REG Study Group October November 2013 - Page 106

Viewing 15 replies - 1,576 through 1,590 (of 3,212 total)
  • Author
    Replies
  • #480819
    OCDisME
    Member

    @Qlad and UCMCPA regarding the Education Tax Incentives…do you have any good mnemonics or anything to help remember it? I barely glanced over it during studying, and I think there was maybe 1 or 2 questions on MCQ.

    @UCMCPA I just took my first Becker Practice Exam and by averaging everything, I got an 84. I wish this is how the actual exam was scored! I was thrown by some of the MCQ and Sims…they hardly covered a couple things in lecture and during homework MCQ and then they throw these MCQ in to the practice exam?! WTF!!!

    Becker Online - IL Candidate

    FAR: 85
    AUD: 85
    BEC: 78
    REG: 90

    #480792
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    There is no $500,000 limit as an answer choice? That is what I would think it is.

    #480821
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    There is no $500,000 limit as an answer choice? That is what I would think it is.

    #480794
    OCDisME
    Member

    @Qlad…B is the correct answer.

    Becker Online - IL Candidate

    FAR: 85
    AUD: 85
    BEC: 78
    REG: 90

    #480823
    OCDisME
    Member

    @Qlad…B is the correct answer.

    Becker Online - IL Candidate

    FAR: 85
    AUD: 85
    BEC: 78
    REG: 90

    #480796
    UCMCPA
    Member

    I think the AGI is a distraction in that problem and you only use the 950,000. Since the answer using the updated rules is not an option, I would assume it's the old rules of a max of 125,000 and phase out begins at 500,000. I'm not sure if it's a dollar for dollar phase out, I believe it is under the new rules so I would assume it is for the old.

    I would pick B.

    Allowable deduction 125,000

    Machinery 950,000

    (Phase out) 500,000

    Reduction in deduction 450,000

    125,000 – 450,000… does not compute.

    Now if it's not dollar for dollar then I messed up lol

    FAR - 84
    AUD - 94
    REG - 86
    BEC - 86

    #480825
    UCMCPA
    Member

    I think the AGI is a distraction in that problem and you only use the 950,000. Since the answer using the updated rules is not an option, I would assume it's the old rules of a max of 125,000 and phase out begins at 500,000. I'm not sure if it's a dollar for dollar phase out, I believe it is under the new rules so I would assume it is for the old.

    I would pick B.

    Allowable deduction 125,000

    Machinery 950,000

    (Phase out) 500,000

    Reduction in deduction 450,000

    125,000 – 450,000… does not compute.

    Now if it's not dollar for dollar then I messed up lol

    FAR - 84
    AUD - 94
    REG - 86
    BEC - 86

    #480798
    UCMCPA
    Member

    @OCDisMe

    I look at it… for the AOC, you get to take it every OPPORTUNITY you can. The LL credit you only get ONCE in a lifetime.

    @cupcake- you are mixing the updated with the old rules

    FAR - 84
    AUD - 94
    REG - 86
    BEC - 86

    #480827
    UCMCPA
    Member

    @OCDisMe

    I look at it… for the AOC, you get to take it every OPPORTUNITY you can. The LL credit you only get ONCE in a lifetime.

    @cupcake- you are mixing the updated with the old rules

    FAR - 84
    AUD - 94
    REG - 86
    BEC - 86

    #480800
    OCDisME
    Member

    I just had this sec 179 question in my practice exam and got it wrong because I barely studied this section. The calculation is:

    $125,000 is the max deduction, and it cannot be taken if there is a loss or to create a loss.

    Reduced dollar for dollar by the excess of $500,000…so: $950,000 less $500,000 = $450,000

    125,000 less 450,000 = -325,000, therefore no deduction allowed.

    Becker Online - IL Candidate

    FAR: 85
    AUD: 85
    BEC: 78
    REG: 90

    #480829
    OCDisME
    Member

    I just had this sec 179 question in my practice exam and got it wrong because I barely studied this section. The calculation is:

    $125,000 is the max deduction, and it cannot be taken if there is a loss or to create a loss.

    Reduced dollar for dollar by the excess of $500,000…so: $950,000 less $500,000 = $450,000

    125,000 less 450,000 = -325,000, therefore no deduction allowed.

    Becker Online - IL Candidate

    FAR: 85
    AUD: 85
    BEC: 78
    REG: 90

    #480802
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    @UCMCPA…That would be correct though under the new rules though, right? So for 2012, it is $125,000 Section 179 expense on a max purchase of $500,000. And 2013 it is $500,000 section 179 expense for a max of $2,000,000 in purchases?

    #480831
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    @UCMCPA…That would be correct though under the new rules though, right? So for 2012, it is $125,000 Section 179 expense on a max purchase of $500,000. And 2013 it is $500,000 section 179 expense for a max of $2,000,000 in purchases?

    #480804
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Why don't I understand basis for gains and stock?!?!? :'(

    #480833
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Why don't I understand basis for gains and stock?!?!? :'(

Viewing 15 replies - 1,576 through 1,590 (of 3,212 total)
  • The topic ‘REG Study Group October November 2013 - Page 106’ is closed to new replies.