- This topic has 1 reply, 2 voices, and was last updated 8 years, 8 months ago by .
-
Topic
-
Here is the question:
A former client of Aaron Derek, CPA, filed a lawsuit in state court alleging that Aaron failed to exercise due care in the performance of tax and compilation services performed in 2011. Aaron firmly believes that he performed his services with competence and diligence. In his defense, he plans to admit to making one minor error which he says was inadvertent and did not have a material effect on the client’s taxes or financial position. In light of his admission, has Aaron complied with the AICPA Code’s standard of due care and why?
A. No. He obviously did not discharge his professional responsibilities with competence and diligence.
B. No. He did not perform professional services to the best of his abilities.
C. Yes. He has chosen to be honest in reporting that he made an error.
D. Yes. The AICPA standard for due care does not require CPAs to be infallible.
This one is tricky. Okay so I fell it is D, but it throws in does not require. I know we are not infallible. Then C it says he did be honest. What does it matter if a CPA is honest about making a mistake? I don’t think changes any thing. So I think D is correct. I’m having trouble with the word infallible-incapable of making mistakes.
So does D mean due care does not require CPA to be incapable of making mistakes? The wording is hard for me to understand. We can make mistakes.
- The topic ‘Comprehensive Course Review’ is closed to new replies.