[Amay]

I have Becker and now NINJA MCQs, which I was planning on using for my review phase. Based on experience, do you recommend I do MCQs with Becker or just jump straight to the NINJA? It’s my last exam and I am afraid to change it up.

What worked on my FAR retake was using Becker as main review course and I supplemented with WTB., which I used to review at the end (starting with my weakest topics – already identified with Becker).

What do you guys think? Should I try both again (like I did with FAR) or just go for it with NINJA seeing as I am really short on time here?

BEC: 73, 81
AUD: 85
FAR: 71, 77
REG: 74, 75...finally DONE! 😀

*This is my 2nd attempt at the CPA exam. For all of you who have failed this exam many times, given up on it, or taken a break like me, remember that it is still possible to finish what you started...failure is the opportunity to begin again more intelligently 🙂

[GSU-CPA]

I am not sure ill be much of help here but i have been studying for reg and i have been first taking wiley MCQ's and then Ninja MCQ's.

I find that ninja mcq's are harder and i have read on the forums that they are much better.

Most people on the forums are saying GREAT things about ninja MCQ's so i would say just do ninja ones. I have read number of people post that ninja mcq's made the difference between them passing and failing.

REG-77
BEC -Waiting on score May 5th
AUD - May 30
FAR - Q3 depending on if i pass above two in Q2

[Amay]

Thanks @GSU. I am also leaning into just doing NINJA, that way I don't have to manually track my weak areas, which is what I have to do with Becker.

BEC: 73, 81
AUD: 85
FAR: 71, 77
REG: 74, 75...finally DONE! 😀

*This is my 2nd attempt at the CPA exam. For all of you who have failed this exam many times, given up on it, or taken a break like me, remember that it is still possible to finish what you started...failure is the opportunity to begin again more intelligently 🙂

[Author]

Replies