- This topic has 1,445 replies, 157 voices, and was last updated 11 years, 4 months ago by
tacocatCPA.
-
CreatorTopic
-
May 14, 2014 at 3:33 pm #185551
jeffKeymasterFree Study Planner, Notes, Audio, Flashcards: https://www.another71.com/cpa-exam-study-plan/
Free CPA Exam Survival Guide: https://www.another71.com/cpa-exam-survival-guide/
-
AuthorReplies
-
August 22, 2014 at 4:05 pm #591949
spartan14MemberConfused on this one because I don't see how this fits into any of the categories of For AGI deductions…
Dale received $1,000 in the current year for jury duty. In exchange for regular compensation from her employer during the period of jury service, Dale was required to remit the entire $1,000 to her employer in this year. In Dale's current year income tax return, the $1,000 jury duty fee should be:
a. Deducted from gross income in arriving at adjusted gross income.
b. Claimed in full as an itemized deduction.
c. Claimed as an itemized deduction to the extent exceeding 2% of adjusted gross income.
d. Included in taxable income without a corresponding offset against other income.
Explanation
Choice “a” is correct. The $1,000 jury duty fee that was required to be remitted to the employer may be deducted from gross income in arriving at adjusted gross income. This, in effect, washes out the $1,000 income she will have to report as part of gross income for the jury duty fees paid to her.
AUD- 99 (5/29/14)
FAR- 92 (7/3/14)
REG- 93 (8/22/14)
BEC- 94 (10/11/14)August 22, 2014 at 4:25 pm #591950
How many letters do you needParticipantSpartan: Jury duty is one of the deductions to arrive at AGI. The logic is, you have jury duty pay already rolled into your gross income…but since you had to remit to your employer you can deduct it from your gross to arrive at AGI. Since some people don't remitt to employer it makes sense that it has to start as part of everybody's gross income and then those that didn't keep it get to deduct it to arrive at AGI.
MBA,CMA,CPA, CFF?, ABV?
August 22, 2014 at 4:31 pm #591951
spartan14MemberThat makes sense, thanks. I'm starting to see 4 and a half hours before my exam how much the Becker textbook decided to leave out.
AUD- 99 (5/29/14)
FAR- 92 (7/3/14)
REG- 93 (8/22/14)
BEC- 94 (10/11/14)August 22, 2014 at 4:43 pm #591952
How many letters do you needParticipantAugust 22, 2014 at 4:44 pm #591953
spartan14MemberFingers crossed, thank you!!
AUD- 99 (5/29/14)
FAR- 92 (7/3/14)
REG- 93 (8/22/14)
BEC- 94 (10/11/14)August 22, 2014 at 5:11 pm #591954
JamesBJamesParticipantGood luck, @spartan14!
I just finished my last REG lecture and my lest REG MCQ. Still got a couple of SIMs to do but, eh, whatever. It's finally over with.
I'm glad I saved R3 (corporations) and R4 (property, partnerships, trust, estate, gift) for last. Becker really crams a lot of stuff in there.
FAR: May 1st, 2014 - 91
AUD: May 29th, 2014 - 97!
BEC: July 16th, 2014 - 91
REG: August 29th, 2014 - 88Licensed December 2015
Feel free to add me on LinkedIn by clicking my username!
August 22, 2014 at 5:23 pm #591955
AnonymousInactiveQuestion about transfer of property to a corporation. If the corporation is not a controlled corporation, then the basis for the shareholder and for the corporation is FMV, with the shareholder basis reduced by any liability the corporation assumes, correct?
August 22, 2014 at 5:58 pm #591956
spartan14MemberThank you JamesBJames!
@adam I could definitely be wrong, but I thought that a corporation's basis is always the greater of NBV (plus gain recognized by shareholder) or debt assumed, except for when NBV exceeds FMV of property.
AUD- 99 (5/29/14)
FAR- 92 (7/3/14)
REG- 93 (8/22/14)
BEC- 94 (10/11/14)August 22, 2014 at 6:11 pm #591957
Jspann225MemberThere is one exception. If 1 person owns over 90% of the interest and a second person contributed property for the other 10% interest. The corporations basis for the second shareholder's contribution will be FMV.
FAR - 93 - 7/1/14
AUD - 94 - 7/25/14
REG - 92 - 8/30/14
BEC - 89 - 10/6/14August 22, 2014 at 7:24 pm #591958
TootsieMemberHi, REGGIES (yes, I just made that up for all REG test-takers)! So I finished the “Business Structures” lecture and questions. I actually remember some of it from college! Done reviewing chapters 1 through 3 and will start chapter 4 review tonight. I have 8 days left of studying…so glad I moved my exam date to 8/31. I am starting to get anxiety as exam day gets closer; I did a seating meditation yesterday, which helped some.
FAR - 76
AUD - 88!!! DONE!!!!!!!!
BEC - 76
REG - 77never, never, never give up
August 22, 2014 at 8:06 pm #591959
AnonymousInactive@spartan14 If it's a non controlled corporation then wouldn't the shareholder recognize gain of FMV-basis when contributing property? If that is the case, then wouldn't basis+gain be FMV? I'm not sure though.
August 22, 2014 at 8:23 pm #591960
Jspann225MemberI am facing extreme burnout. I am having a hard time reviewing some of the material. I can't go more than a few questions without wanting to get away from the computer. I think I need a day off.
FAR - 93 - 7/1/14
AUD - 94 - 7/25/14
REG - 92 - 8/30/14
BEC - 89 - 10/6/14August 22, 2014 at 8:36 pm #591961
How many letters do you needParticipantThat happened to me before FAR. Couldn't focus at all. It was already two days before the exam though so I just put the MCQs away and focused on notes. Being that we are only a week away I would suggest against taking a day off with nothing, it could make it hard to go full speed again the day after. I would suggest just take a day to re-write and/or review notes, listen to audio or that kind of thing. Sometimes the part of our brain that is in charge of logical reasoning just needs a break, but that doesn't mean you can't spend some time memorizing some of the more non-logic type of material (maybe business law or prof. Responsibilities)…
MBA,CMA,CPA, CFF?, ABV?
August 22, 2014 at 9:28 pm #591962
JamesBJamesParticipantI don't think taking a day off is all that bad, personally. Sometimes you really just need a break so you can recharge. I think taking two days off is when it starts to get detrimental. Whenever I did that, it was so hard to start back up again.
So, at the moment, I'm trying to decide how painful it would be to do all 1600+ of Becker's MCQs again in the week leading up to my exam, similar to what I did for AUD. Or, I could take the other route and just do tons of progress tests like I did for FAR and BEC. There's a ton of material in REG and not a lot of overlap between sections, and I'm not sure which the best option is.
What are the rest of you guys doing for review?
FAR: May 1st, 2014 - 91
AUD: May 29th, 2014 - 97!
BEC: July 16th, 2014 - 91
REG: August 29th, 2014 - 88Licensed December 2015
Feel free to add me on LinkedIn by clicking my username!
August 22, 2014 at 10:06 pm #591963 -
AuthorReplies
- The topic ‘[Q3] REG Study Group 2014 - Page 89’ is closed to new replies.
