REG Study Group October November 2013 - Page 132

Viewing 15 replies - 1,966 through 1,980 (of 3,212 total)
  • Author
    Replies
  • #481208
    Skrier
    Member

    Good Luck tomorrow…let us know how it goes!!

    AUD- 84
    FAR- 75
    REG- 78...I am DONE!!!
    BEC- 79

    #481185
    Kenada
    Member

    Thank you UMCPA – Good Luck!! 🙂

    FAR 05/27/14; 786/110 - Done !

    #481210
    Kenada
    Member

    Thank you UMCPA – Good Luck!! 🙂

    FAR 05/27/14; 786/110 - Done !

    #481187
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    So building on your question UCMCPA…I know Limited Partnerships and Rental are passive…What else? I am am now confused that S-Corp interests can be passive also?

    #481212
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    So building on your question UCMCPA…I know Limited Partnerships and Rental are passive…What else? I am am now confused that S-Corp interests can be passive also?

    #481189
    UCMCPA
    Member

    Income from royalties, real estate, partnerships, s-corps

    FAR - 84
    AUD - 94
    REG - 86
    BEC - 86

    #481214
    UCMCPA
    Member

    Income from royalties, real estate, partnerships, s-corps

    FAR - 84
    AUD - 94
    REG - 86
    BEC - 86

    #481191
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Okay, ya I remeber now. Is it if they materially participate in any of those then it is active income? For Ltd. P-ships and S-corps, is the materialiaty measured by the no. of hours participated (or the other lengthy materiality rules…) or % ownership?

    #481216
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Okay, ya I remeber now. Is it if they materially participate in any of those then it is active income? For Ltd. P-ships and S-corps, is the materialiaty measured by the no. of hours participated (or the other lengthy materiality rules…) or % ownership?

    #481193
    UCMCPA
    Member

    It's not active income, they can just deduct it against their “at-risk” basis in the activity.

    Say taxpayer materially participates in S corp, has a basis of 60,000 and is allocated a 75,000 loss… he can use the full 60,000 to deduct 60,000 of that loss. 15,000 will be suspended and he will have a 0 basis in the partnership

    If he doesn't participate it can only offset other passive income.

    Someone correct me if I”m wrong.

    FAR - 84
    AUD - 94
    REG - 86
    BEC - 86

    #481218
    UCMCPA
    Member

    It's not active income, they can just deduct it against their “at-risk” basis in the activity.

    Say taxpayer materially participates in S corp, has a basis of 60,000 and is allocated a 75,000 loss… he can use the full 60,000 to deduct 60,000 of that loss. 15,000 will be suspended and he will have a 0 basis in the partnership

    If he doesn't participate it can only offset other passive income.

    Someone correct me if I”m wrong.

    FAR - 84
    AUD - 94
    REG - 86
    BEC - 86

    #481195
    Kenada
    Member

    I know for Real Property Trades or Business – an individual may avoid passive activity loss limitation treatment on a rental real estate if these two requirements are met.

    – 50% or more participation

    – 750 hour of service

    FAR 05/27/14; 786/110 - Done !

    #481220
    Kenada
    Member

    I know for Real Property Trades or Business – an individual may avoid passive activity loss limitation treatment on a rental real estate if these two requirements are met.

    – 50% or more participation

    – 750 hour of service

    FAR 05/27/14; 786/110 - Done !

    #481197
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Okay. Ya, this is a bit confusing for me. I just don't think I have ever applied it as a passive activity loss….I have always reduced partnership/s corp basis. I will have to look over this again. Thanks.

    #481222
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Okay. Ya, this is a bit confusing for me. I just don't think I have ever applied it as a passive activity loss….I have always reduced partnership/s corp basis. I will have to look over this again. Thanks.

Viewing 15 replies - 1,966 through 1,980 (of 3,212 total)
  • The topic ‘REG Study Group October November 2013 - Page 132’ is closed to new replies.