REG Study Group – Q1 2018 - Page 20

  • Creator
    Topic
  • #1676693
    jeff
    Keymaster

    Welcome to the Q1 2018 CPA Exam Study Group for REG. 🙂

    Introduce yourselves and let your fellow NINJAs know when you plan to take your exam.

    The Five Steps (NINJA Framework): https://www.another71.com/pass-the-cpa-exam/

Viewing 15 replies - 286 through 300 (of 428 total)
  • Author
    Replies
  • #1694234
    Katie
    Participant

    @dj, I familiarized myself to a certain extent then used the “Search within” feature. I was able to find most of the things I was looking for within a few minutes. Interpreting it correctly in a timely manner is a different story 😉

    #1694260
    Lentilcounter
    Participant

    “Analyze the impact of the charitable contribution and/or dividends received deductions on the net operating loss calculation of a C corporation.”

    This is one of the “analysis” topics so I want to make sure I understand this correctly.

    The dividends received deduction (DRD) equals the lessor of 70% or 80% of dividends received (depending on ownership % of the investor in the investee)

    OR

    70% or 80% of taxable income computed without regard to the DRD, NOL, capital loss carryback, charitable contributions, etc.

    *The one exception is if the DRD creates or adds to corp. NOL, then the DRD is not limited to % of taxable income.

    So this is what I understand in plain English with an example below.

    Let's say that my taxable income before any of that stuff mentioned above is $150K including $100K of dividends received from an investee in which I have 80% ownership.

    1. Calculate the DRD deduction based on ownership % on the dividends received and on the taxable income.
    80% of $100K = $80K and 80% of $150K = $120K

    2. Take the lessor of the calculation result for #1 and subtract it from taxable income.
    $150K – $80K = $70K

    However, let's suppose my taxable income was only $70K including $100K of dividends received from an investee in which I have 80% ownership.

    80% of $100K dividends received = $80K and 80% of $70K taxable income = $49K

    $70K – $80K = -$10K

    Bottom line = take the lessor of DRD%*dividends received OR DRD%*taxable income UNLESS taking the full DRD deduction on the dividends would CREATE OR INCREASE NOL.

    Does this all sound right to you guys?

    BEC = 72 (6/08/16)
    FAR = ?
    REG = ?
    AUD = ?

    #1694261
    Reema
    Participant

    Simulation 25

    Can anyone please explain why the loss on sale of shares is 3800 in case of T Corp instead of 1900.

    Sandy is requesting that you, as one of the staff accountants, handle her tax material for the current year.

    Sandy had various stock transactions that qualified as capital gains. The information for these transactions is given in the table below. Complete the table by putting the proper amounts in the shaded cells for gains and losses. If the value of a cell is zero, you must enter a zero (“0”) to receive credit for your answer. Use dollar amounts only (i.e., no cents). In the final column, click on the cell and select “ST” from the drop-down menu if the transaction is short term or “LT” if the transaction is long term.

    Sandy James' Capital Transactions
    Common Stock Date Acquired Cost Date Sold Sales Price Gain Loss ST or LT
    200 shares of L Corp. 2/1/Yr. 4 $21,000 3/17/Yr. 5 $15,000 0 $6,000 LT
    300 shares of R Corp. 4/18/Yr. 4 4,000 4/18/Yr. 5 9,000 $5,000 0 ST
    100 shares of T Corp. 5/20/Yr. 1 7,800 7/22/Yr. 5 4,000 0 $1,900 LT
    50 shares of T Corp. 8/15/Yr. 5 4,900

    #1694273
    Lentilcounter
    Participant

    Sandy James' Capital Transactions
    Common Stock Date Acquired Cost Date Sold Sales Price Gain Loss ST or LT
    200 shares of L Corp. 2/1/Yr. 4 $21,000 3/17/Yr. 5 $15,000 0 $6,000 LT
    300 shares of R Corp. 4/18/Yr. 4 4,000 4/18/Yr. 5 9,000 $5,000 0 ST
    100 shares of T Corp. 5/20/Yr. 1 7,800 7/22/Yr. 5 4,000 0 $1,900 LT
    50 shares of T Corp. 8/15/Yr. 5 4,900

    If I am following your logic, you are saying that the original loss of $4,000-$7,800 = -$3,800 should be reduced by the amount of the disallowed loss as a result of the 08/15/year 5 purchase of 50 shares of T corp?

    $-3,800+(($78/share-$40/share))*50 shares repurchased within 30 days)
    $-3,800+$1,900= – $1,900

    I'm not sure either but will keep looking. I am wondering too why the 50 shares of T corp. repurchase isn't reducing the initial loss on sale of shares from 7/22/year 5.

    Is this from Roger or Ninja?

    BEC = 72 (6/08/16)
    FAR = ?
    REG = ?
    AUD = ?

    #1694278
    Recked
    Participant

    @Lentil
    I was also reviewing the DRD because of the blueprints this morning and found this little article that helps.
    I briefly reviewed your example and I think you are correct.
    This has a little more info as well.
    https://macabacus.com/taxes/dividends-received-deduction

    In case the link does not post, google macabacus drd nol

    #1694290
    scattershot
    Participant

    close, except in the first example 80% ownership would give you a total deduction

    my understanding of it:

    < 20%           70%
     20 <= x < 80    80%
     >= 80           100%
    #1694341
    dj
    Participant

    @katie

    thank you! yeah I think I will try to familiarize myself to an extent (the IRC). The IRC just seems so much larger than the AL on FAR or AUD for the SIMS.



    @reckedracing

    That article on DRD was very informative. Thank you for sharing!

    #1694351
    Lentilcounter
    Participant

    @recked

    Thanks!

    What do you think this means “Compare the tax implications of liquidating distributions from different business entities”.

    Is that talking about distributions with regards to the C corp, S corp, and partnerships?

    For example, with C corp —> current E&P, accumulated E&P, reduce stock basis and return of capital, capital gain, etc.?

    BEC = 72 (6/08/16)
    FAR = ?
    REG = ?
    AUD = ?

    #1694455
    Reema
    Participant

    @ Lentil- it is from Ninja.

    #1694458
    Reema
    Participant

    Which convention will be used in the following case:-

    If for example, I purchase an asset in Feb worth $ 10,000. and also in Dec worth 40,000.

    I will apply mid quarter convention for 40,000 . But should I apply mid year convention or mid quarter convention for 10,000 worth asset purchased in Feb?

    #1694482
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    From my own experience, you definitely don't need to memorize Circular 230 at all to pass REG. You'd be better served purchasing the shorter study guides from any of the big studying material providers, and after having used NINJA myself as my sole material for REG I never saw the reason to pay more money for material I may not be comfortable trusting to enable me to pull of a pass.

    And as a PS, I used NINJA materials exclusively for most of BEC as well as all of REG and AUG and thought I'd try a change of pace with FAR because that exam haunts me today as I'm sure certain others have had the same experience with their difficult sections. Using the FAR NINA notes and MCQs I was able to pass my final far exam, for which I am eternally grateful.

    If you have questions or are interested in learning more, just let know and I'll be glad to help!

    #1694485
    scattershot
    Participant

    @Reema Mid-quarter for the Feb asset as well. If you look at the MACRS tables for mid quarter there's 4 different ones, one for each quarter.

    #1694560
    Sne58
    Participant

    Hi Guys,

    Posting here for the first time. I have REG exam on Jan 19th. Did anyone take their exam in January if yes how was the experience. I havesStudied backer (Full book except Charter 8 last 2 module + Ninja MCQ at around 30% to 40%). I am mixing up rules for C corp, S corp and Partnership specially for liquidating and non-liquidating distribution. I hope i can get it right on exam.

    FAR – 78

    BEC – 75

    REG – Jan 19, 2018

    AUD – May 2018

    #1694646
    Reema
    Participant

    @ scattershot- Thanks a lot.

    I have one more question. Sim 32 of Ninja

    Line 33: Keisha paid interest on her student loan in the amount of $1,500. The deductibility of student loan interest is limited to $2,500; the limit on modified AGI for Head of Household is $80,000. Since Keisha’s AGI is well above the $80,000 limit, she cannot deduct any of the $1,500 of student loan interest.

    Line 34: As is the case on line 33, Keisha’s AGI is well above the $80,000 limit and therefore she cannot deduct any amount of tuition and fees on this line.

    From the above explanation, I could see that Interest on loan is deductible up to 2500 and there is a limit mentioned of $ 80,000. I don't recollect any such limits mentioned in Roger review course. Is it expected to remember these limits?

    #1694706
    Reema
    Participant

    @ Recked and Lentil- how was your exam?

Viewing 15 replies - 286 through 300 (of 428 total)
  • The topic ‘REG Study Group – Q1 2018 - Page 20’ is closed to new replies.