REG Study Group July August 2017 - Page 72

  • Creator
    Topic
  • #1563001
    jeff
    Keymaster

    Welcome to the Q3 2017 CPA Exam Study Group for REG. 🙂

    Introduce yourselves and let your fellow NINJAs know when you plan to take your REG exam.

    The Five Steps (NINJA Framework): https://www.another71.com/pass-the-cpa-exam/

Viewing 15 replies - 1,066 through 1,080 (of 1,171 total)
  • Author
    Replies
  • #1614602
    HoldMyBeerCPA
    Participant

    @passan: Hehe, I think smart may be an overstatement, but thank you 🙂

    #1614603
    pharaoh
    Participant

    oooh he provided the service AND provided an asset. I misread it, I thought he received an asset from the partnership. Yes @TurboSandwichCPA, that's right

    FAR 8/2016
    AUD 1/2017
    REG TBD
    BEC TBD

    #1614617
    kala
    Participant

    Any idea, which areas of Blaw are most frequently tested? I feel pretty comfortable with tax portion/ethics but not Blaw. Any suggestion of areas that I should for sure know in Blaw. thanks.

    #1614629
    pcunniff
    Participant

    If a co-surety (a) pays the entire obligation and the other co-surety(b) goes into bankruptcy, (a) cannot recover ANYTHING from (b). There was a skills practice question that said this:

    Carlos asked rick and peter to guarantee carlow's debt to Gord Motors. Both rick and peter act as sureties. The contract that all parties signed provides that ricks max liability is 30k, and Peters is 20k. Carlos owes Gord 20k and is in default. Rick pays Gord Motors the entire amount. Rick then discovers Peter has filed for bankruptcy and all debts have been discharged. How much can rick recover from peter?

    ANSWER: $0!!!!!

    I find this crazy. Couldn't a co-surety involuntarily file for bankruptcy? I would consider doing this if i didn't like the other guy.

    #1614675
    Lamis
    Participant

    Brand New, Inc., was organized and began active business on January 2, Year 5. Brand New incurred the following expenses in connection with creating the business:

    State incorporation fees $ 5,000
    Legal fees for drafting the charter 35,000
    Printing costs for stock certificates 10,000
    Professional fees for issuance of stock 15,000
    Broker's commission on sale of stock 25,000
    Expense for the temporary directors 20,000
    ——–
    Total $110,000

    What is the maximum amount of organization expense that Brand New may deduct on its Year 5 tax return?
    $4,000
    $5,000
    $8,667
    $12,000
    Guys need ur help in this one

    #1614683
    joonpark1212
    Participant

    Recognized gain from Like-Kind Exchange…. is it an ordinary gain or a capital gain? The book only illustrates it as a ‘Gain'. I would appreciate if someone could share their knowledge. Thanks.

    #1614720
    blueselp
    Participant

    Lamis, I am not 100% sure but maybe the answer is $8,667…

    State incorporation fees $ 5,000
    Legal fees for drafting the charter 35,000
    Expense for the temporary directors 20,000

    Total expense relating to setting up the company: 60,000
    $5,000 is allowed immediately and the rest is allocated over 180 months.

    55,000 / 180 = 305.56 x 12 (for year 5) = 3,667 plus 5,000 = 8,667.

    #1614771
    Lamis
    Participant

    @blueselp no I did the same mistake like u
    But it's telling me the correct answer is $4000
    There's a phase out for the $5,000 after $50,000 expenses but I don't know how to calculate the phase out

    #1614792
    kala
    Participant

    Any org cost over 50,000 should be amortized over 180 months. which means, 60,000/180=333*12= 4000 rounded.

    For the phase out you will have to reduce the 5,000 with the dollar amount that exceeded 50,000. for example if the org cost are 52,000. then the calculation goes.

    (5000-2000)+(52000-3000)/180=3000+49000/180= 3000+272*12=6264.

    Please correct if anyone think that's not right.

    #1614800
    Lamis
    Participant

    @kala I still don't understand , so should I amortize the whole amount directly by 180 months or deduct the phased out 5000 and then amortize the rest over 180 months
    I'm so confused , can u explain more?

    #1614816
    kala
    Participant

    Org cost that do not exceed 50,000 have a initial year deduction of 5,000 and the total expenses are reduced by 5,000 remaining amortized over 180 months.

    Phase out begins at 50,000 and ends at 55,000 where 5,000 is completely reduced and anything over 55,000 is directly amortized over 180. for Instance. IF the org cost is 55,000. then the calculation goes.

    (5,000-5,000)+ (55,000-0)/180.

    5,000 reduced because 55,000-50,000 limit.
    0 reduced because you have no deducted anything as a direct expense.

    I hope this makes sense and this is from my understanding. if anyone else thinks that's not correct please write, I have my exam in a week . :).

    #1614818
    blueselp
    Participant
    #1614854
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    @kala , great explanation!

    @blueselp, that link is awesome, very good info.

    @lamis , this confused me somewhat too, I'm using Gleim and the information in the outline, and in the MCQs, is kinda unclear.

    I have another general question relating to this:

    Start-up and organizational costs are treated separately correct?

    So hypothetically if you started a business, and incorporated it in the same year, and your start-up expenses were exactly $5,000 and your organizational expenses were exactly $5,000 , then you would deduct $10,000 total for start-up and organizational costs?

    #1614870
    Lamis
    Participant

    @kala that makes sense now thank u for the great explanation and additional info.
    these details are not included in Becker's materials !
    Hopefully I'll be able to take the exam this testing window too& not be surprised of questions outside Becker's course
    @benj2017 I seriously don't know what kind of course guarantees all the info that we need to know for the exam, obviously none of them! We just have to get some info from here and there to cover all what we have to know to pass the exam

    #1614876
    2017cpa
    Participant

    @lamis thank you for the help you are amazing

    So if you purchase an item in the first quarter but don't put it into service until the last quarter then you would use the 1st quarter mid-quarter convention table

    That makes so much sense…I really appreciate the help

Viewing 15 replies - 1,066 through 1,080 (of 1,171 total)
  • The topic ‘REG Study Group July August 2017 - Page 72’ is closed to new replies.