REG Study Group July August 2017 - Page 31

Viewing 15 replies - 451 through 465 (of 1,171 total)
  • Author
    Replies
  • #1584361
    Holly
    Participant

    Research questions – Say you find the answer in IRC Sec 199(c)(1) – The section is 199, the paragraph is the whole thing Sec 199(c)(1), what is Sec(c)?

    BEC - 79
    REG - 85
    AUD - 5/27/16

    #1584400
    Holly
    Participant

    is (c) a subsection?

    BEC - 79
    REG - 85
    AUD - 5/27/16

    #1584443
    jweeks21
    Participant

    @CPAIN2K17

    I hope so. It just sucks that we won't know if we passed until September. I'll have taken 3 out of the 4 sections of the CPA exam before knowing if I even passed the first lol. Just gotta keep trucking I guess!

    #1584451
    JB
    Participant

    @Holly
    199 c is the subsection

    #1584502
    Holly
    Participant

    @thanks JB I just needed to be sure; I got a few research questions wrong because I wasn't reading what they were asking, and then not knowing what each part is called.

    BEC - 79
    REG - 85
    AUD - 5/27/16

    #1584574
    wakefern58
    Participant

    Hi All – Quick question about C Corp formation that I can't seem to figure out.

    If the 80% control test does not apply (No 351 treatment):

    1)Are the types of Boot Received the same as they are when 351 Treatment does apply (Boot = Cash, FMV nonmoney boot, Excess of Liabilities over basis of contributions)? So if property is contributed it would be the FMV + These 3 BOOT – NBV of Asset = Gain Recognized ?

    2) Can a shareholder recognize a loss in non351 treatment?

    THANK YOU =}

    #1584586
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    I don't know.. For corporation, if FMV is below NBV on transfer of property, corporation has to take FMV to prevent taking on the property with built-in losses (Becker section on Corporate Formation). Subsequent transfer of stock in Entity/Owner transactions section says the shareholder recognized gain or loss on transfer of property….

    #1584701
    Scared-cpa
    Participant

    Hello! When do you guys usually schedule your exam?

    I just got into the assessment phase of Ninja so I am still learning and plan to answer all questions once in 10 days or so from now. I'm trending 65, which I know is awful but I've still got a lot of learning to do. I thought I should schedule my exam about a week before I actually want to sit? I can usually get a seat that close at my Prometric, but not always the best time. I just want to make sure I am as prepared as I possibly can be to reduce any chances of failing and having to do a retake.

    Thought/opinions?

    #1584824
    passantsalama
    Participant

    @summer
    I always schedule my test when im about 80% sure that i understand the material to do my best

    #1584896
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    I usually schedule my test as soon as I have my NTS, this way I keep studying! If I waited until I was ready I would never take it, plus the spots fill up quite quickly where I am!

    #1584901
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    I have a week until my exam (next Thursday). overall, I feel good, but BLAW in Ninja is killing me-I feel like the extent of it in Becker isn't as much (sales agreements, third party assignments aren't covered in Becker at all…) I scored 90 on a 76 question progress test in Becker yesterday, covering all chapters, but don't want to be overconfident…. For those who might have taken it before, does Becker cover BLAW well? I don't want to have to delve more into it than I have to…I still plan on getting through most of Ninja in BLAW anyway, just to be exposed to different questions….

    #1584955
    pcunniff
    Participant

    @Holly, I think you're stressing out too much over a research question. Just understand what its asking and type in the key words. You'll find it from there if you don't stress and just read.

    #1584958
    Holly
    Participant

    @pcunniff I only got those research questions wrong because it specifically asked for certain parts and I didn't know which part of 199(c)(1) to omit. I was in the right place but didn't know what each part was called. I'm not stressing; at work research is one of my strong points.

    BEC - 79
    REG - 85
    AUD - 5/27/16

    #1584988
    oreoblast
    Participant

    @anyatver I Take my exam on Saturday and feel just really burned out. This is (hopefully) my last one. I don't know my scores for FAR or BEC yet. I have finished all the sections and taken the first mock exam (76). I plan on taking the second mock exam tomorrow after I finish going back through the information I needed to review. I honestly do not think I can touch the material again regardless of what I get on that second mock exam!!! I am worried about blaw as well as I do not have any previous experience with it.

    #1585000
    JB
    Participant

    Ninja MCQ 1307, Becker MCQ 02092
    Kent Corp. is a calendar-year, accrual-basis, C corporation. In the current year, Kent made a nonliquidating distribution of property with an adjusted basis of $150,000 and a fair market value of $200,000 to Reed, its sole shareholder. The following information pertains to Kent:
    Reed's basis in Kent stock at January 1 $500,000
    Accumulated earnings and profits at
    January 1 125,000
    Current earnings and profits, including
    the effects of this distribution 60,000

    What was taxable as dividend income to Reed for the current year?

    A.
    $60,000

    B.
    $150,000

    C.
    $185,000

    Incorrect D.
    $200,000

    Becker has $200,000 as the correct answer and Ninja has $185,000 as the correct answer.
    Ninja explanation:
    When a corporation makes a nonliquidating distribution of property to a sole shareholder, it is considered a dividend.

    Accumulated earnings and profits at January 1 $125,000
    Plus the current earnings and profits 60,000
    Total earnings and profits and maximum taxable dividend $185,000
    ========
    The taxable dividend income to Reed for the current year is $185,000, which is 100% of the earnings and profits of the corporation.

    Becker explanation:
    A dividend paid in property other than money is taxable to an individual taxpayer to the extent of the property's FMV, but not in excess of the current and the accumulated earnings and profits of the distributing corporation. In this case, the FMV of the dividend is $200,000. It is taxable to the extent that Kent had current earnings $60,000 plus accumulated earnings and profit $125,000 plus any gain generated on the distribution $50,000, thus the dividend is taxable to the extent of $200,000

    So, what is taxable as dividend income to Reed?

Viewing 15 replies - 451 through 465 (of 1,171 total)
  • The topic ‘REG Study Group July August 2017 - Page 31’ is closed to new replies.