REG – Exam Prep - Page 116

Viewing 15 replies - 1,726 through 1,740 (of 1,971 total)
  • Author
    Replies
  • #372565
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    @nolifecpa—-Good job! I looked at these over and over and then did a few more examples and it did make a little bit of sense. The way you worded it is better. A few more examples I saw was 59400 organizational costs were incurred and a company started operations July 1st 2011. I noticed a key item–when amounts are over 50k you don't have to worry about subtracting out the 5000……..you can just go 59400 * (6/180) = 1980 since, like you said the $5000 can't be used if it is phased out over 50k which in this case it is. How about this one 15,000 of organizational costs for a company that started operations march 1st 2011. I'd do this 15000-5000(since you can take that 5000. Then 10000 * (10/180) = 555.55 +5000 = 5555 deduction. Hope this helps everyone who was struggling because this can be a nightmare the way they word it. I”m also assuming the startup costs are reduced dollar for dollar over 60k?

    #372566
    nolifecpa
    Participant

    @BARF_is_the_word

    you got the hang of it now!

    5,555 deduction is correct, also dollar for dollar rule applies to 60K as well

    REG-65,71,74,73,70,74,79
    BEC-60's,60's,69,71,76*,78
    FAR-67,66,65,79
    AUD-54,60's,65,83*,69,80
    *expired

    DONE

    #372567
    sharpy
    Participant

    Time to start studying for REG again. I took AUD on 5/11 and feel pretty good, Ive passed it before, so it shouldn't be a problem. Next on the agenda is REG aka the beast I haven't passed yet. I'm losing credit on BEC in august but there is no way I will attempt to take REG and FAR in the same window. I passed FAR back in Nov 2009 back when this all began…amazing how you can go from 3 passed to 1. Any tips on passing REG for a tax hater?

    Change of pace...CMA here I come

    #372568

    Exam on Tuesday…EEEEK! Right now I am typing notes and doing Sims.

    For those of you who have passed with Becker, did you find it more beneficial doing MCQ or practicing the Sims? Though I know the Sims never really represent the REAL Sims, I am practicing them figuring that they encompass material from several MCQ's and will really test my knowledge rather than ability to guess at an answer.

    So what do you think? Spend the time on MCQ's and progress tests or the SIMS?

    B 71 - 79 EXPIRED
    A 69 - 75 EXPIRED
    R 65 - 48 - 45
    F 56 - 61 - 65 - 64

    Becker, Wiley Test Bank, Wiley Text and Ninja Notes

    "The fish who keeps on swimming is the first to chill upstream" -311

    Experience - Done, like WAAAY done.
    Still need 30 more credits, in basket weaving (gotta love new CA requirements)

    #372569
    sharpy
    Participant

    @HustlinHustlin I agree with you that the sims are never the same and rarely similar on the actual exam. For the tests that I have passed with Becker, I practiced only a few simulations, but mostly the MCs are the way to go and I usually do quite a few progress tests. Good Luck!!

    Change of pace...CMA here I come

    #372570
    smac88
    Member

    Have my exam on friday and have been going crazy trying to figure out the max deduction and phase out for the 179 expense deduction for depreciation. Does anyone know for sure what the amount is for 2012. I am very confused. Thank you.

    FAR- 80 (11/29/11)
    BEC- 78 (1/5/12)
    AUD- 90 (2/22/12)
    REG-

    #372571
    smac88
    Member

    Also how in depth do we need to know tax credits? Becker does not provide many examples and the wiley text book has so may different credits. Do we need to know them all along with phaseouts and limits?

    FAR- 80 (11/29/11)
    BEC- 78 (1/5/12)
    AUD- 90 (2/22/12)
    REG-

    #372572
    Texas27
    Member

    For 2012 the Sec. 179 max deduction is $125,000 and phase -out starts when qualifying assets are above $500,000 and are dollar per dollar decreases in the maximum amount over $500,000.

    For credits, I think we need to know most of them. However, the phase out limits are not that important from what I have heard. Also, know which ones are refundable and which ones are nonrefundable, maximum amounts, and how to qualify for them.

    BEC - Feb 2012: 80
    AUD - Feb 2012: 84
    FAR - Apr 2012: 78
    REG - May 2012: 90

    Thanks Becker!

    #372573
    smac88
    Member

    @texas27 Thanks alot for the help!

    FAR- 80 (11/29/11)
    BEC- 78 (1/5/12)
    AUD- 90 (2/22/12)
    REG-

    #372574

    The following question is from the Wiley test bank:

    For the year ended December 31, 2011, Marshall Corporation reported book income, before federal income taxes, of $200,000. The following items were included in the determination of income before federal income taxes.

    Provision for state corporate income tax $15,000

    Interest earned on United States obligation 20,000

    Net long-term capital loss from the sale of marketable securities 10,000

    Interest paid on loan to purchase United States obligations 12,000

    Marshall’s taxable income on its 2011 federal income tax return would be

    • $193,000

    • $192,000

    • $225,000

    • $210,000

    Wiley says the correct answer is 210,000 and they give the following explanation-

    The only reconciling item is the NLTCL of $10,000 which was deducted per books, but is not deductible in computing taxable income. Taxable income is $200,000 + $10,000 = $210,000.

    However I think this is wrong because I am pretty sure that interest earned on U.S. obligations is not includible in taxable income and therefore would have to be subtracted out to reach taxable income. (looked it up in Becker book to confirm-R3-6 and it seems that Wiley is wrong!) Also I thought that interest paid for U.S obligations is not deductible and therefore would have to be added back to calculate taxable income.

    Am i missing something here? Help please!!

    Thanks another71 community in advance and for just being there through this process!

    #372575
    mgnyc
    Participant

    @TheFashionista,

    I believe Interest earned on US obligations such as T-Bills is included in Taxable income, but interest earned on State/Municipal bonds is not.

    Aud 73, 79
    Reg 70, 60, 67, 76
    Far 70, 66, 72, 87
    Bec 77

    #372576

    Hi All,

    So, i'm planning on studying for regulation and I wanted to get some advice on how to go about studying. I currently have the Wiley Regulations book for 2010, is that book good enough? I skimmed the chapter and attempted a few problems in the 1st chapter. In my opinion, the material is very dry and wordy. I'm not even sure how much I got out of skimming the chapter. Any advice on how to attack the material and study for reg, would be great?! Thanks.

    #372577

    @TheFashionista $mgnyc Yes. US Treasury income is taxable. State & Muni Bonds and US EE Savings Bonds are tax-free.

    R: pass F: B: A:

    #372578

    @letmepassalready88 I would just get the 2012 Wiley REG book. You should study the most update to date material for tax/law.

    R: pass F: B: A:

    #372579

    giantsrangers,

    What materials did you use? Is it better to use Becker or Wiley/Yaeger?

Viewing 15 replies - 1,726 through 1,740 (of 1,971 total)
  • The topic ‘REG – Exam Prep - Page 116’ is closed to new replies.