- This topic has 428 replies, 101 voices, and was last updated 6 years, 10 months ago by spandey27.
-
CreatorTopic
-
December 11, 2017 at 10:58 am #1676693jeffKeymaster
Welcome to the Q1 2018 CPA Exam Study Group for REG. 🙂
Introduce yourselves and let your fellow NINJAs know when you plan to take your exam.
The Five Steps (NINJA Framework): https://www.another71.com/pass-the-cpa-exam/
-
AuthorReplies
-
December 19, 2017 at 8:46 pm #1682692SturgParticipant
Anyone know best way to get research questions in for REG? I'm having trouble finding the IRC website in a form similar to how it will look on the exam so I can search for terms, etc..
December 19, 2017 at 8:54 pm #1682704CanPassAttitudeParticipant@Sturg It is tough to find the documentation identical to what is on the exam, specifically the research question. Honestly, it is all about what specific words/terms you search and knowing what broad section to look in. Using the “specific word(s) search” is key.
December 19, 2017 at 9:39 pm #1682756LentilcounterParticipantI passed FAR on this most recent attempt doing these things:
1. I did all the MCQ in Ninja, typed out notes for everything I got wrong, and learned why it was wrong
2. doing all the SIMs in Becker
3. spent the last two weeks before the exam doing practice sets of 66 random Ninja MCQ a day and reviewing SIMs in Becker
that correlated with the AICPA exam blueprints (review is key with FAR because of all the material)
4. answering any question about FAR on this Another71 forum
5. lots of prayerA lot of people are saying that it is possible to pass REG without really going crazy on BLAW and Ethics. When I look at the AICPA blueprints, I don't see how you could get a BLAW simulation. There is also a thread posted on this forum today of people who passed REG in Q4 without touching BLAW. Therefore, I think it is wise to focus on the tax stuff and master it. Get a high level understanding of the BLAW and ethics. Also, pickup the tax forms and look at.
Post your questions on here about REG and we will work through them together. I am here to learn too. So, maybe we can teach each other.
BEC = 72 (6/08/16)
FAR = ?
REG = ?
AUD = ?December 20, 2017 at 12:10 am #1682888hopingtogetFARParticipantHi!
I'm really hoping I connect with this study group. I had a great study group for FAR, and I'm sure that's why I passed the first go round. I failed REG by one point, and I am starting an internship in January, so I'm hoping to take it before February. I think with a good study group I can pass within the next few weeks. Good luck to everyone.
December 20, 2017 at 1:08 am #1682918TiredofCoffeeParticipantQuestion-partnership taxation
When property contributed has a liability that exceeds basis – capital gain makes partners basis zero. I understand…but why does IRS website the below?
Read 2nd sentence, says gain included in partner's basis. Is it talking about same thing here?
From IRS Publication 541:
“Basis of Partner's Interest”(p9)
The basis of a partnership interest is the money plus the adjusted basis of any property the partner contributed. If the partner must recognize gain as a result of the contribution, this gain is included in the basis of his or her interest. Any increase in a partner's individual liabilities because of an assumption of partnership liabilities is considered a contribution of money to the partnership by the partner.
December 20, 2017 at 6:28 am #1682977gguzmanParticipantI highly recommend not putting off BLAW as much as you are thinking you can. I am planning on having a much stronger understanding this time around by doing a lot more MCQ's. Last time I tried to fine tune the tax and ignored this area too much, and I think that's what crushed me.
December 20, 2017 at 10:34 am #1683181nshah1824ParticipantFor those who have taken the REG exam, what would be your best advice study wise? I started to study but had a question specifically pertaining to the phase outs? Should I know all the phase outs or just know that there is a phase out in such a situation like Coverdell IRA's?
December 20, 2017 at 11:27 am #1683247wecandoit – CPA 2018ParticipantI am also taking REG at the end of February.
Let's do this!!!!Be merciful my Lord!
BEC - PASSED, Thank you LORD!
AUD - PASSED, LORD! you are able!
REG - 06/10/2016 - I can do all things through Christ who gives me strength!
FAR - 08/21/2016You only fail when you stop TRYING!!
This will be the year!!
All the glory to you, LORDDecember 20, 2017 at 12:04 pm #1683284SturgParticipant@Lentilcounter, nice work with FAR! 84 not easy. I followed a similar study plan as you (not as many MC) and got an 80 so I'm hoping to apply that same plan to REG. I learned a ton from this forum so it's good to see familiar names.
@nshah1824, Roger videos say not to worry about phase-out numbers only that they have phase-outs but I have a feeling they could still test for it.December 20, 2017 at 2:39 pm #1683511CPAIn2018Participant@lentilcounter,
Thank you for answering my earlier question on page 1 of this forum.
In the answer, 25 minus 6 which is 19k has been considered as boot. My way of understanding, boot should be cash or cancellation of debt. The 25k is list price of the truck on exchange, but not boot. Am I right?
December 20, 2017 at 5:12 pm #1683715LentilcounterParticipant@CPAIn2018
Correct. $25K is the sales price of the new truck.
boot paid = $25K sales price of the truck – $4K adjusted basis of old truck = $19K
BEC = 72 (6/08/16)
FAR = ?
REG = ?
AUD = ?December 20, 2017 at 5:30 pm #1683724LentilcounterParticipantI copied the information straight out of the IRS publication 541 below.
@tiredofcoffee
The basis of a partnership interest is the money
plus the adjusted basis of any property the partner
contributed. If the partner must recognize
gain as a result of the contribution, this gain is
included in the basis of his or her interest. Any
increase in a partner's individual liabilities because
of an assumption of partnership liabilities
is considered a contribution of money to the
partnership by the partner.I think the gain in your question based on the paragraph above is different. When the partnership assumes liabilities from the partner in the property transferred greater than the adjusted basis of the property, the partner's interest basis goes to $0 and anything above that becomes a capital gain to the partner. However, this capital gain is not included in the partner's basis to increase it. See the examples below.
What is the gain above referring to that increases the partner's basis as a result of a contribution? I'm still trying to figure that out.
Example 1. Ivan acquired a 20% interest in
a partnership by contributing property that had
an adjusted basis to him of $8,000 and a
$4,000 mortgage. The partnership assumed
payment of the mortgage. The basis of Ivan's
interest is:Adjusted basis of contributed property……
$8,000
Minus: Part of mortgage assumed by other partners (80% × $4,000)
3,200
Basis of Ivan's partnership interest……..
$4,800Example 2. If, in Example 1, the contributed property had a $12,000 mortgage, the basis of Ivan's partnership interest would be zero. The $1,600 difference between the mortgage assumed by the other partners, $9,600 (80% × $12,000), and his basis of $8,000 would be treated as capital gain from the sale or exchange of a partnership interest. However, this gain wouldn't increase the basis of his partnership interest.
BEC = 72 (6/08/16)
FAR = ?
REG = ?
AUD = ?December 20, 2017 at 5:35 pm #1683727LentilcounterParticipant@STURG Thanks. 80 is a solid score too!
“Anyone know best way to get research questions in for REG? I'm having trouble finding the IRC website in a form similar to how it will look on the exam so I can search for terms, etc..”
What are using to study? I don't know about NINJA but Becker and GLEIM give you research functionality in the IRC identical to the exam (from what others have said on this forum). I am also using both currently. I find the IRC easier to search than the authoritative literature for FAR or AUD, but it takes a little practice. Once you understand the layout, it becomes easier.
BEC = 72 (6/08/16)
FAR = ?
REG = ?
AUD = ?December 20, 2017 at 7:51 pm #1683848SturgParticipantThanks Lentil, here's to crushing REG!!
December 20, 2017 at 9:44 pm #1683931TiredofCoffeeParticipant@LentilCounter
Thanks! I think Pub 541 has some clarifying to do on gains in a partner's basis. If anything they need to change the word to “partnership”. Think I will send an email. Ha, ha, just joking. Guess we all make mistakes!
-
AuthorReplies
- The topic ‘REG Study Group – Q1 2018 - Page 3’ is closed to new replies.