REG Study Group July August 2017 - Page 47

Viewing 15 replies - 691 through 705 (of 1,171 total)
  • Author
    Replies
  • #1590479
    gguzman
    Participant

    Is one SIM one tab, or is one sim multiple tabs?

    #1590489
    hccpa
    Participant

    I could really use some help/encouragement. I take REG on Saturday and I'm not confident at all, even though I'm trying to be. I'm consistently scoring in the upper 70s/lower 80s on Becker progress tests but I feel like I'm going to get beat up by the SIMS. Any advice on studying for SIMS and for these last few days of studying in general? Do progress tests even accurately give an idea of preparedness? My only plan so far is to keep cranking out progress tests and reviewing my weakest areas according to those. Any advice is greatly appreciated!!

    #1590503
    gguzman
    Participant

    @hccpa Not sure if you have listened to any of Jeff's podcasts, but I have heard people In your position ask that exact question. Jeff generally puts a high emphasis on MCQ's, and only doing SIMS if you have the extra time. His logic is that you are able to study more material even faster with MCQ's than with SIMS.

    I was skeptical of this method, but I have implemented what he said and I am having a much easier time doing the SIMS. I am not sure if you are working or not, or your situation but what I would do is harness your freaking out cause your test is on Saturday out into a giant ball of motivation to soak up as much REG knowledge that you can before your exam.

    #1590582
    Holly
    Participant

    @gguzman I think one sim is one tab, and one testlet is multiple simulations, for a total of 8 simulations for REG

    BEC - 79
    REG - 85
    AUD - 5/27/16

    #1590585
    Holly
    Participant

    @gguzman I don't listen to those podcasts so thanks for the advice! I feel like I have a little direction this morning.

    BEC - 79
    REG - 85
    AUD - 5/27/16

    #1590599
    gguzman
    Participant

    @Holly Glad I could help! His Podcasts are pretty cool. Don't think you will have any down time until after your exam, but you should check them out when you can.

    #1590615
    Holly
    Participant

    Here are a few things I got wrong this morning:

    section 1244 – only available to original owners and still applies to inherited stock, MFJ the deduction is $50k each
    Losses are not treated as losses in entity/owner transactions
    Keough plan deductible contribution – when to use 20% or 25%

    BEC - 79
    REG - 85
    AUD - 5/27/16

    #1590638
    JB
    Participant

    Here's a question.

    Nancy, who is single, formed a corporation during 2011 using a tax‐free asset transfer that qualified under Sec. 351. She transferred property having an adjusted basis of $80,000 and a fair market value of $60,000, and in exchange received Sec. 1244 small business corporation stock. During February 2017, Nancy sold all of her stock for $35,000. What is the amount and character of Nancy's recognized loss resulting from the sale of the stock in 2017?

    A. $0 ordinary loss; $45,000 capital loss.
    B. $25,000 ordinary loss; $10,000 capital loss.
    C. $25,000 ordinary loss; $20,000 capital loss.
    D. $45,000 ordinary loss; $0 capital loss.

    #1590641
    jtvande
    Participant

    @Holly I got the same things wrong. I feel good about the concepts just trying to nail down all the phaseouts and exceptions now.

    #1590648
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    as someone who took REG last week, I totally agree with not spending too much time doing SIMS. I found doing SIMS for audit extremely beneficial as it complimented MCQ whereas having done them all multiple time between Becker and Ninja for REG, I can say that NOTHING could have prepared me for the SIMS on the test…They weren't even that hard, but convoluted and some were on subjects I don't recall seeing or paying attention to in my studies!!!! The wait for this score is going to kill me!

    #1590651
    CPAIN2K17
    Participant

    @JB C

    Her basis is 80,000, so the total loss is 80,000-35,000 = 45,000

    Since the FMV was below her basis when she transferred the stock, she has to use the FMV to calculate the amount of loss that can be ordinary loss. So 60,000-35,000 = 25,000 ordinary loss.

    The remaining 20,000 is a capital loss (the amount of her basis over the FMV when transferred).

    #1590666
    Holly
    Participant

    @JB I say C, too

    BEC - 79
    REG - 85
    AUD - 5/27/16

    #1590671
    JB
    Participant

    @CPAIN2K17 and @Holly you guys are correct.

    #1590692
    Holly
    Participant

    Is anyone going to be testing Friday with me?

    BEC - 79
    REG - 85
    AUD - 5/27/16

    #1590723
    NVeg
    Participant

    @Holly I wish with my schedule I was able to time it better and take Regulation this month. I test late August so it'll be hard not to look at the score release once the Quarter 2 scores come in mid-August.

Viewing 15 replies - 691 through 705 (of 1,171 total)
  • The topic ‘REG Study Group July August 2017 - Page 47’ is closed to new replies.