REG Study Group October November 2013 - Page 148

Viewing 15 replies - 2,206 through 2,220 (of 3,212 total)
  • Author
    Replies
  • #481447
    Kenada
    Member

    No one else can comment on the feed back for the posted dated check question ?

    FAR 05/27/14; 786/110 - Done !

    #481426
    Skrier
    Member

    @IY after looking at the link you provided, I would say this is a time draft and not a post dated check. There would not be a date in the lower body of the check if it were a post dated check. Does this make sense?

    AUD- 84
    FAR- 75
    REG- 78...I am DONE!!!
    BEC- 79

    #481449
    Skrier
    Member

    @IY after looking at the link you provided, I would say this is a time draft and not a post dated check. There would not be a date in the lower body of the check if it were a post dated check. Does this make sense?

    AUD- 84
    FAR- 75
    REG- 78...I am DONE!!!
    BEC- 79

    #481428
    smsingla
    Member

    But Why not D? The thing is that this question is there in both Wiley book and Wiley Test Bank. In book they have chosen D as instead of B in this question they have Failure to file a required tax return. But in Wiley test Bank, where I picked this question from, answer is B. So I am confused

    REG 81
    BEC 74,65,78
    FAR 79
    AUD 85 DONE!!!

    #481451
    smsingla
    Member

    But Why not D? The thing is that this question is there in both Wiley book and Wiley Test Bank. In book they have chosen D as instead of B in this question they have Failure to file a required tax return. But in Wiley test Bank, where I picked this question from, answer is B. So I am confused

    REG 81
    BEC 74,65,78
    FAR 79
    AUD 85 DONE!!!

    #481430
    Kenada
    Member

    Hiya = Skier, so how would I know it is a postdated check. What would be the tell tell signs ?

    FAR 05/27/14; 786/110 - Done !

    #481453
    Kenada
    Member

    Hiya = Skier, so how would I know it is a postdated check. What would be the tell tell signs ?

    FAR 05/27/14; 786/110 - Done !

    #481432
    Skrier
    Member

    I would say the date of the check would be a date in the future. Meaning the check “issue” date is some point in the future.

    For the example you provided, the issue date is current date, but the date of payment (in the body of the instrument) is in the future, making it a time draft.

    If there is a date listed in the body of the instrument that is a tell tale sign it is not a check.

    AUD- 84
    FAR- 75
    REG- 78...I am DONE!!!
    BEC- 79

    #481455
    Skrier
    Member

    I would say the date of the check would be a date in the future. Meaning the check “issue” date is some point in the future.

    For the example you provided, the issue date is current date, but the date of payment (in the body of the instrument) is in the future, making it a time draft.

    If there is a date listed in the body of the instrument that is a tell tale sign it is not a check.

    AUD- 84
    FAR- 75
    REG- 78...I am DONE!!!
    BEC- 79

    #481434
    Skrier
    Member

    Re-writing B-law notes…oh what fun… Hopefully this will stick in my head for tomorrow!!!

    AUD- 84
    FAR- 75
    REG- 78...I am DONE!!!
    BEC- 79

    #481457
    Skrier
    Member

    Re-writing B-law notes…oh what fun… Hopefully this will stick in my head for tomorrow!!!

    AUD- 84
    FAR- 75
    REG- 78...I am DONE!!!
    BEC- 79

    #481436
    Future_FLCPA
    Member

    I keep getting confused about the requirements for 1933 & 1933 acts. Anyone have any quick differentiations? What criteria is needed for a plaintiff to bring a suit and what are the accountant's defenses?

    B - 80 (Aug 2012)
    A - 89 (Jan 2013)
    F - 77 (May 2013)
    R - 83 (Nov 2013)

    #481459
    Future_FLCPA
    Member

    I keep getting confused about the requirements for 1933 & 1933 acts. Anyone have any quick differentiations? What criteria is needed for a plaintiff to bring a suit and what are the accountant's defenses?

    B - 80 (Aug 2012)
    A - 89 (Jan 2013)
    F - 77 (May 2013)
    R - 83 (Nov 2013)

    #481438
    UCMCPA
    Member

    In the 1933 they only have to LAM (loss occurred, acquire the stock, material misstatement existed). with the 1934 you add in LAM + some elements of fraud (scienter for instance)

    FAR - 84
    AUD - 94
    REG - 86
    BEC - 86

    #481461
    UCMCPA
    Member

    In the 1933 they only have to LAM (loss occurred, acquire the stock, material misstatement existed). with the 1934 you add in LAM + some elements of fraud (scienter for instance)

    FAR - 84
    AUD - 94
    REG - 86
    BEC - 86

Viewing 15 replies - 2,206 through 2,220 (of 3,212 total)
  • The topic ‘REG Study Group October November 2013 - Page 148’ is closed to new replies.