- This topic has 1,445 replies, 157 voices, and was last updated 11 years, 4 months ago by
tacocatCPA.
-
CreatorTopic
-
May 14, 2014 at 3:33 pm #185551
jeffKeymasterFree Study Planner, Notes, Audio, Flashcards: https://www.another71.com/cpa-exam-study-plan/
Free CPA Exam Survival Guide: https://www.another71.com/cpa-exam-survival-guide/
-
AuthorReplies
-
July 13, 2014 at 3:46 pm #591532
AnonymousInactive@cpacake, I know what you mean. Saturday will be my third attempt at REG & sixth test, if I don't pass (and if I do) I'm switching to FAR for an early October test and swing back to REG for a November test (AUD in Nov if I pass Saturday). It crushes your spirit & hope when you put in so many hours and something isn't clicking when you get to the exam.. Just have to keep trucking though!
July 13, 2014 at 4:43 pm #591533
AnonymousInactiveBetween last night and today I've done 40 of the 69 SIMS in Ninja. Averaging 73% on non-research SIMS and did fine on the research SIMS. I'm stuck on #7 because I don't know how they get $16,100 for casualty loss so if anyone does that one and understands it, please post an explanation on here. I'm not trying to be negative, but I have to question whether the real SIMS are going to be as simple as these. Most of the mistakes I made were dumb RTMFQ mistakes and not because they were hard. Others have said that Ninja SIMS are a good representation of the exam, but in just going over the individual tax ones I have my doubts. I really hope they are like these! Anybody else feel this way?
July 13, 2014 at 4:45 pm #591534
AmayMember@Melans I still work on short MCQ quizzes by topic up to test date.
BEC: 73, 81
AUD: 85
FAR: 71, 77
REG: 74, 75...finally DONE! 😀*This is my 2nd attempt at the CPA exam. For all of you who have failed this exam many times, given up on it, or taken a break like me, remember that it is still possible to finish what you started...failure is the opportunity to begin again more intelligently 🙂
July 13, 2014 at 4:56 pm #591535
AnonymousInactiveI am doing that too, but I am glad I did SIMS. It's nice to see some of that MCQ material actually applied. It would hurt my confidence to go into an exam without practicing any SIMS, but I know a lot of people that have passed without ever doing a SIM. I was making me nervous not to have practiced them, especially since I have never looked at a tax return, not to mention any of the additional schedules. It was good to see those and apply the information to them.
July 13, 2014 at 5:38 pm #591536
AmayMemberI know this is the one exam where I think I have to look at SIMS at least a little bit to not get blind sighted on test day. I have to make time for them before Thursday!
BEC: 73, 81
AUD: 85
FAR: 71, 77
REG: 74, 75...finally DONE! 😀*This is my 2nd attempt at the CPA exam. For all of you who have failed this exam many times, given up on it, or taken a break like me, remember that it is still possible to finish what you started...failure is the opportunity to begin again more intelligently 🙂
July 13, 2014 at 10:31 pm #591538
MelansMember@cpamommy-
Most of the mistakes I made were dumb RTMFQ mistakes and not because they were hard.
This made me chuckle!!! I must have said this a hundred times this week!
AUD 7/30/12 73; 12/2/13 85
BEC 7/19/13 81
REG 8/2/14 83
FAR - Jan 2015July 13, 2014 at 10:36 pm #591539
KimboroniMemberI definitely feel like practicing the SIMs for REG is helpful– it helps to make it more real world, and tax is all about real world. I think I do less MCQs than a lot of people, but I do all the SIMs, and I think I learn better that way since it requires a deeper level of processing to do them.
AUD 84 (1/9/14-Wiley books/TB + free materials)
FAR 83 (5/21/14-the above + NINJA 10 Pt Combo Lite)
REG 84 (7/9/14-Wiley books/TB + NINJA Audio/FC/Notes)
BEC 76 (10/5/14-Wiley books/TB + NINJA Audio/FC)Disclaimer: My ninja avatar is not meant to imply that I have any affiliation with this site other than being a forum member. That's a pic of a T-shirt that my daughter gave me for my birthday. 🙂
July 14, 2014 at 12:37 am #591540
AmayMemberCommercial paper question: Under the Negotiable Instruments Article of the U.C.C. (Article 3), which of the following instruments meets the negotiability requirement of being payable on demand or at a definite time?
A. A promissory note payable one year after a person's marriage
B. A promissory note payable June 30, Year 1, whose holder can extend the time of payment until the following June 30 if the holder wishes
C. A promissory note payable June 30, Year 1, whose maturity can be extended by the maker for a reasonable time
D. An undated promissory note payable one month after date
Answer: B
Explanation: According to Uniform Commercial Code (U.C.C.) Article 3, the payment is payable on demand or at a definite time. Therefore, June 30 would be considered a definite time because the payment due date can be determined from the instrument's face
Can someone explain the logic behind this??? Not sure why the answer cannot also be C seeing is at it has a definite time of June 30 as well. Thank you!
BEC: 73, 81
AUD: 85
FAR: 71, 77
REG: 74, 75...finally DONE! 😀*This is my 2nd attempt at the CPA exam. For all of you who have failed this exam many times, given up on it, or taken a break like me, remember that it is still possible to finish what you started...failure is the opportunity to begin again more intelligently 🙂
July 14, 2014 at 12:51 am #591541
NYCaccountantParticipantIt's B. because the holder can extend the payment until use 30th, which is set in stone, definite time. If they choose to extend, they have to pay on June 30th.
It's not C., because it states “reasonable” period of time, and this is not definite. it's open for interpretation. if they choose to extend, the exact day they have to pay is not known because of “reasonable”.
FAR - 93
REG - 87
BEC - 84!!!!
AUD - 99!!!!!! CPA exam complete.July 14, 2014 at 1:11 am #591542
AmayMemberThanks for your response NYC. That's what I thought as it was the only difference in the two options, but just wanted to clarify. Thanks for looking out! 🙂
BEC: 73, 81
AUD: 85
FAR: 71, 77
REG: 74, 75...finally DONE! 😀*This is my 2nd attempt at the CPA exam. For all of you who have failed this exam many times, given up on it, or taken a break like me, remember that it is still possible to finish what you started...failure is the opportunity to begin again more intelligently 🙂
July 14, 2014 at 1:56 am #591543
Jsmith87MemberHello everyone,
I'll start studying for REG this week and take the exam on 8/30/14. I'm not looking forward to the next 6 weeks. Just the thought of tax law makes me sick.
July 14, 2014 at 3:38 am #591544
AnonymousInactiveJuly 14, 2014 at 9:19 am #591545
LaComptableParticipantHi everyone,
I was a little confused by the below Becker question related to the Dividends Received Deduction and I'm hoping someone can help me figure out where my misunderstanding is. Based on the fact pattern in the below question I would have thought the DRD would have been $4,900 and not $7,000 since the it is supposed to be the lesser of 70% of the actual dividend or 70% of the taxable income without regard to DRD, NOL deduction, capital loss carryback, or domestic activities production. Yet based on the answer key, the DRD is $7,000. Why? What am I missing here??
Question details:
Kisco Corp.'s taxable income before taking the dividends received deduction was $70,000. This includes $10,000 in dividends from an unrelated taxable domestic corporation. Given the following tax rates, what would Kisco's income tax be before any credits?
Partial rate table
Tax rate
Up to $50,000
15%
Over $50,000 but not over $75,000
25%
a. $10,750
b. $12,500
c. $15,750
d. $10,000
Explanation
Choice “a” is correct. The $10,000 dividend is from an unrelated corporation. This means less than 20% of the company is owned. A 70% dividends received deduction is available.
Taxable income
$ 70,000
Less: Dividends received deduction (70% × 10,000)
(7,000)
Taxable income
$ 63,000
Income tax
15% × $50,000
$ 7,500
+ [25% × ($63,000 − $50,000)]
3,250
Total
$ 10,750
Choices “d”, “b”, and “c” are incorrect. The $10,000 dividend is from an unrelated corporation. [This means less than 20% of the company is owned. A 70% dividends received deduction is available.]
BEC - 88
AUD - 74, 87
REG - 77
FAR - 63, 82CIA certified in 2013
July 14, 2014 at 11:22 am #591546
Jsmith87Member@cpamommy
Thanks. Today I'll start studying REG. I've feared this day ever since I started the CPA exam process. Haha. I'm sure its not as bad as I imagine it to be.
July 14, 2014 at 3:01 pm #591547
How many letters do you needParticipantFor FAR and BEC I didn't touch Sims or WC examples, probably won't for AUD either. REG is a different story. I've never heard anybody take it and say “those Sims were a piece of cake!”. Almost everybody struggles with the REG Sims and that alone is good reason to brush up on them. Still have no intention of spending a ton of time on them but I think maybe two days in my final two weeks of review is about right…
MBA,CMA,CPA, CFF?, ABV?
-
AuthorReplies
- The topic ‘[Q3] REG Study Group 2014 - Page 62’ is closed to new replies.
