REG Study Group April May 2017 - Page 21

  • Creator
    Topic
  • #1509588
    jeff
    Keymaster

    Welcome to the Q2 2017 CPA Exam Study Group for REG. 🙂

Viewing 15 replies - 301 through 315 (of 356 total)
  • Author
    Replies
  • #1559026
    Holly
    Participant

    I think I hate these videos!

    BEC - 79
    REG - 85
    AUD - 5/27/16

    #1559029
    Holly
    Participant

    @thaik I think starting July, 2017 is tested

    BEC - 79
    REG - 85
    AUD - 5/27/16

    #1559080
    sharpy
    Participant

    I took REG yesterday and it was painful. The new sims are ridiculous, be prepared everyone! I passed my practice exams and was doing really well on the NINJA Sims and felt unprepared for the new shape of the sims this go around. Hopefully, I knew the concepts well enough to apply them correctly, now on to BEC… @thaik 2016 is tested for this window.

    Change of pace...CMA here I come

    #1559095
    Kaitlin2424
    Participant

    All,

    Are the Becker Sims a total wash? I'm testing next week and considering purchasing Gleim.

    Thanks! This forum really helps me feel like i'm “not alone” haha.

    #1559139
    Rq7778
    Participant

    Can anyone clarify if property taxes are included in the basis of land purchased or exhanged? My belief is that they are not , but I can't seem to find it in my book now.

    I know that sales tax is included in the basis of equipment, trucks, etc. that are purchased, but my question is about property tax.

    Thanks,

    Bekah

    #1559206
    Teal
    Participant

    FAR (66,68) Aug 26
    REG (66) July 25
    AUD (66) December 1st
    BEC - October 3rd

    #1559305
    TXJAM
    Participant

    I feel i've gotten questions regarding prospectus wrong.

    After the 20 day waiting period Prospectus must be given before the purchase. Is what i have on my notes, but i swear the answer was “before or after purchase” as long as the purchaser received the prospectus.

    Which is right?

    #1559332
    Rq7778
    Participant

    For those who have taken the test this quarter and used Gleim as well as Becker, should I purchase Gleim for $250 to supplement for TBS?

    This will be my third time taking the test (lol). I passed once with an 84 (straight out of college, had a great tax professor, and barely had to study), failed this past March with a 73, and I am retaking this May 27. I am absolutely determined to not fail again.

    That being said, is it worth $250 for the extra TBS practice? I am currently studying with Becker and Ninja test bank questions. If I did buy it, do you think I will benefit seeing as I'm only a few days out? Any insight is appreciated.

    #1559334
    Rq7778
    Participant

    @Kaitlin2424 I'm considering purchasing as well. Let me know what you find out!

    #1559538
    mimi
    Participant

    Could someone help me understand this MCQ?

    Danielson invested $2 million in DEC, a qualified small business corporation. Six years later, Danielson sold all of the DEC stock for $16 million and purchased an office building with the proceeds. Danielson had not previously excluded any gain on the sale of small business stock. What is Danielson's taxable gain after the exclusion?
    A. $0
    B. $6 million
    C. $7 million
    D. $9 million

    C is correct. I thought 100% gain is excludable so thought A was correct.
    Following is the answer explanation.. I could not get why a gain exclusion is only 50%, not 100%. Is this 50% limit rule really there?

    IRC Section 1202 permits a taxpayer, other than a corporation, to exclude in general 50% of the gain realized on the sale of a qualified small business corporation if the taxpayer holds the stock for more than five years prior to sale. The amount of gain which may be excluded in this manner is limited, on a “per issuer” basis, to the greater of $10 million or 10 times the taxpayer's basis in the stock.
    In this example, 50% of the gain is $7 million ($16,000,000 − $2,000,000 × 0.50). Compare that number to:
    1. 10 times the taxpayer's basis, which would be $20 million ($2,000,000 × 10)
    2. $10 million
    The gain excluded is limited to the greater of either (1) or (2) above—in this case, $20 million. However, since the gain exclusion is calculated at $7 million, the limitation is not met and $7 million is excluded.

    Thank you!

    #1559602
    Holly
    Participant

    Proceeds – $16m
    Basis –

      <2m>

    Gain = $14m * 50% = $7m Section 1202 reduces the gain to 50%, limited by the two given in the explanation.

    BEC - 79
    REG - 85
    AUD - 5/27/16

    #1559652
    mimi
    Participant

    Hi Holly, thank you for your prompt comment!

    I guess this question is missing when the stock was acquired? I found following table from this website –
    https://www.groco.com/readingroom/sec1202_gain.aspx

    Section 1202 Stock Capital Gain Exclusion
    Acquired 8/11/1993 – 2/17/2009 50%
    Acquired 2/18/2009 – 9/27/2010 75%
    Acquired after 9/27/2010 100%

    According to this table and website, the MCQ's timing of acquisition of the stock assumes 8/11/1993 – 2/17/2009 so that the 50% Gain exclusion applies?

    #1559764
    ajm317
    Participant

    Took REG earlier. MCQ were comparable to Ninja & Wiley. I got through them with 2 Hours and 10 minutes to go. I got 4 DRS sims. Lot of reading & material to go through here. Don't spend too much time skimming through the AL or you'll find yourself short on time on testlet 5 as I did. I would recommend doing the AICPA practice exam online. SIMS on exam are similar, just longer. Good luck to all

    #1559794
    Holly
    Participant

    @mimi Your question specifically states that it's a small business corporation. The explanation given in the article you attached explains how non-corporate investors can exclude gain at the given percentages. These are called qualified entities that are granted QSBS rules.

    BEC - 79
    REG - 85
    AUD - 5/27/16

    #1559860
    wng1885
    Participant

    If the fmv of an equipment and the boot received in an exchange is less than the basis of the equipment that was given up, what would be the basis of the new? If it is a realized loss, do you still recognize a gain equal to the boot received?

Viewing 15 replies - 301 through 315 (of 356 total)
  • The topic ‘REG Study Group April May 2017 - Page 21’ is closed to new replies.