- This topic has 428 replies, 101 voices, and was last updated 6 years, 11 months ago by
spandey27.
-
CreatorTopic
-
December 11, 2017 at 10:58 am #1676693
jeff
KeymasterWelcome to the Q1 2018 CPA Exam Study Group for REG. 🙂
Introduce yourselves and let your fellow NINJAs know when you plan to take your exam.
The Five Steps (NINJA Framework): https://www.another71.com/pass-the-cpa-exam/
-
AuthorReplies
-
January 12, 2018 at 10:52 am #1692278
Recked
ParticipantYes Katie, that is how I am reading it as well.
Remember the corporation is a separate entity, so most transactions between corp and shareholder should appear as “arms length” and FMV.
The partnership is an “extension of the partner”, and is allowed the basis transfer on assets in and out. P'ships are still separate entities, just different rules.
There are specific rules surrounding each, so you need to be sure to know all the rules.Dependents claimed under a parent. Their tax depends on their amount of income, specifically unearned income. If over a certain threshold there is a kiddie tax involved where they are taxed at the parents rate. If its just a kid with a W2 for 2 or 3 grand, they file as a dependent of another. They don't claim themselves and pay at the lowest rate, and usually get any Fed W/H refunded to them.
January 12, 2018 at 2:54 pm #1692373Recked
ParticipantAnyone tried the REG AICPA sample?
A few things caught me while working through the problems.
4 out of 5 for MCQs, and about 11 out of 17 on the SIMs.
Depreciation on the car snagged me, resulting in 2 of the incorrect. Foolish mistake.
The AAA and tax basis I screwed up on, another 2 foolish mistakes.
Rushed on the DRS and missed one thing on the land, and then wasn't sure which to pick on the van trade in, had it down to 2 and picked the wrong one, my other option would have been correct.
Overall not horrible.But… that research took me way too long.
I finally narrowed it down to the correct word to search for. Perhaps if I had know the name to that rule I would have been able to do it faster.
Definitely not as intuitive as the FAR and AUD research was.Going to try and hammer out the MCQs on exam day in 30-40 minutes per testlet to leave as much time as possible on SIMs so I can slow it down and review/think.
January 12, 2018 at 3:09 pm #1692382Lentilcounter
Participant@Recked
I did the AICPA REG practice exam back in December. Back then, I had similar scores on the multiple choice but really bombed the SIMs. This was before I understood section 1033, MACRs, etc. I plan to do it again on Tuesday or Wednesday.
Shoot for 1.5 hours to knock out the 76 MCQ and 2.5 hours for the 7 SIMs.
BEC = 72 (6/08/16)
FAR = ?
REG = ?
AUD = ?January 12, 2018 at 3:28 pm #1692386Recked
ParticipantHeads up.
The 2018 preview sample CPA exam has 5 testlets. Each MCQ testlet has 5 questions and each of the 3, 4, and 5 testlet have 2 SIMs each.
Some of the SIMs repeat what is in the 2017 example, but I think there are 2 new SIMs.
The new version shows the research question having 2 possible answers, so that's interesting.It's formatted for a 23″ screen.
If you don't have a 23″ screen you can't see the submit testlet button to move on to the next testlets.
I would suggest you hold CTRL and hit – (minus) on your keyboard to “shrink” the zoom on the webpage to 80% (or whatever size you need to see the full example).
I have a 22″ widescreen and was able to see the full screen at 80%.One of the SIMs deals specifically with distributions from an S corp so that should be good for you guys struggling with that topic.
https://exams.aicpa.org/cpaexam/Start.html
Also, they are not kidding about needing the 7 digit code.
Don't think its just a sample and ignore that code, LOL.
You will need to restart the sample, and it does not let you pass without it.January 12, 2018 at 4:37 pm #1692409Lentilcounter
Participant@Recked
Thanks for the info! I just took a look at it. I was told both by AICPA and NASBA that we wouldn't get the 2018 format of the exam until April 1, 2018. As for the actual AICPA practice test, I am impressed. This is starting to look more like a legit practice test and less like an appetizer.
BEC = 72 (6/08/16)
FAR = ?
REG = ?
AUD = ?January 13, 2018 at 9:08 am #1692533Recked
ParticipantAgreed, we will not have the new format of the exam, but you just might end up with a similar SIM.
I had similar SIMs in AUD and FAR, at least one on each if I recall correctly, as compared to the sample.January 13, 2018 at 9:46 am #1692551Lentilcounter
ParticipantI've been trying to tie up some loose ends in entity taxation. Here are some of my notes from corporations and section 351.
Section 351:
– control is ownership of 80% or more of the voting power of stock and 80% or more of the shares of each class of nonvoting stock of the corporation
– stock exchanged for services does not count towards 80%, the FMV of the stock is gross income to the shareholder, and the shareholder’s basis in the stock exchanged for services is the FMV
– if liabilities relieved exceed of FMV of property, use number total of liabilities minus adjusted basis of property to calculate gain
– if liabilities are transferred in property for stock in tax avoidance, recognize the entire gainSection 351 control test met, no boot received in cash or liabilities relieved:
Gain recognized by shareholder = no gain or loss is recognized
Basis in shareholder’s stock = adjusted basis of property contributed + gain recognized by shareholder – cash received – liabilities relieved
Corp.’s basis in property = adjusted basis of property contributed + gain recognized by shareholderSection 351 control test met, boot received in cash and liabilities relieved (less than FMV of property contributed):
Gain recognized by shareholder = cash received
Basis in shareholder’s stock = adjusted basis of property + gain recognized by shareholder – cash received – liabilities relieved
Corp.’s basis in property = adjusted basis of property contributed + gain recognized by shareholderSection 351 control test not met, boot received in cash, and liabilities relieved (less than FMV of property contributed):
Gain recognized by shareholder = FMV of property contributed – adjusted basis of property
Basis in shareholder’s stock = adjusted basis of property + gain recognized by shareholder – cash received – liabilities relieved
Corp.’s basis in property = adjusted basis of property + gain recognized by shareholderBEC = 72 (6/08/16)
FAR = ?
REG = ?
AUD = ?January 13, 2018 at 10:28 am #1692565Recked
Participant951/1184 ~ 80.3% I'm back into the tax stuff and pulling that average back up. Still working on questions unseen/first pass.
About 100 more questions in 1040 and 50 in C corp to go. 1341 total MCQs in my course.
Low cumulative total % was down to about 78 after I got through the rest of the law questions.
86% Estates 85% Pships 88% Scorps
Currently 78% and 79% on 1040 and 1120C through 100 MCQs each.
5 more days to go!!January 13, 2018 at 11:18 am #1692581Recked
ParticipantBack in c corps and get a 40% and then a 90%.
I haven't had a 40 on a quiz since FAR.
Demoralizing.January 13, 2018 at 11:58 am #1692595Katie
Participant@Recked, based on all of your posts, I'm sure you will be just fine. Just keep at it these next few days and you'll come out on top.
On the ACIPA practice exam, I can't figure out why the “Remaining basis before sale using the actual expense method since purchase” on testlet 4, sim 1 is $14,600.
January 13, 2018 at 12:05 pm #1692601Recked
ParticipantActual basis = 20k
Depreciable basis = 15k for 75% business use.
Remember half year depr since asset was sold in year 2.
16% instead of 32% per MACRS schedule.I got caught on the same issue. I had the 75% limitation for business use, but missed that half year convention.
I think this is the problem you are talking about, recalling it from memory from yesterday.
Don't forget to try the 2017 sample exam too as there is another SIM that is not in 2018 version.
January 13, 2018 at 12:26 pm #1692611Katie
ParticipantYes, that's the problem I was referencing. I think I'm understanding the depreciation part, I'm just not understanding how they're getting a basis of $14,600 in year 2. If the depreciable basis is 15K and was sold in year 2, I thought you would've taken 20% in yr 1 and 16% in yr 2 for a basis before sale of $9,600.
Ohhhh I just made sense of it by typing that out. $9,600 + the non-depreciable basis of $5,000 = $14,600
That makes so much more sense. I'm nervous making dumb mistakes like this so close to test day…January 13, 2018 at 12:39 pm #1692620Recked
ParticipantI should not have said Depreciable Basis.
Just so we don't confuse anyone else.
The full 20k is the depreciable basis, but then the actual depreciation expense is limited by business use %.
So you would take the full 20k x 20% = 4000 in the first year, limited to 75% = 3000 depreciation expense
year 2 20k x 32% (16% for half year) = 3200 limited to 75% for business use = 2400 Depr Exp
20000 – 3000 – 2400 = 14,600The business use % limit will apply for each year, and can change depending on how much the asset is used in business.
I just thought it was important to clarify so no one gets confused.I noticed this question (perhaps intentionally) used depreciation amounts that are LOWER than the max threshold for personal autos.
Keep in mind those limits would have applied if business use was 100%.
Not sure if the exam will go that in depth, but its important to know.January 13, 2018 at 2:04 pm #1692647dj
ParticipantMy understanding is that the order of depreciation is Section 179, bonus depreciation, and then MACRS.
Let’s say equipment cost $800K and it’s 5-year for MACRS purposes.
The adjusted basis in year 1 would be:
$800K (initial basis) – $500K (Section 179) – *$150K (bonus depreciation) = $150 adjusted basis
*$300K (basis after deducting section 179) X .50 = $150K (bonus depreciation)
My question is for the next year would the basis be $300K (basis after deducting 179) or would the basis be $150K (basis after deduction 179 and bonus)?
I believe the basis for the next year would be $300K but I’m not entirely sure.
January 13, 2018 at 2:25 pm #1692655Recked
ParticipantThe adjusted basis would be 150k.
You can't depreciate on the 300k or you would be double dipping, ie: claiming depreciation in years 2-5 that was already taken in year 1.
I also think you would get sec179, plus the 50% bonus, leaving 150k that would then begin depreciation in year 1 under MACRS for an additional 20% of the remaining 150k. -
AuthorReplies
- The topic ‘REG Study Group – Q1 2018 - Page 14’ is closed to new replies.