciation computed in the year of disposal? I'd think it would be similar to year of acquisition where you determine mid-year, quarter or month…

    #481670
    ssiegri
    Participant

    FYI: Make sure you guys know the ins and outs of the trickier MC questions for the simulations or pray for a lucky roll of the dice.. I rocked the MC per my fail report (scored higher in every category) and obviously bombed the simulations.. Ended up as a 73..

    #481691
    ssiegri
    Participant

    FYI: Make sure you guys know the ins and outs of the trickier MC questions for the simulations or pray for a lucky roll of the dice.. I rocked the MC per my fail report (scored higher in every category) and obviously bombed the simulations.. Ended up as a 73..

    #481672
    UCMCPA
    Member

    Sam… seems you're a bit confused.

    The tables are in mid-month, HY, MQ etc. The percentages you would use are already accounting for that, you just have to make sure you have the correct table.

    Additionally, you are correct about year of disposal. If it's HY you get 1/2 year depr in year of acquisition and year of disposal.

    FAR - 84
    AUD - 94
    REG - 86
    BEC - 86

    #481692
    UCMCPA
    Member

    Sam… seems you're a bit confused.

    The tables are in mid-month, HY, MQ etc. The percentages you would use are already accounting for that, you just have to make sure you have the correct table.

    Additionally, you are correct about year of disposal. If it's HY you get 1/2 year depr in year of acquisition and year of disposal.

    FAR - 84
    AUD - 94
    REG - 86
    BEC - 86

    #481674
    terranz
    Member

    @UCMCPA:

    how did you memorize if something should be an increase, decrease to E&P, or no effect on E&P?

    it's like m-1 and AMT with all of the rules of what will increase or decrease E&P.

    #481694
    terranz
    Member

    @UCMCPA:

    how did you memorize if something should be an increase, decrease to E&P, or no effect on E&P?

    it's like m-1 and AMT with all of the rules of what will increase or decrease E&P.

    #481676
    Sam
    Participant

    Thanks. That makes sense…and sounds like I should get to the same answer either way.

    #481696
    Sam
    Participant

    Thanks. That makes sense…and sounds like I should get to the same answer either way.

    #481679
    UCMCPA
    Member

    @ Terranz… I looked at it like this, if it has the ability to increase or decrease the companies ability to pay a dividend, then it influenced E&P.

    Say if something was NOT tax deductible that they paid out in cash, but it lowered their ability to pay a dividend, then it will likely influence E&P and decrease E&P.

    FAR - 84
    AUD - 94
    REG - 86
    BEC - 86

    #481698
    UCMCPA
    Member

    @ Terranz… I looked at it like this, if it has the ability to increase or decrease the companies ability to pay a dividend, then it influenced E&P.

    Say if something was NOT tax deductible that they paid out in cash, but it lowered their ability to pay a dividend, then it will likely influence E&P and decrease E&P.

    FAR - 84
    AUD - 94
    REG - 86
    BEC - 86

    #481681
    UCMCPA
    Member

    @ Terranz… I looked at it like this, if it has the ability to increase or decrease the companies ability to pay a dividend, then it influenced E&P.

    Say if something was NOT tax deductible that they paid out in cash, but it lowered their ability to pay a dividend, then it will likely influence E&P and decrease E&P.

    FAR - 84
    AUD - 94
    REG - 86
    BEC - 86

    #481700
    UCMCPA
    Member

    @ Terranz… I looked at it like this, if it has the ability to increase or decrease the companies ability to pay a dividend, then it influenced E&P.

    Say if something was NOT tax deductible that they paid out in cash, but it lowered their ability to pay a dividend, then it will likely influence E&P and decrease E&P.

    FAR - 84
    AUD - 94
    REG - 86
    BEC - 86

    #481683
    terranz
    Member

    @UCMCPA

    i'm not sure I follow :[

    1. unrealized losses at year end on securities own = no (effect I get this)

    2. increase in cash surrender value of life insurance policies owned by the company = E&P increase

    3. gain on prior year installment sale recognized in the Current year = E&P decrease

    don't understand 2-3.

    to me a gain in the current year should increase E&P, and increase the amount the company can pay out as a div?

    #481702
    terranz
    Member

    @UCMCPA

    i'm not sure I follow :[

    1. unrealized losses at year end on securities own = no (effect I get this)

    2. increase in cash surrender value of life insurance policies owned by the company = E&P increase

    3. gain on prior year installment sale recognized in the Current year = E&P decrease

    don't understand 2-3.

    to me a gain in the current year should increase E&P, and increase the amount the company can pay out as a div?

Viewing 15 replies - 2,446 through 2,460 (of 3,212 total)
  • The topic ‘REG Study Group October November 2013 - Page 164’ is closed to new replies.