REG Study Group October November 2013 - Page 143

Viewing 15 replies - 2,131 through 2,145 (of 3,212 total)
  • Author
    Replies
  • #481350
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    @UCMCPA for ref. sake, this q is from Becker 2012 R2 HW – first q in Ind. Tax: Other Taxes

    thanks

    #481373
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    @UCMCPA for ref. sake, this q is from Becker 2012 R2 HW – first q in Ind. Tax: Other Taxes

    thanks

    #481352
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    i'm wondering what a schedule C is (in english for me- no tax background whatsoever)

    #481375
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    i'm wondering what a schedule C is (in english for me- no tax background whatsoever)

    #481354
    UCMCPA
    Member

    A schedule C is where a taxpayer that runs a business accounts for their income or loss. My dad is a jeweler and is self-employed. His tax return has a Schedule C on it. https://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-pdf/f1040sc.pdf

    FAR - 84
    AUD - 94
    REG - 86
    BEC - 86

    #481377
    UCMCPA
    Member

    A schedule C is where a taxpayer that runs a business accounts for their income or loss. My dad is a jeweler and is self-employed. His tax return has a Schedule C on it. https://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-pdf/f1040sc.pdf

    FAR - 84
    AUD - 94
    REG - 86
    BEC - 86

    #481356
    Kenada
    Member

    Turner, Reed, and Sumner are equal partners in TRS partnership. Turner contributed land with an adjusted basis of $20,000 and a fair market value (FMV) of $50,000. Reed contributed equipment with an adjusted basis of $40,000 and an FMV of $50,000. Sumner provided services worth $50,000. What amount of income is recognized as a result of the transfers?

    A. $50,000

    B. $90,000

    C. $60,000

    D. $150,000

    FAR 05/27/14; 786/110 - Done !

    #481379
    Kenada
    Member

    Turner, Reed, and Sumner are equal partners in TRS partnership. Turner contributed land with an adjusted basis of $20,000 and a fair market value (FMV) of $50,000. Reed contributed equipment with an adjusted basis of $40,000 and an FMV of $50,000. Sumner provided services worth $50,000. What amount of income is recognized as a result of the transfers?

    A. $50,000

    B. $90,000

    C. $60,000

    D. $150,000

    FAR 05/27/14; 786/110 - Done !

    #481358
    Kenada
    Member

    ABC is a calendar-year partnership with three partners, Alan, Bob, and Cathy. The profits and losses are shared in proportion to each partner’s contributions. On January 1, the ratio was 90% for Alan, 5% for Bob, and 5% for Cathy. On December 1, Bob and Cathy each contributed additional amounts and the new profit and loss sharing ratios were 30% for Alan, 35% for Bob, and 35% for Cathy. For its tax year ending December 31, the partnership had a loss of $1,200. This loss occurred equally over the partnership’s tax year. How is the loss allocated?

    A. Alan $1,020, Bob $90, Cathy $90.

    B. Alan $360, Bob $420, Cathy $420.

    C. Alan $720, Bob $240, Cathy $240.

    D. Alan $1,080, Bob $60, Cathy $60.

    FAR 05/27/14; 786/110 - Done !

    #481381
    Kenada
    Member

    ABC is a calendar-year partnership with three partners, Alan, Bob, and Cathy. The profits and losses are shared in proportion to each partner’s contributions. On January 1, the ratio was 90% for Alan, 5% for Bob, and 5% for Cathy. On December 1, Bob and Cathy each contributed additional amounts and the new profit and loss sharing ratios were 30% for Alan, 35% for Bob, and 35% for Cathy. For its tax year ending December 31, the partnership had a loss of $1,200. This loss occurred equally over the partnership’s tax year. How is the loss allocated?

    A. Alan $1,020, Bob $90, Cathy $90.

    B. Alan $360, Bob $420, Cathy $420.

    C. Alan $720, Bob $240, Cathy $240.

    D. Alan $1,080, Bob $60, Cathy $60.

    FAR 05/27/14; 786/110 - Done !

    #481360
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    I pick A. Alan $1,020. Bob $90 and Cathy $90. I allocated based on the percentage of year they owned a certain percentage of shares.

    For the one above that, I would choose A. $50,000. The contribution of services would cause a gain, but the others do not.

    #481383
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    I pick A. Alan $1,020. Bob $90 and Cathy $90. I allocated based on the percentage of year they owned a certain percentage of shares.

    For the one above that, I would choose A. $50,000. The contribution of services would cause a gain, but the others do not.

    #481362
    Kenada
    Member

    Yes that is right Cupcake for both answers.

    So i get for services it would be taxable ..but i want to know for the other two its no gains/losses even though their owner ship is less than 80% in the partnership.

    What the main advantage with 80% ownership verses having less than 80% ownership.. I am trying to visualize how its treated differently.

    FAR 05/27/14; 786/110 - Done !

    #481385
    Kenada
    Member

    Yes that is right Cupcake for both answers.

    So i get for services it would be taxable ..but i want to know for the other two its no gains/losses even though their owner ship is less than 80% in the partnership.

    What the main advantage with 80% ownership verses having less than 80% ownership.. I am trying to visualize how its treated differently.

    FAR 05/27/14; 786/110 - Done !

    #481364
    UCMCPA
    Member

    I thought the 80% ownership rule only applied when forming a Corporation and not a partnership?

    FAR - 84
    AUD - 94
    REG - 86
    BEC - 86

Viewing 15 replies - 2,131 through 2,145 (of 3,212 total)
  • The topic ‘REG Study Group October November 2013 - Page 143’ is closed to new replies.