Confused by this simple question

  • Creator
    Topic
  • #197585
    Zyx
    Participant

    Lee repairs high-speed looms for Sew Corp., a clothing manufacturer. Which of the following circumstances best indicates that Lee is an employee of Sew and not an independent contractor?

    A.Lee’s work is not supervised by Sew personnel.

    B.Lee’s tools are owned by Lee.

    C.Lee is paid weekly by Sew.

    D.Lee’s work requires a high degree of technical skill.

    The answer is C.

    I understand that answer A and B is clearly incorrect and D is silly answer. But why getting paid weekly is considered an employ???

    My company pays many contractors weekly. Can anyone help to explain this please?

    REG: 77 x2
    BEC: 81 x3
    FAR: 68 retake 10/1
    AUD: 8/27

  • The topic ‘Confused by this simple question’ is closed to new replies.