REG Study Group October November 2013 - Page 135

Viewing 15 replies - 2,011 through 2,025 (of 3,212 total)
  • Author
    Replies
  • #481229
    Skrier
    Member

    Yes that is correct IY. If there were not a disposal, the losses would be suspended and carried forward to offset against passive income until completely used.

    AUD- 84
    FAR- 75
    REG- 78...I am DONE!!!
    BEC- 79

    #481254
    Skrier
    Member

    Yes that is correct IY. If there were not a disposal, the losses would be suspended and carried forward to offset against passive income until completely used.

    AUD- 84
    FAR- 75
    REG- 78...I am DONE!!!
    BEC- 79

    #481231
    Skrier
    Member

    IY..I say D. 45,000

    AUD- 84
    FAR- 75
    REG- 78...I am DONE!!!
    BEC- 79

    #481256
    Skrier
    Member

    IY..I say D. 45,000

    AUD- 84
    FAR- 75
    REG- 78...I am DONE!!!
    BEC- 79

    #481233
    Kenada
    Member

    Answer (D) is correct.

    Sec. 163(d) limits the deduction on investment interest to the amount of net investment income. Investment income includes gross income from property held for investment and any net gain attributable to the disposition of property held for investment, to the extent that such amounts are not derived from the conduct of a trade or business. Capital gain from disposition of investment property is generally not considered investment income. However, individuals may elect to treat the gain as investment income by paying taxes at the ordinary rate. Roth had investment income of $49,000 ($24,000 + $25,000) and investment expenses of $4,000, or net investment income of $45,000. His investment interest deduction is limited to $45,000. The $25,000 of disallowed investment interest ($70,000 – $45,000) may be carried over and treated as investment interest paid or accrued in the succeeding taxable year

    FAR 05/27/14; 786/110 - Done !

    #481258
    Kenada
    Member

    Answer (D) is correct.

    Sec. 163(d) limits the deduction on investment interest to the amount of net investment income. Investment income includes gross income from property held for investment and any net gain attributable to the disposition of property held for investment, to the extent that such amounts are not derived from the conduct of a trade or business. Capital gain from disposition of investment property is generally not considered investment income. However, individuals may elect to treat the gain as investment income by paying taxes at the ordinary rate. Roth had investment income of $49,000 ($24,000 + $25,000) and investment expenses of $4,000, or net investment income of $45,000. His investment interest deduction is limited to $45,000. The $25,000 of disallowed investment interest ($70,000 – $45,000) may be carried over and treated as investment interest paid or accrued in the succeeding taxable year

    FAR 05/27/14; 786/110 - Done !

    #481235
    Kenada
    Member

    it take mes a long long time to figure out the answers LOL .. can you imagine i have only gotten 80 questions done for the whole day. Bl***Y H***L

    FAR 05/27/14; 786/110 - Done !

    #481260
    Kenada
    Member

    it take mes a long long time to figure out the answers LOL .. can you imagine i have only gotten 80 questions done for the whole day. Bl***Y H***L

    FAR 05/27/14; 786/110 - Done !

    #481237
    UCMCPA
    Member

    Woops, D makes complete sense.

    Hopefully I RTFQ tomorrow (read the fucking question).

    FAR - 84
    AUD - 94
    REG - 86
    BEC - 86

    #481262
    UCMCPA
    Member

    Woops, D makes complete sense.

    Hopefully I RTFQ tomorrow (read the fucking question).

    FAR - 84
    AUD - 94
    REG - 86
    BEC - 86

    #481239
    Skrier
    Member

    @IY…..I know what you mean. I did manage 370 questions today, but seems like I should have done many more.

    @UCMCPA….I can relate, of the questions I did today, I got 95% and to think most wrong were silly mistakes, if only I had read the question in its entirety before I selected an answer.

    AUD- 84
    FAR- 75
    REG- 78...I am DONE!!!
    BEC- 79

    #481264
    Skrier
    Member

    @IY…..I know what you mean. I did manage 370 questions today, but seems like I should have done many more.

    @UCMCPA….I can relate, of the questions I did today, I got 95% and to think most wrong were silly mistakes, if only I had read the question in its entirety before I selected an answer.

    AUD- 84
    FAR- 75
    REG- 78...I am DONE!!!
    BEC- 79

    #481241
    Mehwish
    Member

    Thanks everyone!

    Everyone's questions, answers, and explanations are EXTREMELY helpful.

    #481266
    Mehwish
    Member

    Thanks everyone!

    Everyone's questions, answers, and explanations are EXTREMELY helpful.

    #481243
    Kenada
    Member

    Matthews was a cash-basis taxpayer whose records showed the following:

    2012 state and local income taxes withheld

    $1,500

    2012 state estimated income taxes paid December 30, 2012

    400

    2012 federal income taxes withheld

    2,500

    2012 state and local income taxes paid April 17, 2013

    300

    What total amount was Matthews entitled to claim for taxes on her 2012 Schedule A of Form 1040?

    A. $1,500

    B. $1,900

    C. $2,200

    D. $4,700

    FAR 05/27/14; 786/110 - Done !

Viewing 15 replies - 2,011 through 2,025 (of 3,212 total)
  • The topic ‘REG Study Group October November 2013 - Page 135’ is closed to new replies.