REG Study Group July August 2017 - Page 43

Viewing 15 replies - 631 through 645 (of 1,171 total)
  • Author
    Replies
  • #1589355
    Holly
    Participant

    @cpain2k17 ugh I know!!!! I emailed Becker to see what their response is. NINJA MCQ also had some questions with 179 included in total depreciation but if I remember right, the limitation was included in the question.

    BEC - 79
    REG - 85
    AUD - 5/27/16

    #1589360
    Anthony
    Participant

    I'm not if people notice, but the IRS site is outdated. It says 2016 NOT 2017.

    #1589364
    CPAIN2K17
    Participant

    @anothony yeah if you look at the section 179 website, it says it stayed the same for 2017. I posted both links.

    #1589372
    Holly
    Participant

    @Anthony it actually says for tax years beginning 2016.

    Dollar Limits

    The total amount you can elect to deduct under section 179 for most property placed in service in tax years beginning in 2016 generally cannot be more than $500,000. If you acquire and place in service more than one item of qualifying property during the year, you can allocate the section 179 deduction among the items in any way, as long as the total deduction is not more than $500,000. You do not have to claim the full $500,000.

    BEC - 79
    REG - 85
    AUD - 5/27/16

    #1589436
    Operation_CPA
    Participant

    Another super simple question: Why is the $8,000 distribution not taken @ 50% to be $4,000. Thanks!

    Johnson, an individual, has a 50% interest in DEF Partnership. Johnson's adjusted basis at the beginning of the year was $14,000. The partnership's ordinary income for the current year was $6,000. Johnson received a nonliquidating distribution of $8,000 cash, and property with an adjusted basis of $12,000 and a fair market value of $15,000. What is the basis of the distributed property, other than cash, to Johnson?

    a. $6,000

    b. $15,000

    c. $9,000

    d. $12,000

    #1589442
    passantsalama
    Participant

    @operation cpa
    Because the 8000 is distributed to johnson only not all the partners.

    #1589501
    Holly
    Participant

    I got my answer from Becker on section 179:

    Holly,
    Notice the book says 2016. It says that because the reg had not changed and we knew it might after the printing of the book. Yes it has been changed in 2017 500,000/2M
    Steve Goldstein CPA

    Does anyone's book say 2016? Mine doesn't; mine says 2017.

    BEC - 79
    REG - 85
    AUD - 5/27/16

    #1589513

    Holly,

    My original response to you was based of what I had read in the Becker section for 179. My book says 2017.

    #1589522
    CPAIN2K17
    Participant

    Here is Wiley's excerpt on sec 179(it says 510K for 2017 lol)

    Section 179 Election—
    There is a Section 179 election to expense a limited amount of tangible personalty if used in a trade activity. It is not available for income-producing property (i.e., rental property) or real property (i.e., real estate).

    Note that Section 179 expensing is taken into account before bonus depreciation for years that permitted bonus depreciation. Off-the-shelf computer software also qualifies under Section 179, as does qualified leasehold property, qualified restaurant property, and qualified retail improvement property. Air conditioning and heating units also qualify.

    1.The maximum amount expensed in any year is limited to the lesser of business income or $510,000 for 2017 ($500,000 for 2016).
    2.The Section 179 expense cannot exceed the income from the business, reduced for all expenses except Section 179. Any election to expense in excess of the business income limit is carried forward (indefinitely) and used in a year when income is sufficient.
    3.The Section 179 election is phased out (dollar for dollar) if qualified assets purchased exceed $2,030,000 for 2017 ($2,010,000 for 2016).

    #1589549
    Holly
    Participant

    Okay, so we stick to 2016 numbers. I honestly don't think there will be a situation where we'd have to choose between either.

    BEC - 79
    REG - 85
    AUD - 5/27/16

    #1589558
    CPAIN2K17
    Participant

    I agree, I don't think knowing the exact number matters for the exam. Just knowing the rule and how to apply it.

    #1589583

    Even if they do give us a question where we have to use either 5,000,000 or 5,010,000, im sure only one of them will give you a given answer in the choices.

    #1589613
    Holly
    Participant

    I have taken both Becker Mock Exams. With each test I had something happen where I couldn't complete it the first go round so I haven't really kept up with my scores, but the mistakes I have made were just that – mistakes. Mistakes because I'm not reading the freaking question.

    BEC - 79
    REG - 85
    AUD - 5/27/16

    #1589622
    jesswink92
    Participant

    Has anyone done the AICPA practice exam? I cannot for the life of me figure all of them out. Sim 2 and 5 are giving me the worst trouble. Can anyone explain them to me? I test tomorrow and to say I'm freaking out would be an understatement…

    #1589628
    Holly
    Participant

    @jesswink92 I've done them forever ago. I'll look again and see if I can explain. I remember them being weird.

    BEC - 79
    REG - 85
    AUD - 5/27/16

Viewing 15 replies - 631 through 645 (of 1,171 total)
  • The topic ‘REG Study Group July August 2017 - Page 43’ is closed to new replies.