[Q3] REG Study Group 2014 - Page 87

Viewing 15 replies - 1,291 through 1,305 (of 1,445 total)
  • Author
    Replies
  • #591917
    Tootsie
    Member

    @JMCAPASSO, my final review consists of reading the highlighted sections of the text, redoing all of the problems in Becker (including sims), reviewing my formula sheets and notes, doing progress tests and 2014 AICPA released questions, and finally, taking 2 practice tests. I am also going to print out the tax forms, review them, and practice filling them out. I still have to finish chapter 8 too…hoping to be done with it soon.

    FAR - 76
    AUD - 88!!! DONE!!!!!!!!
    BEC - 76
    REG - 77

    never, never, never give up

    #591918
    Qlad
    Member

    Can someone please explain the “Parole Evidence rule” …im not able to follow the language …what it means..thanks

    FAR 72,71,81 🙂
    AUD 64,71, 72, 75 🙂 I'm done !!!
    REG 73, 74, 74, 84 🙂
    BEC 76 🙂

    #591919
    jhawkins1010
    Member

    Qlad …You have a contract in writing and you end up going to court over it. Party B is arguing that an oral agreement made before or during the drafting the written contract differs from the terms of the written contract. The Parol Evidence Rule will stop Party B's argument. It prohibits a party from submitting evidence of an oral agreement that is in contradiction of the written contract.

    #591920
    Jspann225
    Member

    Ninja Reg multiple choice questions are so difficult. I don't know why I am surprised it was the same for FAR, but it really crushes confidence. lol

    FAR - 93 - 7/1/14
    AUD - 94 - 7/25/14
    REG - 92 - 8/30/14
    BEC - 89 - 10/6/14

    #591921
    kappa1032
    Participant

    just to add to the parole evidence rule, it doesn't apply to any agreements made after the contract is formed, so those are admissible in court

    FAR - 81
    REG - 74, 87
    AUD - 88
    BEC - 88

    Finally.

    “The only guarantee for failure is to stop trying”
    ― John C. Maxwell

    #591923
    JamesBJames
    Participant

    Almost done with REG. Just R4 to go!

    REG's starting to feel a lot like FAR, though. I'm doing fine on homework (low 80s) and progress tests (low 90s) but occasionally a question comes up that I know I looked at a month ago but can't remember now for the life of me. Sorry, Becker, I don't know how to calculate the child and dependent care credit anymore. You should just be glad I remember it exists. Oh, it's for qualified eligible expenses up to $3,000 for one dependent or $6,000 for two dependents and ranges between 20-35% depending on AGI and starts to phase out from 35% at $15,000 to 20% at $43,000 and is sometimes limited by the earned income of the spouse?

    No problem, I'll remember that.

    Can't wait until this is over.

    FAR: May 1st, 2014 - 91
    AUD: May 29th, 2014 - 97!
    BEC: July 16th, 2014 - 91
    REG: August 29th, 2014 - 88

    Licensed December 2015

    Feel free to add me on LinkedIn by clicking my username!

    #591924
    spartan14
    Member

    For computing a partner's basis in a partnership, I thought it was:

    Basis= Capital Account + Partner's Share of All Liabilities

    At risk= Capital Account + Partner's Share of Recourse Liabilities

    I'm getting confused now about whether the basis formula is right regarding all liabilities vs. recourse liabilities. anyone know?

    AUD- 99 (5/29/14)
    FAR- 92 (7/3/14)
    REG- 93 (8/22/14)
    BEC- 94 (10/11/14)

    #591925
    kappa1032
    Participant

    lol JamesBJames…i think we all feel that way. I really hope they don't don't us on those phaseout limits..

    FAR - 81
    REG - 74, 87
    AUD - 88
    BEC - 88

    Finally.

    “The only guarantee for failure is to stop trying”
    ― John C. Maxwell

    #591926
    jhawkins1010
    Member

    Starting REG simulations for my exam next Saturday. Starting to think I don't stand a chance …

    #591927
    jhawkins1010
    Member

    PROBLEM: Sold 1,225 shares of ABC Corp. stock at $9 per share. Green purchased 600 shares several years ago at $30 per share. Three years ago, when the stock price was $21, there was a 2-for-1 stock split, and two years ago, when the stock price was $25, there was a 3-for-2 stock split. No other shares were sold by Green prior to Year 2.

    SOLUTION: Green's total basis in the stock of $18,000 (600 shares × $30 per share) does not change. After the 2-for-1 and then the 3-for-2 stock split, Green owns 1,800 shares of stock, which makes the basis after the stock splits $10 per share. Green can recognize a loss of $1 per share ($9 sales price per share less $10 basis per share) or a total recognized loss of $1,225.

    Conceptually, I get it. What's throwing me off is where they 1,800 shares from. I only count 1,500. Start at 600, the 2-for-1 split gives you an additional 300, taking you to 900 shares. Then the 3-for-2 split gives you an additional 600 shares, taking you to 1,500.

    I'm assuming the 3-for-2 is where I'm messing up, but I'm not seeing how. 900 shares / 3 = 300 * 2 = 600

    #591928
    Jspann225
    Member

    I believe it is calculated

    600/1 = 600

    600 * 2 = 1200

    1200/2 = 600

    600 * 3 = 1800

    The first stock split is doubling your stock and the second stock split is increasing your stock by 50%

    FAR - 93 - 7/1/14
    AUD - 94 - 7/25/14
    REG - 92 - 8/30/14
    BEC - 89 - 10/6/14

    #591929
    JamesBJames
    Participant

    You're messing up the 2-for-1. It's 600 * 2/1 = 1200 for the first stock split * 3/2 = 1800 for the second stock split

    FAR: May 1st, 2014 - 91
    AUD: May 29th, 2014 - 97!
    BEC: July 16th, 2014 - 91
    REG: August 29th, 2014 - 88

    Licensed December 2015

    Feel free to add me on LinkedIn by clicking my username!

    #591930
    Yashy
    Participant

    Hey Everyone,

    I have a quick question for the ones who took FAR and REG. I start work on 10/6 (Tax – Corporate) and will have taken AUD and BEC (no idea if i passed or not). Do you think it would be smart just to study for FAR until the 10/18 exam or study for REG in between too and take REG before work? I am in Tax, so studying for REG during that may be easier or helpful after a 2 week training on “Tax Fundamentals – Corporate” in November. This is my schedule as of now:

    BEC Exam 8/31

    REG live Becker classes: Saturdays in September

    FAR and REG studying (9/6-10/4 nothing else except studying at a library)

    REG Exam 10/4

    Work begins 10/6

    FAR Exam 10/18

    Training on the 10/19

    Any insight would be very much appreciated.

    #591931
    Jsmith87
    Member

    @josh

    FAR and REG together would suck so bad. I have taken FAR and will take REG in about 9 days. They have so much information that I personally couldn't handle both in 4-6 weeks. AUD and BEC are less comprehensive than FAR and REG. Also, how many hours can you really study in one day? FAR required me to study about 130 hours. I will have studied about 150 hours for REG and I still don't feel good about it.

    #591932
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    81! Good luck to those testing soon! You can do it! Trust me 🙂

Viewing 15 replies - 1,291 through 1,305 (of 1,445 total)
  • The topic ‘[Q3] REG Study Group 2014 - Page 87’ is closed to new replies.