- This topic has 1,892 replies, 182 voices, and was last updated 12 years, 3 months ago by
jeff.
-
CreatorTopic
-
May 23, 2013 at 7:53 pm #177710
jeffKeymasterREG Resources:
Free REG Notes & Audio – https://www.another71.com/cpa-exam-study-plan
REG 10 Point Combo: https://www.another71.com/products-page/ten-point-combo
REG Score Release: https://www.another71.com/cpa-exam-scores-results-release
-
AuthorReplies
-
July 25, 2013 at 10:19 pm #439755
lmendez2MemberHello guys!! I just took one of the final exams on Becker and here are my grades! I finished within in two hours so tomorrow when I take the second exam I am going to take my time with the multiple choice questions since I did horrible on those!!
Testlet #1 – 79%
Testlet #2 – 79%
Testlet #3 – 75%
SIM #1 Medical Deductions100%
SIm #2 Casualty Losses 80%
SIM #3 Tax Treatment 80%
SIM #4 Tax Treatment 100%
SIM #5 Research 0%
SIM #6 Tax Issues 100%
The research question was killing me and even when they gave me the answer I did not understand how that is the good answer! LOL!
FAR 5/29/13 75
REG 7/27/13 84
BEC 08/31/13 84
AUD 11/02/13 89July 25, 2013 at 10:19 pm #439889
lmendez2MemberHello guys!! I just took one of the final exams on Becker and here are my grades! I finished within in two hours so tomorrow when I take the second exam I am going to take my time with the multiple choice questions since I did horrible on those!!
Testlet #1 – 79%
Testlet #2 – 79%
Testlet #3 – 75%
SIM #1 Medical Deductions100%
SIm #2 Casualty Losses 80%
SIM #3 Tax Treatment 80%
SIM #4 Tax Treatment 100%
SIM #5 Research 0%
SIM #6 Tax Issues 100%
The research question was killing me and even when they gave me the answer I did not understand how that is the good answer! LOL!
FAR 5/29/13 75
REG 7/27/13 84
BEC 08/31/13 84
AUD 11/02/13 89July 26, 2013 at 3:19 am #439757
AnonymousInactivegood try, but did u clock?
July 26, 2013 at 3:19 am #439891
AnonymousInactivegood try, but did u clock?
July 26, 2013 at 3:20 am #439759
AnonymousInactive@Awesome new rule?
July 26, 2013 at 3:20 am #439893
AnonymousInactive@Awesome new rule?
July 26, 2013 at 3:29 am #439761
AnonymousInactive@2013_CPA
both payor and beneficiary are employee, it is nontaxable to employee;
business entity may never take deduction for life insurance on key employees with entity beneficiary; but an IRC Sec telling that life insurance policy received upon key employee's death is tax free.
i guess u r mentioning book income <=> taxable income conversion.
life insurance paid for key employees with entity beneficiary is never deductible, hence it is added to book income to reach taxable income (or taken out from taxable income to reach book income-this process is also the process of converting taxable income to current E & P). notice, any increase in cash surrender value in policy must be reduced from the payment amount.
also, life insurance policy being distributed to entity upon keey employee's death is tax free, hence it is taken out from book income to reach taxable income. notice, any cash surrender value in distribution must be reduced from the distribution.
conversion may be tested much in partnership, corporation (schedule M-1, M-3 and CEP).
July 26, 2013 at 3:29 am #439895
AnonymousInactive@2013_CPA
both payor and beneficiary are employee, it is nontaxable to employee;
business entity may never take deduction for life insurance on key employees with entity beneficiary; but an IRC Sec telling that life insurance policy received upon key employee's death is tax free.
i guess u r mentioning book income <=> taxable income conversion.
life insurance paid for key employees with entity beneficiary is never deductible, hence it is added to book income to reach taxable income (or taken out from taxable income to reach book income-this process is also the process of converting taxable income to current E & P). notice, any increase in cash surrender value in policy must be reduced from the payment amount.
also, life insurance policy being distributed to entity upon keey employee's death is tax free, hence it is taken out from book income to reach taxable income. notice, any cash surrender value in distribution must be reduced from the distribution.
conversion may be tested much in partnership, corporation (schedule M-1, M-3 and CEP).
July 26, 2013 at 4:27 am #439763
MrsBingMemberI am so glad I only have one chapter lecture left. I cannot stand listening to Olinto. Everytime I hear him swallow his spit I want to slap him.
Becker, Wiley Test Bank, and Ninja 10 Point Combo!
FAR: 89
REG: 87
AUD: 92
BEC: 75
Ethics: 90Licensed Arizona CPA
July 26, 2013 at 4:27 am #439897
MrsBingMemberI am so glad I only have one chapter lecture left. I cannot stand listening to Olinto. Everytime I hear him swallow his spit I want to slap him.
Becker, Wiley Test Bank, and Ninja 10 Point Combo!
FAR: 89
REG: 87
AUD: 92
BEC: 75
Ethics: 90Licensed Arizona CPA
July 26, 2013 at 4:34 am #439765
lmendez2Member@cycgundam I did the test in two hours I always panic during the MCQs and try to hurry to I have enough time for the simulations I am allowing myself half hour per testlet MAX and 1.5 for the simulations since I usually get lost and dont understand what they are asking me but the becker simulations were not bad at all.
When I was taking FAR I started the simulations with 1.5 hours and I had such a hard time with them that I guessed on the last one and entered my last number with seconds left on the clock.
@ Awesome where did you see that new rule? I only notice that they changed the description for accredited investors…. are you talking about Dodd Frank Act? it now says that accredited individuals are the ones with a net worth of over a 4-year period that averages more than $1 million excluding value of residence when before it used to be at least one million in net worth OR $200,000 in annual income
FAR 5/29/13 75
REG 7/27/13 84
BEC 08/31/13 84
AUD 11/02/13 89July 26, 2013 at 4:34 am #439899
lmendez2Member@cycgundam I did the test in two hours I always panic during the MCQs and try to hurry to I have enough time for the simulations I am allowing myself half hour per testlet MAX and 1.5 for the simulations since I usually get lost and dont understand what they are asking me but the becker simulations were not bad at all.
When I was taking FAR I started the simulations with 1.5 hours and I had such a hard time with them that I guessed on the last one and entered my last number with seconds left on the clock.
@ Awesome where did you see that new rule? I only notice that they changed the description for accredited investors…. are you talking about Dodd Frank Act? it now says that accredited individuals are the ones with a net worth of over a 4-year period that averages more than $1 million excluding value of residence when before it used to be at least one million in net worth OR $200,000 in annual income
FAR 5/29/13 75
REG 7/27/13 84
BEC 08/31/13 84
AUD 11/02/13 89July 26, 2013 at 4:36 am #439767
lmendez2MemberHahahaha I feel your pain MrsBing!!! My husband even said that he is supporting me on this process so I don't dump him after I get my CPA license (as a joke of course!!) since Peter is always saying that if your significant other is not supporting you to drop them since you will upgrade anyways once you get your license hahaha!
FAR 5/29/13 75
REG 7/27/13 84
BEC 08/31/13 84
AUD 11/02/13 89July 26, 2013 at 4:36 am #439901
lmendez2MemberHahahaha I feel your pain MrsBing!!! My husband even said that he is supporting me on this process so I don't dump him after I get my CPA license (as a joke of course!!) since Peter is always saying that if your significant other is not supporting you to drop them since you will upgrade anyways once you get your license hahaha!
FAR 5/29/13 75
REG 7/27/13 84
BEC 08/31/13 84
AUD 11/02/13 89July 26, 2013 at 5:20 am #439769 -
AuthorReplies
- The topic ‘REG Study Group July August 2013 - Page 77’ is closed to new replies.
