- This topic has 428 replies, 101 voices, and was last updated 6 years, 11 months ago by
spandey27.
-
CreatorTopic
-
December 11, 2017 at 10:58 am #1676693
jeff
KeymasterWelcome to the Q1 2018 CPA Exam Study Group for REG. 🙂
Introduce yourselves and let your fellow NINJAs know when you plan to take your exam.
The Five Steps (NINJA Framework): https://www.another71.com/pass-the-cpa-exam/
-
AuthorReplies
-
January 17, 2018 at 12:25 pm #1694234
Katie
Participant@dj, I familiarized myself to a certain extent then used the “Search within” feature. I was able to find most of the things I was looking for within a few minutes. Interpreting it correctly in a timely manner is a different story 😉
January 17, 2018 at 1:13 pm #1694260Lentilcounter
Participant“Analyze the impact of the charitable contribution and/or dividends received deductions on the net operating loss calculation of a C corporation.”
This is one of the “analysis” topics so I want to make sure I understand this correctly.
The dividends received deduction (DRD) equals the lessor of 70% or 80% of dividends received (depending on ownership % of the investor in the investee)
OR
70% or 80% of taxable income computed without regard to the DRD, NOL, capital loss carryback, charitable contributions, etc.
*The one exception is if the DRD creates or adds to corp. NOL, then the DRD is not limited to % of taxable income.
So this is what I understand in plain English with an example below.
Let's say that my taxable income before any of that stuff mentioned above is $150K including $100K of dividends received from an investee in which I have 80% ownership.
1. Calculate the DRD deduction based on ownership % on the dividends received and on the taxable income.
80% of $100K = $80K and 80% of $150K = $120K2. Take the lessor of the calculation result for #1 and subtract it from taxable income.
$150K – $80K = $70KHowever, let's suppose my taxable income was only $70K including $100K of dividends received from an investee in which I have 80% ownership.
80% of $100K dividends received = $80K and 80% of $70K taxable income = $49K
$70K – $80K = -$10K
Bottom line = take the lessor of DRD%*dividends received OR DRD%*taxable income UNLESS taking the full DRD deduction on the dividends would CREATE OR INCREASE NOL.
Does this all sound right to you guys?
BEC = 72 (6/08/16)
FAR = ?
REG = ?
AUD = ?January 17, 2018 at 1:20 pm #1694261Reema
ParticipantSimulation 25
Can anyone please explain why the loss on sale of shares is 3800 in case of T Corp instead of 1900.
Sandy is requesting that you, as one of the staff accountants, handle her tax material for the current year.
Sandy had various stock transactions that qualified as capital gains. The information for these transactions is given in the table below. Complete the table by putting the proper amounts in the shaded cells for gains and losses. If the value of a cell is zero, you must enter a zero (“0”) to receive credit for your answer. Use dollar amounts only (i.e., no cents). In the final column, click on the cell and select “ST” from the drop-down menu if the transaction is short term or “LT” if the transaction is long term.
Sandy James' Capital Transactions
Common Stock Date Acquired Cost Date Sold Sales Price Gain Loss ST or LT
200 shares of L Corp. 2/1/Yr. 4 $21,000 3/17/Yr. 5 $15,000 0 $6,000 LT
300 shares of R Corp. 4/18/Yr. 4 4,000 4/18/Yr. 5 9,000 $5,000 0 ST
100 shares of T Corp. 5/20/Yr. 1 7,800 7/22/Yr. 5 4,000 0 $1,900 LT
50 shares of T Corp. 8/15/Yr. 5 4,900January 17, 2018 at 1:58 pm #1694273Lentilcounter
ParticipantSandy James' Capital Transactions
Common Stock Date Acquired Cost Date Sold Sales Price Gain Loss ST or LT
200 shares of L Corp. 2/1/Yr. 4 $21,000 3/17/Yr. 5 $15,000 0 $6,000 LT
300 shares of R Corp. 4/18/Yr. 4 4,000 4/18/Yr. 5 9,000 $5,000 0 ST
100 shares of T Corp. 5/20/Yr. 1 7,800 7/22/Yr. 5 4,000 0 $1,900 LT
50 shares of T Corp. 8/15/Yr. 5 4,900If I am following your logic, you are saying that the original loss of $4,000-$7,800 = -$3,800 should be reduced by the amount of the disallowed loss as a result of the 08/15/year 5 purchase of 50 shares of T corp?
$-3,800+(($78/share-$40/share))*50 shares repurchased within 30 days)
$-3,800+$1,900= – $1,900I'm not sure either but will keep looking. I am wondering too why the 50 shares of T corp. repurchase isn't reducing the initial loss on sale of shares from 7/22/year 5.
BEC = 72 (6/08/16)
FAR = ?
REG = ?
AUD = ?January 17, 2018 at 2:27 pm #1694278Recked
Participant@Lentil
I was also reviewing the DRD because of the blueprints this morning and found this little article that helps.
I briefly reviewed your example and I think you are correct.
This has a little more info as well.
https://macabacus.com/taxes/dividends-received-deductionIn case the link does not post, google macabacus drd nol
January 17, 2018 at 2:56 pm #1694290scattershot
Participantclose, except in the first example 80% ownership would give you a total deduction
my understanding of it:
< 20% 70% 20 <= x < 80 80% >= 80 100%
January 17, 2018 at 4:59 pm #1694341dj
Participantthank you! yeah I think I will try to familiarize myself to an extent (the IRC). The IRC just seems so much larger than the AL on FAR or AUD for the SIMS.
That article on DRD was very informative. Thank you for sharing!
January 17, 2018 at 5:08 pm #1694351Lentilcounter
Participant@recked
Thanks!
What do you think this means “Compare the tax implications of liquidating distributions from different business entities”.
Is that talking about distributions with regards to the C corp, S corp, and partnerships?
For example, with C corp —> current E&P, accumulated E&P, reduce stock basis and return of capital, capital gain, etc.?
BEC = 72 (6/08/16)
FAR = ?
REG = ?
AUD = ?January 17, 2018 at 10:23 pm #1694455January 17, 2018 at 10:31 pm #1694458Reema
ParticipantWhich convention will be used in the following case:-
If for example, I purchase an asset in Feb worth $ 10,000. and also in Dec worth 40,000.
I will apply mid quarter convention for 40,000 . But should I apply mid year convention or mid quarter convention for 10,000 worth asset purchased in Feb?
January 18, 2018 at 1:10 am #1694482Anonymous
InactiveFrom my own experience, you definitely don't need to memorize Circular 230 at all to pass REG. You'd be better served purchasing the shorter study guides from any of the big studying material providers, and after having used NINJA myself as my sole material for REG I never saw the reason to pay more money for material I may not be comfortable trusting to enable me to pull of a pass.
And as a PS, I used NINJA materials exclusively for most of BEC as well as all of REG and AUG and thought I'd try a change of pace with FAR because that exam haunts me today as I'm sure certain others have had the same experience with their difficult sections. Using the FAR NINA notes and MCQs I was able to pass my final far exam, for which I am eternally grateful.
If you have questions or are interested in learning more, just let know and I'll be glad to help!
January 18, 2018 at 1:19 am #1694485scattershot
Participant@Reema Mid-quarter for the Feb asset as well. If you look at the MACRS tables for mid quarter there's 4 different ones, one for each quarter.
January 18, 2018 at 10:03 am #1694560Sne58
ParticipantHi Guys,
Posting here for the first time. I have REG exam on Jan 19th. Did anyone take their exam in January if yes how was the experience. I havesStudied backer (Full book except Charter 8 last 2 module + Ninja MCQ at around 30% to 40%). I am mixing up rules for C corp, S corp and Partnership specially for liquidating and non-liquidating distribution. I hope i can get it right on exam.
FAR – 78
BEC – 75
REG – Jan 19, 2018
AUD – May 2018
January 18, 2018 at 2:34 pm #1694646Reema
Participant@ scattershot- Thanks a lot.
I have one more question. Sim 32 of Ninja
Line 33: Keisha paid interest on her student loan in the amount of $1,500. The deductibility of student loan interest is limited to $2,500; the limit on modified AGI for Head of Household is $80,000. Since Keisha’s AGI is well above the $80,000 limit, she cannot deduct any of the $1,500 of student loan interest.
Line 34: As is the case on line 33, Keisha’s AGI is well above the $80,000 limit and therefore she cannot deduct any amount of tuition and fees on this line.
From the above explanation, I could see that Interest on loan is deductible up to 2500 and there is a limit mentioned of $ 80,000. I don't recollect any such limits mentioned in Roger review course. Is it expected to remember these limits?
January 18, 2018 at 5:39 pm #1694706Reema
Participant@ Recked and Lentil- how was your exam?
-
AuthorReplies
- The topic ‘REG Study Group – Q1 2018 - Page 20’ is closed to new replies.