REG Study Group October November 2013 - Page 149

Viewing 15 replies - 2,221 through 2,235 (of 3,212 total)
  • Author
    Replies
  • #481440
    Future_FLCPA
    Member

    What about reliance?

    B - 80 (Aug 2012)
    A - 89 (Jan 2013)
    F - 77 (May 2013)
    R - 83 (Nov 2013)

    #481463
    Future_FLCPA
    Member

    What about reliance?

    B - 80 (Aug 2012)
    A - 89 (Jan 2013)
    F - 77 (May 2013)
    R - 83 (Nov 2013)

    #481442
    Kenada
    Member

    In the current year, Tatum exchanged farmland for an office building. The farmland had a basis of $250,000, a fair market value (FMV) of $400,000, and was encumbered by a $120,000 mortgage. The office building had an FMV of $350,000 and was encumbered by a $70,000 mortgage. Each party assumed the other’s mortgage. What is the amount of Tatum’s recognized gain?

    A $150,000

    B $0

    C $ 50,000

    D $100,000

    FAR 05/27/14; 786/110 - Done !

    #481465
    Kenada
    Member

    In the current year, Tatum exchanged farmland for an office building. The farmland had a basis of $250,000, a fair market value (FMV) of $400,000, and was encumbered by a $120,000 mortgage. The office building had an FMV of $350,000 and was encumbered by a $70,000 mortgage. Each party assumed the other’s mortgage. What is the amount of Tatum’s recognized gain?

    A $150,000

    B $0

    C $ 50,000

    D $100,000

    FAR 05/27/14; 786/110 - Done !

    #481444
    Skrier
    Member

    Under 1933, one only needs to show they bought the stock, they suffered a loss and there was a material misstatement, nothing else. Under 1934 They must show Scienter and Reliance

    AUD- 84
    FAR- 75
    REG- 78...I am DONE!!!
    BEC- 79

    #481467
    Skrier
    Member

    Under 1933, one only needs to show they bought the stock, they suffered a loss and there was a material misstatement, nothing else. Under 1934 They must show Scienter and Reliance

    AUD- 84
    FAR- 75
    REG- 78...I am DONE!!!
    BEC- 79

    #481446
    Future_FLCPA
    Member

    B - 80 (Aug 2012)
    A - 89 (Jan 2013)
    F - 77 (May 2013)
    R - 83 (Nov 2013)

    #481469
    Future_FLCPA
    Member

    B - 80 (Aug 2012)
    A - 89 (Jan 2013)
    F - 77 (May 2013)
    R - 83 (Nov 2013)

    #481448
    Future_FLCPA
    Member

    C? Tatum's original liability less new liability assumed

    Seems like a like kind exchange (realty for realty). In such an event, you'll need to take the boot into consideration (liabilities released or assumed)

    .

    B - 80 (Aug 2012)
    A - 89 (Jan 2013)
    F - 77 (May 2013)
    R - 83 (Nov 2013)

    #481471
    Future_FLCPA
    Member

    C? Tatum's original liability less new liability assumed

    Seems like a like kind exchange (realty for realty). In such an event, you'll need to take the boot into consideration (liabilities released or assumed)

    .

    B - 80 (Aug 2012)
    A - 89 (Jan 2013)
    F - 77 (May 2013)
    R - 83 (Nov 2013)

    #481450
    Skrier
    Member

    @Furture you can also look at it this was…the earlier you act (1933 ACT) the easier it is to recover…meaning the less you have to show. The later you act (1934 ACT) the harder it is to recover…meaning the more you have to prove (Reliance and Scienter). Kinda cheesy but it helps me keep it straight.

    AUD- 84
    FAR- 75
    REG- 78...I am DONE!!!
    BEC- 79

    #481473
    Skrier
    Member

    @Furture you can also look at it this was…the earlier you act (1933 ACT) the easier it is to recover…meaning the less you have to show. The later you act (1934 ACT) the harder it is to recover…meaning the more you have to prove (Reliance and Scienter). Kinda cheesy but it helps me keep it straight.

    AUD- 84
    FAR- 75
    REG- 78...I am DONE!!!
    BEC- 79

    #481452
    Future_FLCPA
    Member

    I like that! Thanks @Skrier

    B - 80 (Aug 2012)
    A - 89 (Jan 2013)
    F - 77 (May 2013)
    R - 83 (Nov 2013)

    #481475
    Future_FLCPA
    Member

    I like that! Thanks @Skrier

    B - 80 (Aug 2012)
    A - 89 (Jan 2013)
    F - 77 (May 2013)
    R - 83 (Nov 2013)

    #481454
    Skrier
    Member

    @IY…I also think it is C, $50,000, Under the like kind exchange the gain recognized is the lesser of gain realized or boot received. In this case realized gain would be $150,000 and net boot received would be $50,000. So the lesser of should be the correct answer.

    AUD- 84
    FAR- 75
    REG- 78...I am DONE!!!
    BEC- 79

Viewing 15 replies - 2,221 through 2,235 (of 3,212 total)
  • The topic ‘REG Study Group October November 2013 - Page 149’ is closed to new replies.