REG Study Group – Q2 2018 - Page 8

Viewing 15 replies - 106 through 120 (of 301 total)
  • Author
    Replies
  • #1772939
    Mario
    Participant

    Hello everyone,

    Hope you all area great progress in your studies.
    I'm curious to know if there is anyone taking the CPA exam in Indiana or Kentucky, might be helpful to get in touch with someone and be a study buddy, keeping each other accountable.
    My REG is scheduled for June 9th.

    Thank you and good luck 🙂

    #1773465
    msquared17
    Participant

    Hello,

    I just started REG today. Planning to take June 8 or July 3. Will decide in a few weeks. I want to make sure I give myself enough time to study.

    Anyone using Becker and Ninja at the same time? I used Ninja asa supplement to for FAR after I completed all of Becker.

    Happy studying.

    #1773660
    Dr. Richard Kimble
    Participant

    Hi All,

    Tough Simulation Here: Simulation # 65 – Asset Valuation (you can skim through the Full TBS I copied/paste down below)

    QUESTION – Did anybody find a great explanation answer for the below Simulation # 65?

    The executor of Munson's estate made the election to adopt the alternative valuation date for the estate's assets. The estate of Munson is composed of the following assets:

    Fair Market Value Asset
    April 1, Year 2
    (Date of Death)
    October 1, Year 2
    6,000 share of Bartlet Corp. common stock
    $600,000
    $552,000
    $200,000 Zenon Corp. 3% 20-year bonds, due Year 16.
    Interest payable quarterly on February 1, May 1, August 1,
    and November 1.
    $200,000
    $195,000
    $320,000 Vision Corp. 5% 15-year bonds, due Year 13.
    Interest payable quarterly on January 1, April 1, July 1,
    and October 1.
    $320,000
    $310,000

    The executor provided the following information relating to the administration of the estate.
    Interest accrued on the Zenon bonds from February 1 to April 1, Year 2, was deposited by the executor on May 1, Year 2.
    Interest accrued on the Vision bonds from January 1 to April 1, Year 2, was deposited by the executor on May 1, Year 2.
    A cash dividend of $2 per share was declared by Bartlet on March 10, was paid on April 1, Year 2, to holders of record on March 31, Year 2, and was deposited by the executor on April 15, Year 2.
    On July 1, Year 2, 2,000 shares of Bartlet were distributed to a beneficiary when the fair market value was $96 per share.
    On July 31, Year 2, 1,000 shares of Bartlet were sold for $97 per share.
    On August 15, Year 2, the Zenon bonds were distributed to a beneficiary with a value of $194,000 on the date of distribution.

    The Vision bonds and the remaining 3,000 shares of Bartlet were not sold or disposed of within six months following death and remained in the estate.

    Click the shaded cells in the “Alternative Value” column and enter the value for each assets that would be reported on the federal estate tax return using the alternative valuation date. If a response is zero, enter a zero (“0”).

    #1773880
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Hello, Msquared17!

    I’m also using Becker and aiming to finish Becker in 2 weeks so I can start NINJA MCQs immediately. I played Gearty’s lectures (except skills practice sessions) without listening to them. I’m doing that so I could get to the progress rate I need to be in. I skipped Gearty’s lectures because he's merely DIRECTING students HOW TO ANNOTATE EBOOK.

    I hope you decide NOW to take REG on June 8, or perhaps June 9/10th.

    Let’s do it!

    #1775157
    DoubleBogey
    Participant

    Question 1
    sub.disc.tax.pos.001
    Taxpayer Clegg would certainly like to take a particular deduction that is barred by an IRS regulation. However, after considerable research Clegg's tax attorney believes that there is a one-third chance that a court would overturn the regulation as invalidly promulgated by the IRS. What should Clegg do?

    Take the deduction without disclosure. My Initial answer

    Take the deduction, but disclose it. Correct Answer

    Not take the deduction.

    All of the above.

    You Answered Correctly!
    Choice B: Correct! With disclosure, Clegg can avoid an underpayment penalty even if the position is ultimately rejected because there is a reasonable basis (≥ 20% chance of approval) for it.

    Is this question not backwards? A 1/3 chance of it being overturned is well over 50% odds in your favor. Why is disclosure necessary as the odds are substantial?

    #1775175
    mskcle
    Participant

    When I am reading it I see it as there is a 33% chance of the disclosure winning against the IRS regulation. However, I do not necessarily understand the need for disclosure as most substantial authority cases (33-50%) are undisclosed. I get the avoidance of a penalty for reasonable basis standard, but as I mentioned my understanding is a 33% chance of succeeding in the over ruling.

    #1775182
    DoubleBogey
    Participant

    @mskcle I read it as 1/3 chance it got overturned, thus a 67% chance that the deduction would be upheld, but that would give us the same answer either way for the purposes of this question.

    #1775208
    mskcle
    Participant

    After looking at my notes (from Becker's book) this is what I am taking away:

    Frivolous <20%
    Reasonable Standard 20-33%
    Substantial Authority 34-50%
    More likely than Not 51+%

    Based on that I guess it would be a reasonable standard in which you would need to disclose to avoid penalty. I don't know if thats over the top thinking, but it makes sense to me based on the tricky wording in these books.

    #1775406
    Tim
    Participant

    Of the 4 sections I'm finding REG to be by far the most boring and tiresome. So much memorization of crap you would just look up or let your tax program figure out in actual practice. Then on top of that I'm learning the old tax code which is already irrelevant. I know there aren't that many changes but still. Sorry, had to gripe a little.

    #1776046
    Determined24
    Participant

    Hi Guys:

    I am taking REG for the 4th time in Q2. My first take was Dec 2016. I got 58. I am new to US Tax. I then retake it 55 both times using Gleim. Then I went to class and changed to Wiley, I finally understand the concepts esp basis. Then I got 63. So now is my 4th take I am supplementing Wiley with Becker and Ninja Mcq and I am nervous. I am booked for June 2. My exam questions seem to be the same topic from time to time. I was comparable in the simulations. What am I not seeing in the mcq. Maybe I am not spending enough time on the testlets.
    Any ideas on how to study for a 4th retake to just knock that 75.

    #1776115
    dab88
    Participant

    long term capital gain and loss ?

    Short term capital gain and loss?

    Does anyone know the rule for when these items are added or subtracted from a tax basis for c corp s corp partnership ect?

    #1776120
    Tncincy
    Participant

    Is anyone using Becker Flash cards for reg? any tips? I was using Ninja only, but my family surprised me with Becker for my birthday. I am still not sure about it but was wondering about the flashcards.

    It begins with a 75
    Been here too long as a cheerleader....ready to pass

    #1776483
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Opps

    #1776829
    DoubleBogey
    Participant

    So my dear friend WileyCPAExcel is dropping tax question sims on me in the ethics section. Had no idea alimony was taxable but child support isn't. Thanks Wiley for testing me on crap that I won't even see until May in your software

    Sincerely,
    Frustrated CPA Candidate

    #1776862
    JRG24
    Participant

    @jsdailey. I too have wiley and am disappointed in the study material. Too many typos and odd things like you mentioned. I paid for the platinum course and I really expected more for the price I paid. For what they charge for the product should be completely polished with no material errors of any sort.

Viewing 15 replies - 106 through 120 (of 301 total)
  • The topic ‘REG Study Group – Q2 2018 - Page 8’ is closed to new replies.