- This topic has 391 replies, 102 voices, and was last updated 11 years, 9 months ago by Soon2BCPA127.
-
CreatorTopic
-
November 29, 2012 at 12:57 am #174995jeffKeymaster
Resources:
Free Study Planner + REG NINJA Notes (Individual Tax): https://www.another71.com/cpa-exam-study-plan/
REG Exam Experience: https://www.another71.com/cpa-exam-forum/topic/reg-exam-experience-official-thread
-
AuthorReplies
-
January 23, 2013 at 6:42 pm #401147TheoMember
@Soon2BCPA127 This will be my first time and my second CPA exam. I just sat for AUD 1/17.
AUD 01/17/2013 (92)
REG 02/28/2013 (85)
FAR 04/26/2013 (85)
BEC 05/30/2013 (88)January 23, 2013 at 8:20 pm #401148RukusParticipantapple32 is correct in regards to C corp distributions. Soon2BCPA you need to make sure you know the difference between C corp and S corp distributions.
Ex: C corp distributes 50,000 to a shareholder with a basis of 30,000. The C corp has current E&P of 10,000 and accumulated E&P of 15,000. Here is how the distribution is treated:
25,000 (10,000 current E&P + 15,000 accumulated E&P) is a taxable dividend to the shareholder
25,000 is a return of capital and is nontaxable to shareholder but reduces their basis to 5,000 (30,000-25,000)
If all else is the same but the distribution was 60,000 then this would be the case:
25,000 taxable dividend
30,000 nontaxable return on capital
5,000 capital gain, and basis would be 0, not negative
If an S corp the distributions are nontaxable (shareholder already paid tax on the income of the S corp in the year earned), so if you take the first example and change it to an S corp it would look like this:
30,000 nontaxable distribution
20,000 capital gain, basis is now 0
Hope this helps clarify.
FAR - 81 (8/31/12)
AUD - 93 (10/19/12)
BEC - 79 (11/27/12)
REG - 92 (2/8/13) DONE! All 1st attempt!January 23, 2013 at 9:43 pm #401149lsutigers03ParticipantI'm also taking REG on Feb 28th. It'll be my first time. How did you do on the Becker multiple choice your first time through? For R1 which is all I've done so far my scores were between 68% and 75% which I though wasn't very good but talking with people in my class most were lower than that on their first try with the multiple choice.
REG - 78
BEC - 74, 67, 69, 69, 70, 79
FAR - 76
AUD - 69, 69, 69, 74, 85Licensed Louisiana CPA
“You never fail until you stop trying.”
― Albert EinsteinJanuary 24, 2013 at 4:08 am #401150someaccountantParticipantVent time!
I just did some SIMS from Wiley for Corporate Tax and these things were beastly. When it seemed that the actual answer was pretty obvious, there was always some obscure exception that wasn't clearly stated in the question. I hope that I do not get screwed in the actual exam because they don't provide enough details in the question.
I scored 84% in the M/C and 49% on the few sims I did. That is crap.
FAR - 84!
REG - 76!
AUD - 80!
BEC - August 2013January 24, 2013 at 4:02 pm #401151Soon2BCPA127Member@Rukus and @apple32
I forgot to look to at the becker book yesterday but it def did say distributions to shareholder is generally a nontaxable event. But i do understand that dividends in general are taxable. I was reading the text (something new I'm trying this round) and i think that's what created my confusion. But thank you for the explanation! I tried doing R3 questions – I'm doing horrible.
January 24, 2013 at 4:53 pm #401152Soon2BCPA127Member@lsutigers03 and @Theo – This is my second time taking REG exam. I'm on R3 right now but doing horrible with quesitons. The concept sticks to my head but i find it hard to apply it when it comes to answering questions.
Also – last year i took in class becker courses – where the instructor said for the 1st time u do homework it's ok to score around 60s but for ur final review and final exam you should be scoring around 90s to be ready for the exam.
I've only used Becker – one disadvantage is that because you repeat the same questions – you already know the answer by the time you're redoing them for the 3rd time. I have heard alot about Wiley questions – i may buy the bank to prep me even more.
January 24, 2013 at 8:16 pm #401153RukusParticipantSoon2BCPA127, I would highly recommend the Wiley test bank in your situation. I have used it for the first 3 parts so far, and have had great results. I was consistently scoring in the 80s for each 30 MCQ study session the last 3-4 days leading up to my exams and that performance pretty much transferred to the actual exam. Brand new questions would really help you narrow down the topics you are strong/weak on and allow you to tailor your focus to those weak areas during your final review.
FAR - 81 (8/31/12)
AUD - 93 (10/19/12)
BEC - 79 (11/27/12)
REG - 92 (2/8/13) DONE! All 1st attempt!January 25, 2013 at 3:47 am #401154AnonymousInactiveI finished the R4 lecture today and my new highlighter is already out of ink. I guess I'll pick up a box of highlighters next time!!!
January 25, 2013 at 5:38 am #401155Nevergiveup2012MemberCan somebody explain the logic behind the basis of new property in a like-kind exchange when boot is received or paid?
So the formula for the new basis is adjusted basis on property given up + gain recognized – boot received + boot paid?
I memorized the formula but I don't understand the logic why would the boot received reduces the basis ? In financial accounting, any boot received would only increase the total cost basis.
BEC - 86 (8/31/12)
AUD - 97 (11/18/12)
REG - 83 (5/12/13)
FAR - 91 (12/2/13)
Done!!!January 25, 2013 at 2:54 pm #401156xcowgirl19xMemberHi all! I took REG on 1/14/13 and I didn't finish all my SIMs, I ran out of time on the last two!! UGH I got a 74 on REG last time but I am pretty sure I did not pass this time =(
Anyone ever pass while running out of time on the SIMs?
I do NOT want to take REG a 3rd time but I feel like I am going to have to.
GOOD LUCK TO EVERYONE WHO HAS YET TO TAKE AN EXAM THIS WINDOW!
BEC (78)
REG (74) Retake in 1/14/13
FARE (78)
AUD. (88)January 25, 2013 at 6:50 pm #401157TheoMemberThe tax basis of the new property should basically be the same as in the old but where boot is involved that basis may change. In a like-kind exchange the taxpayer is able to defer the taxes until the item is sold or otherwise. This is why no gain is recognized if there is no boot involved. Where an exchange involves boot, then the boot received reduces the gain recognized and any boot paid, sometimes to zero, leaving the basis of the new property the same as that in the old property because the gain recognized will never exceed the boot received. Any increase in the tax basis will represent excess put that the taxpayer paid out.
Hope this helps a little 🙂
AUD 01/17/2013 (92)
REG 02/28/2013 (85)
FAR 04/26/2013 (85)
BEC 05/30/2013 (88)January 25, 2013 at 7:37 pm #401158TheoMemberFor those who have already taken REG before and use Becker materials, are the sims as long as the becker sims? I just started doing R1 sims and they are incredibly boring (too long).
AUD 01/17/2013 (92)
REG 02/28/2013 (85)
FAR 04/26/2013 (85)
BEC 05/30/2013 (88)January 26, 2013 at 7:35 am #401159m1kalParticipantR3 and R4 are SO HARD! how do you all study for it?
REG - 76
BEC - 76
AUD - 93
FAR - 71, 68,69, 70, retake 7/19/16January 26, 2013 at 2:37 pm #401160Soon2BCPA127Member@apple32 and @ Rukus – here's a questoin from becker questions that confused me:
Brisk Corp. is an accrual-basis, calender-year C corporation with one individual shareholder. At year end, Brisk had $600,000 accumulated and current earnings and profits as it prepared to make its only dividend distribution for the year to its shareholder. Brisk could distribute either cash of $200,000 or land with an adjusted tax basis of $75,000 and a fair market value of $200,000. How would the taxable income of both Brisk and the shareholder change if land were distributed instead of cash?
A. Brisk's taxable income = No Change | Shareholder's taxable income = No Change
B. Brisk's taxable income = Increase | Shareholder's taxable income = No Change
C. Brisk's taxable income = No Change | Shareholder's taxable income = Decrease
D. Brisk's taxable income = Increase | Shareholder's taxable income = Decrease
I thought the answer could be A since cash dividends are taxable and land is also taxable so either way $200k worth of cash or property will be taxed. However, the correct answer is B. It says the general rule is that the payment of a dividend does not create a taxable event, unless the distribution is appreciated property. When the distribution is of appreciated property, the corporation recognizes gain as if the property were sold at FMV.
I do not understand how dividends will not be a taxable event? Do you guys see my confusion?
January 26, 2013 at 3:16 pm #401161eyeontheprizeMemberDoes anyone know how up-to-date the exam is? Regarding Sec 179 rules, my 2012 material still states the $139,000 max Sec 179…but after the new law changes occurred in 2012, didn't this get changed to the $500k expense again? I'm just trying to figure out what the right answer is in case I get asked a question on this during my exam.
-
AuthorReplies
- The topic ‘REG Study Group January/February 2013 - Page 19’ is closed to new replies.