[Q3] REG Study Group 2014 - Page 82

Viewing 15 replies - 1,216 through 1,230 (of 1,445 total)
  • Author
    Replies
  • #591841
    Qlad
    Member

    got a question on warehouse receipts…I read somewhere in the book that warehouse receipts and bill of lading are not commercial paper, although they follow many similar rules….and here is a question where it says

    Under UCC, a warehouse receipt …

    Answer: is negotiable, if by it's terms, the goods are delivered to bearer or order of a named person…

    it's confusing me…any insights?

    FAR 72,71,81 🙂
    AUD 64,71, 72, 75 🙂 I'm done !!!
    REG 73, 74, 74, 84 🙂
    BEC 76 🙂

    #591842
    Jsmith87
    Member

    Can tax law get more complex? This Shit is killing me.

    #591843
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    I agree, tax law is the pits… just when I think I know something, there is more. Not sure why I left this for last!!

    #591844
    Jsmith87
    Member

    It is my last section too and I'm already burnt out. This is by far my weakest area. I don't even consider taxes accounting. Where are my debits and credits at!

    #591845
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    I hear ya, Jsmith… I'm ready to take my test Sunday and be done for now, until I find out I failed =/

    Question – sorry if this has been asked already – Is this question wrong? I would think the phase out of $250,000 would be applicable and there would be no Section 179 deduction. Am I missing something.

    Sally Markey, who owns a heavy construction company, decided to spend some of her $2,000,000 2014 profit on a heavy-duty diesel truck costing $811,000 for her business. In order to lower her income taxes for the year, she decided to take the maximum Section 179 deduction plus the MACRS depreciation for 7-year property. The ceiling for Section 179 in 2014 is $25,000. No other capital assets were purchased during 2014. What is the total deduction for the truck in 2014?

    Incorrect

    A. $25,000

    B. $137,319

    C. $112,319

    D. $405,500

    Correct Answer B: Sally Markey took the largest Section 179 deduction available in 2014, $25,000. This reduced the truck tax basis to $786,000 ($811,000 – $25,000). Depreciation available for the first year of MACRS is $112,319 ($786,000 × 0.1429). Total expense is $137,319 for the year ($25,000 + $112,319).

    #591846
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Just poked my head in tonight to see what the discussion is about after finishing my studies for the day… I started laughing at the recent comments about how much taxes are terrible, complex and no fun. It may be surprising to you guys, but this section has been one of the most enjoyable (of course partly because I am a tax accountant). Most of the information is good to know for doing your own taxes, and generally knowing the structure of how taxes work. If you think it is not fair that non tax accountants need to be tested on this stuff, think about the tax accountants that have to take audit. That is the section that I am going to dread.

    #591847
    Windel
    Participant

    I'm confused as to why this answer is “C”. Can anyone help clarify?

    n 2014, Amanda set up Coverdell education savings accounts for each of her four grandchildren, aged 7, 9, 14, and 16. She would like to contribute the annual maximum to each savings account when she usually makes other annual-election gifts every year on December 31. The annual maximum for 2014 is $2,000. How much can she contribute in total to the Coverdell education savings accounts in 2014 and each of the next four years?

    A.

    $2,000

    Incorrect B.

    $8,000

    C.

    $32,000

    D.

    $40,000

    The answer key states:

    Contributions to Coverdell education savings accounts must be made before the account beneficiaries are 18 years old. Therefore, only two years' contributions to the 16-year-old (age 16 and 17) qualify, and four years' contributions to the 14-year-old qualify (age 14, 15, 16, 17). Therefore, a total of $32,000 would be contributed over five years, as follows:

    7-year-old (5 x $2,000) = $10,000

    9-year-old (5 x $2,000) = $10,000

    14-year-old (4 x $2,000) = $ 8,000

    16-year-old (2 x $2,000) = $ 4,000


    $32,000

    =======

    #591848
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    @King Coffee

    Yikes, I honestly have no clue, certainly not good for someone who's about to take the exam.

    Well everyone, see you on the other side.

    #591849
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    @Qlad: I am not sure if i am understanding this right, by saying “add back”, it is a preference not an adjustment (??) So charitable contribution, home mortgage not used for home improvement, (1/2) of self-employment tax, traditional IRA, state income taxes could all be deduction in stead of adding back?

    I just hope there's some general rules to understand this add back/deduction thing instead of memorizing them one by one…

    #591850
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Krete, an unmarried taxpayer with income exclusively from wages, filed her initial income tax return for Year 8. By December 31, Year 8, Krete's employer had withheld $16,000 in federal income taxes and Krete had made no estimated tax payments. On April 15, Year 9, Krete timely filed an extension request to file her individual tax return and paid $300 of additional taxes. Krete's Year 8 income tax liability was $16,500 when she timely filed her return on April 30, Year 9, and paid the remaining income tax liability balance.

    What amount would be subject to the penalty for the underpayment of estimated taxes?

    a. $500

    b. $200

    c. $16,500

    d. $0

    The answer is D. Can someone please explain me Becker's explanation? I have no idea what it means:

    Choice “d” is correct. Provided the taxes due after withholdings were not over $1,000, there is no penalty for underpayment of estimated taxes. Note that there would be a failure to pay penalty on the $200 that was not paid until April 30, but this is a separate penalty.

    Choice “b” is incorrect. This $200 would be subject to a failure to pay penalty, but if the balance due after withholdings is not over $1,000, there is no penalty for underpayment of estimated taxes.

    Choice “a” is incorrect. If the balance of tax due after withholdings is not over $1,000, there is no penalty for underpayment of estimated taxes.

    Choice “c” is incorrect. The penalty for underpayment of estimated taxes is not assessed on the full amount of the income tax liability, only the unpaid amount after withholdings to the extent it exceeds $1,000.

    #591851

    It's saying that if the difference between your withholdings+estimated payments and your tax liability is less than 1000, there is no underpayment penalty. In this case the employer withheld 16,000, she made no estimated payments and the total tax liability was 16,500, so only 500 difference; < 1000 no penalty.

    The failure to pay penalty they are discussing is a penalty you owe for not paying taxes owed by Apr. 15th. Even if you file an extension you still have a penalty if you don't pay every penny owed by Apr. 15th. That's a different penalty all together though. ..

    MBA,CMA,CPA, CFF?, ABV?

    #591852

    Coffee: This one tripped me up a little bit too when I got it last week. The first thing to realize is that they are talking 5 years in aggregate (2014 and each of the next four years) and combined all 4 kids. The second is to realize that contributions can only happen through the age of 17. The problem states 2K max per kid. Here is how I go through it..

    Years left X 2K

    Ages 7-full five years = 10K

    Age 9-full five years = 10K

    Age 14 only gets four years (14-17) = 8K

    Age 16 only gets two years (16-17) = 4K

    Total = $32K.

    The good news is it's a really easy problem once you figure out the years for each child so start there….

    MBA,CMA,CPA, CFF?, ABV?

    #591853
    Qlad
    Member

    @coocooper…it means that though state taxes ,property taxes, personal exemption etc all are deducted to reach the taxable income…but these all needed to be added back to reach the AMT…only exception is that Charity and interest on home acquisition is both a deduction for regular tax income and for AMT…so we don't need to add them back…

    hope u were asking about the same thing…any thing I shud add, pls discuss guys…

    FAR 72,71,81 🙂
    AUD 64,71, 72, 75 🙂 I'm done !!!
    REG 73, 74, 74, 84 🙂
    BEC 76 🙂

    #591854
    Qlad
    Member

    @how many letters…thanks a lot for that explanation…whatever I did ,I cud not calculate the years properly…

    FAR 72,71,81 🙂
    AUD 64,71, 72, 75 🙂 I'm done !!!
    REG 73, 74, 74, 84 🙂
    BEC 76 🙂

    #591855

    Dsmith: I completely agree. We all have our strengths on the exam based on our background. Few if any of us are going to be strong in all four, and that's by design. I've had my easy passes at FAR & BEC and am suffering right now with REG. AUD will be somewhat better but still challenging I am sure. The goal is to prove that we can do anything (or learn how to do anything) within the entire scope of accounting. Nobody ever said it was going to be easy 🙂

    MBA,CMA,CPA, CFF?, ABV?

Viewing 15 replies - 1,216 through 1,230 (of 1,445 total)
  • The topic ‘[Q3] REG Study Group 2014 - Page 82’ is closed to new replies.