REG Study Group October November 2013 - Page 161

Viewing 15 replies - 2,401 through 2,415 (of 3,212 total)
  • Author
    Replies
  • #481621
    Kenada
    Member

    🙂 I know I agree about reading the question part. The SIM's are making me nervous and I am doing them now.. I am making stupid mistake's in P/ship and Individual taxes and those are the topics i am stronger in… I am very bad in corp tax and B'law esp Sales/contracts secured creditors… Its driving me banana's.

    You are right- we have worked hard to prepare for this exam. There is nothing more I can do if I had 1 or 3 more days. I will never grasp those B-law subjects as they are like a alien language to me LOL.

    FAR 05/27/14; 786/110 - Done !

    #481642
    Kenada
    Member

    🙂 I know I agree about reading the question part. The SIM's are making me nervous and I am doing them now.. I am making stupid mistake's in P/ship and Individual taxes and those are the topics i am stronger in… I am very bad in corp tax and B'law esp Sales/contracts secured creditors… Its driving me banana's.

    You are right- we have worked hard to prepare for this exam. There is nothing more I can do if I had 1 or 3 more days. I will never grasp those B-law subjects as they are like a alien language to me LOL.

    FAR 05/27/14; 786/110 - Done !

    #481623
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    I am confused about related parties…sometimes I feel like it says >80% owner and other times it is >50%…Which is it!? For example, with related party losses, my notes say >50% owner, losses are disallowed. Then, in another section I see that a loss with a >80% subsidiary is an ordinary loss. I don't understand.

    #481644
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    I am confused about related parties…sometimes I feel like it says >80% owner and other times it is >50%…Which is it!? For example, with related party losses, my notes say >50% owner, losses are disallowed. Then, in another section I see that a loss with a >80% subsidiary is an ordinary loss. I don't understand.

    #481625
    Skrier
    Member

    @Cupcake and IY…Good Luck tomorrow…you will both do fine!!! Let us know how it goes and we can all wait for Nov 1 score release and celebrate!!!

    AUD- 84
    FAR- 75
    REG- 78...I am DONE!!!
    BEC- 79

    #481646
    Skrier
    Member

    @Cupcake and IY…Good Luck tomorrow…you will both do fine!!! Let us know how it goes and we can all wait for Nov 1 score release and celebrate!!!

    AUD- 84
    FAR- 75
    REG- 78...I am DONE!!!
    BEC- 79

    #481627
    Sam
    Participant

    The Rites are married, file a joint income tax return, and qualify to itemize their deductions in the current year. Their adjusted gross income for the year was $55,000, and during the year they paid the following taxes:

    Real estate tax on personal residence $2,000

    Ad valorem tax on personal automobile $500

    Current year state and city income taxes withheld from paycheck $1,000

    What total amount of the expense should the Rites claim as an itemized deduction on their current year joint income tax return?

    $1,000

    $3,000

    $3,500

    $2,500

    Wiley says the correct answer is $3,500 as all of them can be deducted. I thought the correct answer would be $2,600 since they could only take itemized deductions that exceed 2% of their AGI ($1,100). Can anyone explain why the 2% of AGI thresshold is not a factor?

    #481648
    Sam
    Participant

    The Rites are married, file a joint income tax return, and qualify to itemize their deductions in the current year. Their adjusted gross income for the year was $55,000, and during the year they paid the following taxes:

    Real estate tax on personal residence $2,000

    Ad valorem tax on personal automobile $500

    Current year state and city income taxes withheld from paycheck $1,000

    What total amount of the expense should the Rites claim as an itemized deduction on their current year joint income tax return?

    $1,000

    $3,000

    $3,500

    $2,500

    Wiley says the correct answer is $3,500 as all of them can be deducted. I thought the correct answer would be $2,600 since they could only take itemized deductions that exceed 2% of their AGI ($1,100). Can anyone explain why the 2% of AGI thresshold is not a factor?

    #481629
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    @sam Tax deductions are not subject to the 2% threshold. Same for charitable contribtions, medical, investment interest expense, gambling losses, and casualty losses.

    #481650
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    @sam Tax deductions are not subject to the 2% threshold. Same for charitable contribtions, medical, investment interest expense, gambling losses, and casualty losses.

    #481631
    Future_FLCPA
    Member

    To add onto @Cupcake's statement, misc itemized deductions ARE subject to the 2% AGI floor limitation

    B - 80 (Aug 2012)
    A - 89 (Jan 2013)
    F - 77 (May 2013)
    R - 83 (Nov 2013)

    #481652
    Future_FLCPA
    Member

    To add onto @Cupcake's statement, misc itemized deductions ARE subject to the 2% AGI floor limitation

    B - 80 (Aug 2012)
    A - 89 (Jan 2013)
    F - 77 (May 2013)
    R - 83 (Nov 2013)

    #481633
    Sam
    Participant

    Got it – thank you both!

    #481654
    Sam
    Participant

    Got it – thank you both!

    #481635
    Future_FLCPA
    Member

    Good luck to @IY & @Cupcake on your exam today!

    B - 80 (Aug 2012)
    A - 89 (Jan 2013)
    F - 77 (May 2013)
    R - 83 (Nov 2013)

Viewing 15 replies - 2,401 through 2,415 (of 3,212 total)
  • The topic ‘REG Study Group October November 2013 - Page 161’ is closed to new replies.