- This topic has 1,445 replies, 157 voices, and was last updated 11 years, 5 months ago by
tacocatCPA.
-
CreatorTopic
-
May 14, 2014 at 3:33 pm #185551
jeffKeymasterFree Study Planner, Notes, Audio, Flashcards: https://www.another71.com/cpa-exam-study-plan/
Free CPA Exam Survival Guide: https://www.another71.com/cpa-exam-survival-guide/
-
AuthorReplies
-
July 3, 2014 at 7:11 pm #591227
hollycontinuesMemberWell, I'm just back from the testing center. I'm cautiously optimistic for a score in the high 70s or at least passing. I felt pretty good about the MCQ thinking I'm headed towards about an 80 on that piece. The SIMS were a challenge. I had 3 I felt pretty good about (including the research question), 2 I felt okay about and one that 1 really don't know on. Hoping for 50% partial credit on that one. Anyway, now for the long, long wait for scores, but I'm switching away from carrying my backpack everyone to having a proper bag again not stuffed with CPA related stuff. Fingers crossed and good luck to all of you taking the exam in this window!
BEC - 86
FAR - 72, 74, 79
AUD - 73, 82
REG - 74, 81Whew! Just barely made it before BEC expired.
July 3, 2014 at 10:31 pm #591228
yassyMemberThis is long but can anyone help me out with this question?
I'm confused about why the answer is B-$15,000
Isn't the $25,000 deduction from ordinary income for passive loss from real estate rental activity reduced by 50% of AGI over $100,000? Here in the explanation it says the TOTAL passive rental loss is reduced by this amount.
I was thinking the deductible amount would be $5,000 ($25,000 less 50% of AGI over $100,000)
Lane, a single taxpayer, received $160,000 in salary, $15,000 in income from an S corporation in which Lane does not materially participate, and a $35,000 passive loss from a real estate rental activity in which Lane materially participated. Lane's modified adjusted gross income was $165,000. What amount of the real estate rental activity loss was deductible?
Incorrect
A. $0
B. $15,000
C. $25,000
D. $35,000
Individuals may offset up to $25,000 ($50,000 if married filing jointly) of ordinary income with rental real estate activities. This exemption is reduced (but not below zero) by 50% of the amount by which the adjusted gross income of the taxpayer for the year exceeds $100,000.
-First, the passive activities were netted $15,000 from the S corporation – $35,000 from the rental = $(20,000).
-Second, the salary of $160,000 is decreased by the net $20,000 passive activity loss for a modified AGI before limitation of $140,000.
-Third, the amount of $140,000 that exceeds $100,000 is multiplied by 50%, equaling $20,000.
-Fourth, the rental loss of $35,000 is decreased by the $20,000 limitation, leaving an allowable deduction of $15,000.
FAR 75 (8/21/13)
AUD 72 (10/29/13) 74 (2/12/14) 84! (04/01/14)
BEC 75 (11/27/13)
REG 72 (05/29/14) 74 (07/10/14) 86 and DONE! (10/02/14)July 4, 2014 at 3:49 am #591229
AnonymousInactive@hollycontinues Good luck! I wish you all the best!
July 4, 2014 at 6:11 am #591230
AmayMemberGood luck to everyone that has tested this week or is getting ready to take it soon!
And HAPPY 4TH!!
BEC: 73, 81
AUD: 85
FAR: 71, 77
REG: 74, 75...finally DONE! 😀*This is my 2nd attempt at the CPA exam. For all of you who have failed this exam many times, given up on it, or taken a break like me, remember that it is still possible to finish what you started...failure is the opportunity to begin again more intelligently 🙂
July 4, 2014 at 3:52 pm #591231
AnonymousInactive(repost from main page, and Happy 4th of July!)
-Education expenses are not deductible if: To meet minimum standards of a current job
.-Education expenses are deductible if: To meet the requirements of an employer or imposed by law to retain employment status.
What the heck? If you are going to meet the requirements by an employer or by law to retain employment status, aren't you meeting the minimum standards of a current job?
July 4, 2014 at 8:06 pm #591232
AnonymousInactiveJuly 4, 2014 at 8:54 pm #591233
KimboroniMemberYes, you should get the updated REG audio from him also. He didn't rerecord all of the sections. Chapter 1 was redone for sure. Most (maybe all) of b law is still the same.
I think the recent problems with Ninja MCQ were due to the update.
AUD 84 (1/9/14-Wiley books/TB + free materials)
FAR 83 (5/21/14-the above + NINJA 10 Pt Combo Lite)
REG 84 (7/9/14-Wiley books/TB + NINJA Audio/FC/Notes)
BEC 76 (10/5/14-Wiley books/TB + NINJA Audio/FC)Disclaimer: My ninja avatar is not meant to imply that I have any affiliation with this site other than being a forum member. That's a pic of a T-shirt that my daughter gave me for my birthday. 🙂
July 5, 2014 at 3:25 am #591234
Ima_Audit_YouMember@yassy I though that passive losses could only be deducted to the extent of passive gains and never a net loss
FAR 5/1 - 83
REG 7/7 - 79
AUD 11/20 - 85
BEC 8/27 - ALMOST THERE!!3 for 3! Study high, get high grades!!
July 5, 2014 at 10:48 am #591235
AnonymousInactiveHi REG studiers, I have a clarifying question regarding Employee Stock Purchase Plans (from Becker R1)
James Corp. issue stock options to employees under an Employee Stock Purchase Plan. Which of the following statements is correct?
I. The option exercise price must be less than the lesser of 95% of the FMV of the stock when granted or exercised.
II. The option cannot be exercised more than 27 months after the grant date.
a. Both.
b. I only.
c. II only.
d. Neither.
Explanation
Choice “c” is correct. I is not correct because the rule states 85%, not 95%. II is a correct statement. This is a requirement of an ESPP.
Choices “b”, “a”, and “d” are incorrect per the above explanation.
While I understand that is the answer, I'm confused by the explanation. It seems to indicate that the only change needed for I. to be correct is to change the 95% to 85%… But my Becker book says that the rule is actually: “The option exercise price MAY NOT [emphasis added] be less than the lesser of 85% of the FMV of the stock when granted or exercised.” Which seems to contradict with the “must” in the problem itself.
Would appreciate it if anyone can shed some light on this, as I might just be misreading the explanation, but it's kinda bugging me, since the two statements seem to be directly contradicting each other. ^^ Thank you!!
July 5, 2014 at 4:51 pm #591236
yassyMember@Ima_Audit_You oh yeah you're right! The explanation was really confusing me. Thank you 🙂
@DisneyDebits I think you're right about the two statements contradicting each other. The Becker book is the correct rule.
FAR 75 (8/21/13)
AUD 72 (10/29/13) 74 (2/12/14) 84! (04/01/14)
BEC 75 (11/27/13)
REG 72 (05/29/14) 74 (07/10/14) 86 and DONE! (10/02/14)July 5, 2014 at 5:33 pm #591237
Ima_Audit_YouMember@yassy Glad I was right haha I got so scared when I saw your explanation and started to question if I knew what the hell I was talking about!
FAR 5/1 - 83
REG 7/7 - 79
AUD 11/20 - 85
BEC 8/27 - ALMOST THERE!!3 for 3! Study high, get high grades!!
July 5, 2014 at 5:37 pm #591238
Ima_Audit_YouMemberAs far as tax items go do you all recommend learning the phase-out limits?
FAR 5/1 - 83
REG 7/7 - 79
AUD 11/20 - 85
BEC 8/27 - ALMOST THERE!!3 for 3! Study high, get high grades!!
July 5, 2014 at 8:06 pm #591239
AmayMemberNo, I am not planning on memorizing phase-out limits and it is not recommended.
BEC: 73, 81
AUD: 85
FAR: 71, 77
REG: 74, 75...finally DONE! 😀*This is my 2nd attempt at the CPA exam. For all of you who have failed this exam many times, given up on it, or taken a break like me, remember that it is still possible to finish what you started...failure is the opportunity to begin again more intelligently 🙂
July 5, 2014 at 8:52 pm #591240
AnonymousInactive@Ima_Audit_You from what I understand you should know what has phase-outs but that the exam should give you what the limits are in the problem.
July 5, 2014 at 8:58 pm #591241
Ima_Audit_YouMemberAwesome thanks guys!
Edit: What about AMT related items? So many seemingly odd adjustments/preferences
FAR 5/1 - 83
REG 7/7 - 79
AUD 11/20 - 85
BEC 8/27 - ALMOST THERE!!3 for 3! Study high, get high grades!!
-
AuthorReplies
- The topic ‘[Q3] REG Study Group 2014 - Page 42’ is closed to new replies.
