REG Study Group October November 2013 - Page 108

Viewing 15 replies - 1,606 through 1,620 (of 3,212 total)
  • Author
    Replies
  • #480849
    Future_FLCPA
    Member

    boot is the cash also received in the transfer

    B - 80 (Aug 2012)
    A - 89 (Jan 2013)
    F - 77 (May 2013)
    R - 83 (Nov 2013)

    #480822
    UCMCPA
    Member

    Cash or other property received; including the other party assuming any liabilities on the related asset.

    FAR - 84
    AUD - 94
    REG - 86
    BEC - 86

    #480851
    UCMCPA
    Member

    Cash or other property received; including the other party assuming any liabilities on the related asset.

    FAR - 84
    AUD - 94
    REG - 86
    BEC - 86

    #480824
    UCMCPA
    Member

    and a 75 on my 2nd final exam

    FAR - 84
    AUD - 94
    REG - 86
    BEC - 86

    #480853
    UCMCPA
    Member

    and a 75 on my 2nd final exam

    FAR - 84
    AUD - 94
    REG - 86
    BEC - 86

    #480826
    jpowell31
    Participant

    Section 179: Can someone give me an example with the updated numbers ($500k/$2Mil)? Sorry if this is silly I just find it easier for things to stick with examples confirmed in my head since I'm retaking REG and the old numbers keep taunting me. I know that anything over $2M reduces your deduction of $500k $ for $ but one of Becker's examples go like this with the old numbers:

    Deduction: $125k

    Purchases: $950k

    Max allowed: ($500k)

    Excess: ($450k)

    Allowable 179 ded. $0

    So would this go like this with the new numbers?:

    Deduction: $500k

    Purchases: $950k

    Max allowed: ($2M)

    Excess: ($1.050M)

    Allowable 179 ded. $0

    Or similarly:

    Deduction: $500k

    Purchases: $2.1M

    Max allowed:($2M)

    Excess: ($100k)

    Allowable 179 ded. $400k

    Thanks!

    #480855
    jpowell31
    Participant

    Section 179: Can someone give me an example with the updated numbers ($500k/$2Mil)? Sorry if this is silly I just find it easier for things to stick with examples confirmed in my head since I'm retaking REG and the old numbers keep taunting me. I know that anything over $2M reduces your deduction of $500k $ for $ but one of Becker's examples go like this with the old numbers:

    Deduction: $125k

    Purchases: $950k

    Max allowed: ($500k)

    Excess: ($450k)

    Allowable 179 ded. $0

    So would this go like this with the new numbers?:

    Deduction: $500k

    Purchases: $950k

    Max allowed: ($2M)

    Excess: ($1.050M)

    Allowable 179 ded. $0

    Or similarly:

    Deduction: $500k

    Purchases: $2.1M

    Max allowed:($2M)

    Excess: ($100k)

    Allowable 179 ded. $400k

    Thanks!

    #480828
    jpowell31
    Participant

    Ok so the formatting on that question didn't exactly come out how I wanted it to! Hopefully it makes sense to those of you well into your studies! Exams on Saturday so ironing out any kinks for no excuses entering the exam room!

    #480857
    jpowell31
    Participant

    Ok so the formatting on that question didn't exactly come out how I wanted it to! Hopefully it makes sense to those of you well into your studies! Exams on Saturday so ironing out any kinks for no excuses entering the exam room!

    #480830
    UCMCPA
    Member

    Deduction: $500k

    Purchases: $950k

    Max allowed: $2M

    Excess: 0

    Allowable 179 ded. $500k

    Or similarly:

    Deduction: $500k

    Purchases: $2.1M

    Max allowed:($2M)

    Excess: ($100k)

    Allowable 179 ded. $400k

    fixed it for you

    FAR - 84
    AUD - 94
    REG - 86
    BEC - 86

    #480859
    UCMCPA
    Member

    Deduction: $500k

    Purchases: $950k

    Max allowed: $2M

    Excess: 0

    Allowable 179 ded. $500k

    Or similarly:

    Deduction: $500k

    Purchases: $2.1M

    Max allowed:($2M)

    Excess: ($100k)

    Allowable 179 ded. $400k

    fixed it for you

    FAR - 84
    AUD - 94
    REG - 86
    BEC - 86

    #480832
    OCDisME
    Member

    @ jpowell31 Good luck on your exam…we test on the same day! And thanks for posting that question…I find it helpful because I really didn't see too may sec 179 practice questions.

    Becker Online - IL Candidate

    FAR: 85
    AUD: 85
    BEC: 78
    REG: 90

    #480861
    OCDisME
    Member

    @ jpowell31 Good luck on your exam…we test on the same day! And thanks for posting that question…I find it helpful because I really didn't see too may sec 179 practice questions.

    Becker Online - IL Candidate

    FAR: 85
    AUD: 85
    BEC: 78
    REG: 90

    #480834
    Skrier
    Member

    Can someone explain the calculation for wash sale so I can understand it…

    AUD- 84
    FAR- 75
    REG- 78...I am DONE!!!
    BEC- 79

    #480863
    Skrier
    Member

    Can someone explain the calculation for wash sale so I can understand it…

    AUD- 84
    FAR- 75
    REG- 78...I am DONE!!!
    BEC- 79

Viewing 15 replies - 1,606 through 1,620 (of 3,212 total)
  • The topic ‘REG Study Group October November 2013 - Page 108’ is closed to new replies.