REG Study Group October November 2013 - Page 129

Viewing 15 replies - 1,921 through 1,935 (of 3,212 total)
  • Author
    Replies
  • #481139
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    @UCMCPA I thought this was a section 351 though since the problem said he controlled the corporation. In a section 351 transaction a liability is not considered as boot for gain recognition and is only considered boot when calculating basis. If this isn't a 351 transaction then I would agree it is $30,000 gain.

    #481164
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    @UCMCPA I thought this was a section 351 though since the problem said he controlled the corporation. In a section 351 transaction a liability is not considered as boot for gain recognition and is only considered boot when calculating basis. If this isn't a 351 transaction then I would agree it is $30,000 gain.

    #481141
    UCMCPA
    Member

    Blah, I missed the word controlled. Section 357 is actually what exempts the gain recognition on section 351 transfers, in regards to assumption of liabilities.

    I have a corporate tax mid-term the day after I sit for REG 🙁

    FAR - 84
    AUD - 94
    REG - 86
    BEC - 86

    #481166
    UCMCPA
    Member

    Blah, I missed the word controlled. Section 357 is actually what exempts the gain recognition on section 351 transfers, in regards to assumption of liabilities.

    I have a corporate tax mid-term the day after I sit for REG 🙁

    FAR - 84
    AUD - 94
    REG - 86
    BEC - 86

    #481143
    Kenada
    Member

    Baum, an unmarried optometrist and sole proprietor of Optics, buys and maintains a supply of eyeglasses and frames to sell in the ordinary course of business. In 2012, Optics had $350,000 in gross business receipts and its year-end inventory was not subject to the uniform capitalization rules. Baum’s 2012 adjusted gross income was $90,000 and Baum qualified to itemize deductions. During 2012, Baum recorded the following information:

    Business expenses:

    Optics cost of goods sold

    $35,000

    Optics rent expense

    28,000

    Liability insurance premium on Optics

    5,250

    Other expenditures:

    Baum’s self-employment tax

    29,750

    Baum’s self-employment health insurance

    8,750

    Insurance premium on personal residence. In 2012, Baum’s home was totally destroyed by fire. The furniture had an adjusted basis of $14,000 and a fair market value of $11,000. During 2012, Baum collected $3,000 in insurance reimbursement and had no casualty gains during the year.

    2,625

    Qualified 2012 mortgage interest on a loan to acquire a personal residence

    52,500

    Annual interest on a $70,000 5-year home equity loan. The loan was secured by Baum’s home, obtained on January 2, 2012. The fair market value of the home exceeded the mortgage and the home equity loan by a substantial amount. The proceeds were used to purchase a car for personal use.

    3,500

    Points prepaid on January 2, 2012, to acquire the home equity loan

    1,400

    Real estate taxes on personal residence

    2,200

    Estimated payments of 2012 federal income taxes

    13,500

    Local property taxes on the car value, used exclusively for personal use

    300

    What amount should Baum report as 2012 net earnings from self-employment?

    A. $273,000

    B. $260,196

    C. $243,250

    D. $252,000

    I am bit confused here how do they get self employed tax to be 9.235 ? Isn't it 6.2 and 1.45 = 7.65 ?

    Answer (B) is correct.

    The net profit or (loss) from self-employment is the gross business receipts reduced by the business expenses. The net profit or (loss) therefore should be $281,750 ($350,000 gross business receipts – $35,000 cost of goods sold – $28,000 rent expense – $5,250 liability insurance premium). Line 4 on Schedule SE requires the tax preparer to multiply the net profit or (loss) by .9235 ($281,750 × .9235 = $260,196). The net earnings from self-employment should be $260,196.

    FAR 05/27/14; 786/110 - Done !

    #481168
    Kenada
    Member

    Baum, an unmarried optometrist and sole proprietor of Optics, buys and maintains a supply of eyeglasses and frames to sell in the ordinary course of business. In 2012, Optics had $350,000 in gross business receipts and its year-end inventory was not subject to the uniform capitalization rules. Baum’s 2012 adjusted gross income was $90,000 and Baum qualified to itemize deductions. During 2012, Baum recorded the following information:

    Business expenses:

    Optics cost of goods sold

    $35,000

    Optics rent expense

    28,000

    Liability insurance premium on Optics

    5,250

    Other expenditures:

    Baum’s self-employment tax

    29,750

    Baum’s self-employment health insurance

    8,750

    Insurance premium on personal residence. In 2012, Baum’s home was totally destroyed by fire. The furniture had an adjusted basis of $14,000 and a fair market value of $11,000. During 2012, Baum collected $3,000 in insurance reimbursement and had no casualty gains during the year.

    2,625

    Qualified 2012 mortgage interest on a loan to acquire a personal residence

    52,500

    Annual interest on a $70,000 5-year home equity loan. The loan was secured by Baum’s home, obtained on January 2, 2012. The fair market value of the home exceeded the mortgage and the home equity loan by a substantial amount. The proceeds were used to purchase a car for personal use.

    3,500

    Points prepaid on January 2, 2012, to acquire the home equity loan

    1,400

    Real estate taxes on personal residence

    2,200

    Estimated payments of 2012 federal income taxes

    13,500

    Local property taxes on the car value, used exclusively for personal use

    300

    What amount should Baum report as 2012 net earnings from self-employment?

    A. $273,000

    B. $260,196

    C. $243,250

    D. $252,000

    I am bit confused here how do they get self employed tax to be 9.235 ? Isn't it 6.2 and 1.45 = 7.65 ?

    Answer (B) is correct.

    The net profit or (loss) from self-employment is the gross business receipts reduced by the business expenses. The net profit or (loss) therefore should be $281,750 ($350,000 gross business receipts – $35,000 cost of goods sold – $28,000 rent expense – $5,250 liability insurance premium). Line 4 on Schedule SE requires the tax preparer to multiply the net profit or (loss) by .9235 ($281,750 × .9235 = $260,196). The net earnings from self-employment should be $260,196.

    FAR 05/27/14; 786/110 - Done !

    #481145
    UCMCPA
    Member

    IY247,

    If you take 1.00 or 100% and subtract the 7.65 or .0765%, it ends up being .9235 or 92.35%. The .765 is subtracted out to give the taxpayer the credit for the 1/2 self employment tax.

    FAR - 84
    AUD - 94
    REG - 86
    BEC - 86

    #481170
    UCMCPA
    Member

    IY247,

    If you take 1.00 or 100% and subtract the 7.65 or .0765%, it ends up being .9235 or 92.35%. The .765 is subtracted out to give the taxpayer the credit for the 1/2 self employment tax.

    FAR - 84
    AUD - 94
    REG - 86
    BEC - 86

    #481147
    UCMCPA
    Member

    Less than 24 hours until I'm in the testing center.

    I'm ignoring my tax mid-term because I found out it's open book, which means it's going to be hard, but oh well. This is far more important.

    FAR - 84
    AUD - 94
    REG - 86
    BEC - 86

    #481172
    UCMCPA
    Member

    Less than 24 hours until I'm in the testing center.

    I'm ignoring my tax mid-term because I found out it's open book, which means it's going to be hard, but oh well. This is far more important.

    FAR - 84
    AUD - 94
    REG - 86
    BEC - 86

    #481149
    Skrier
    Member

    @UCMCPA….Good Luck tomorrow….although with all the help you have provided in this forum over the past few weeks, I don't think you will need luck, you will do fine 🙂 Good luck on your mid-term as well. I don't miss those days, finished my Maters program this past June, so I know how hard it is to work and have classes and prepare for this exam!!!

    AUD- 84
    FAR- 75
    REG- 78...I am DONE!!!
    BEC- 79

    #481174
    Skrier
    Member

    @UCMCPA….Good Luck tomorrow….although with all the help you have provided in this forum over the past few weeks, I don't think you will need luck, you will do fine 🙂 Good luck on your mid-term as well. I don't miss those days, finished my Maters program this past June, so I know how hard it is to work and have classes and prepare for this exam!!!

    AUD- 84
    FAR- 75
    REG- 78...I am DONE!!!
    BEC- 79

    #481151
    UCMCPA
    Member

    I'd rather be studying for the exam in school than while having to work public accounting lol.

    FAR - 84
    AUD - 94
    REG - 86
    BEC - 86

    #481176
    UCMCPA
    Member

    I'd rather be studying for the exam in school than while having to work public accounting lol.

    FAR - 84
    AUD - 94
    REG - 86
    BEC - 86

    #481153
    Kenada
    Member

    Thank you UMCPA!! I haven't done a calculation that way but OK.. I see this now 🙂

    I am weak with Self Employment Tax etc

    today I am just focusing on all tax topics.. I need to get my Game on on Tax before i revisit B law tomorrow 🙂

    Good Luck for Tomorrow. I have a good feeling you will do well.

    FAR 05/27/14; 786/110 - Done !

Viewing 15 replies - 1,921 through 1,935 (of 3,212 total)
  • The topic ‘REG Study Group October November 2013 - Page 129’ is closed to new replies.