REG Study Group July August 2017 - Page 45

Viewing 15 replies - 661 through 675 (of 1,171 total)
  • Author
    Replies
  • #1589787
    CPAIN2K17
    Participant

    @jtvande how do you get answers 1 and 4 on sim #5? I can only get 2 and 3.

    #1589789
    Holly
    Participant

    So now I'm back to thinking about the exchange in the last question on sim 5. There was a deferred loss and those get added to basis, so the basis is the original basis plus the deferred loss($25,388)??

    EDITED

    BEC - 79
    REG - 85
    AUD - 5/27/16

    #1589790
    jesswink92
    Participant

    Thanks Holly! I totally forgot about the .5 for the year of sale.

    #1589792
    Holly
    Participant

    I'll give the first one a try of explaining for #5:

    involuntary conversion –
    old property $63,000 (new property's basis should be this increased by any additional amounts invested)
    new property value $71,800 according to letter, actual amount paid is $72,563 (according to HUD) = $763 over investment
    = $63,763

    BEC - 79
    REG - 85
    AUD - 5/27/16

    #1589793
    CPAIN2K17
    Participant

    Thank you @Holly!

    #1589796
    Holly
    Participant

    They could at least give us explanations. I always leave this part blank because I never get to the sample test before I actually sit. Now I can complain about no explanations! 😉

    BEC - 79
    REG - 85
    AUD - 5/27/16

    #1589802
    jtvande
    Participant

    this is a summary of the explanation from my book, had to do it really quickly hopefully it helps.

    1. Is an involuntary conversion, treated like a like-kind exchange, you have to get the 1033 part from the auth lit. the realized gain on the involuntary conversion is 8,800. [71800 proceeds (per letter) – 63,000 adjusted basis of land given up(shown on depr schedule)]

    The 8800 gain is recognized only to the extent of the 71800 cash proceeds are not reinvested in like kind property. Cost of replacement property is 72563 (they capitalized real estate taxes per memo). which exceeds the 71800 received so no gain is recognized. However since the gain is postponed a basis adjustment is required for the replacement property. Correct cost of replacement is 63763.

    3. the manufacturing equipment the extended warranty is not a cost necessary to acquire the asset and prepare it for its intended use so it is not capitalized. Amount capitalized is the 205,600.

    4. Reduce FMV of the new asset acquired, 32,300 as per the invoice, by the deferred gain of 6,912 that is part of this section 1031 like kind exchange. The deferred gain is the difference between the 32,300 in like kind property received and the 25388 in total consideration given up, which consists of the old van with an adjusted basis of 2088 (18125 cost – 16037 accumulated depreciation) plus the 23300 in cash paid.

    #1589816
    Holly
    Participant

    @jtvande thanks so much!

    BEC - 79
    REG - 85
    AUD - 5/27/16

    #1589844

    For Beckers 351 exchange Sim in R4, Sim 1, tab 2 (Balance Sheet).

    Why isnt the corporations basis in the asset 50,000? Isn't it the greater of the liability or the basis of the asset?

    Therefore, 50,000 > 40,000? Becker says it is 40,000 but I dont understand why????

    #1589847

    I'm referring to the shareholder Mitchel in that sim, btw.

    #1589922
    Scared-cpa
    Participant

    Are we supposed to study with 2016 numbers or 2017 numbers? CPAexcel is using 2016 indexes but now I'm wondering if the exam will have 2017 numbers that have been indexed for inflation or if any numbers that change year to year will just be given to us.

    #1590029
    sara
    Participant

    I'm taking REG on September 10th. I just had FAR yesterday and found the TBS long and hard. My main concern is the TBS. Does anyone have any suggestions as to which course's TBS is somewhat close to the exam? I have Roger right now, but I'm not sure it's enough to prepare for the longer TBS on REG. Thank you.

    #1590032
    CPA8675309
    Participant

    I sat for REG today. Saying it was difficult is an understatement. I followed the study plan that has been successful for me so far with this exam, but it failed me for REG. I felt like the questions on the actual test were much more difficult overall than what I saw in Wiley and Ninja. I would say the subjects tested overall followed pretty closely with the AICPA blueprint (as far as their %'s). The questions in the exam had more twists than I was used to. My advice is to know the material inside and out and don't skip over anything. If I have to retake this one, I'm thinking about getting Gleim since I just read that it contains more difficult questions.

    Oh yeah, the sims were much more involved as well. At least I'm done with my “last” test and can relax until I find out my results for AUD and REG.

    Good luck everyone!

    #1590051
    Cyn
    Participant

    @CPA8675309 best of luck. thanks so much for the tips!

    #1590062

    FAR Test Your Might – Be sure to answer in the facebook thread to be eligible to win!

Viewing 15 replies - 661 through 675 (of 1,171 total)
  • The topic ‘REG Study Group July August 2017 - Page 45’ is closed to new replies.