REG Study Group – Q2 2018 - Page 4

Viewing 15 replies - 46 through 60 (of 301 total)
  • Author
    Replies
  • #1753427
    Lexi
    Participant

    Any retakers that can testify due dates and extensions are no longer tested??

    #1753505
    CS
    Participant

    Also curious about the due dates/extension dates as @Lexi mentioned….Roger's review clearly states in bold after every mention of the dates that they are no longer tested. Granted it's not the most complicated thing in the world but if it's unnecessary why bother..

    #1754022
    mskcle
    Participant

    what is everyones strategies with eh phase outs? I understand which items have phase out limitations but I can not seem to wrap my head around memorizing the numbers for each item and filing status..

    #1754025
    mskcle
    Participant

    what is everyones strategies with the phase outs? I understand which items have phase out limitations, but I can not seem to wrap my head around memorizing the numbers for each item and filing status..

    #1754226
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    As of today, I’ve completed 0 of 10 steps 17% with my REG Becker. Almost 90% done with R1. My goal for this week was to finish R1 and R2, man, it’s taking forever! I’m even passing Gearty’s lectures forward because I am not learning as much as I needed to. I learn better and save time if I just read the EBook (without watching Gearty’s lectures), write my own notes, complete the practice skills, and MCQs per module.

    #1755731
    mskcle
    Participant

    On March 1, Green went to Easy Car Sales to buy a car. Green spoke to a salesperson and agreed to buy a car that Easy had in its showroom. On March 5, Green made a $500 down payment and signed a secu­rity agreement to secure the payment of the balance of the purchase price. On March 10, Green picked up the car. On March 15, Easy filed the security agreement. On what date did Easy’s security interest attach?

    Becker says the right answer is March 10th. Ninja says the correct answer is March 5th. Thoughts on this?

    #1755772
    NPH3
    Participant

    Taking REG tomorrow! Not sure how to feel about it because I have prepped the best I can. I do know that I do not feel as confident as I did with FAR walking into the test. I always am pretty confident in my MCQ because of Becker and Ninja but hopefully that continues… anyways here goes nothing!

    #1756013
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Will be joining you all on this journey this week. Giving myself about 8 weeks, at 20-25 hours a week, hopefully that is enough to get me ready before Q2 ends.

    Any opinions on Wiley? I've used it for FAR/AUD so far and wow is it a drag. I attempt to get through their material asap, then switch over to Ninja audio/notes to reinforce

    #1756291
    Defo
    Participant

    @NPH3, Please report back with your experience. Good Luck today!!

    @The_Benjamins- I am using Wiley as well, I feel like I am passing these things in spite of Wiley, not because of it. Becker lectures and text are levels above Wiley IMO.

    #1756328
    CS
    Participant

    Good luck @NPH3, you got this!

    I used Wiley for FAR and I feel like you @Defo, that I passed in spite of it. I know a lot of people promote Wiley, but in hindsight I still can't believe I passed FAR. It has nothing to do with the material itself or a lack of information form Wiley, as it was my first exam and followed Wiley's study guide/guidelines to a T. In hindsight, not a fan of the MCQ format at all, and can't stand their text format. The only text I read for Wiley's FAR was probably NFP/Gov't.

    That being said, I've switched to Roger as my primary course since and feel much more comfortable. I tried starting Audit with Wiley and knew after the first couple of lessons it wasn't going to cut it. That being said to each their own.

    Oh yeah, and the interface. I remember the Wiley updates which would completely scramble my lesson plan. At the time I didn't mind, but I have a much better routine of how I approach my studies now that I'm on the last exam, I'd probably flip if that happened.

    #1756475
    spandey27
    Participant

    Can anyone please help with this question? Gleim and Becker has two different responses and I am confused.

    Kent Corp. is a calendar year accrual basis C corporation. In Year 1, Kent made a nonliquidating distribution of property with an adjusted basis of $150,000 and a fair market value of $200,000 to Reed, its sole shareholder.

    The following information pertains to Kent:

    Reed's basis in Kent stock at January 1, Year 1, $500,000

    Accumulated earnings and profits at January 1, Year 1, $125,000

    Current earnings and profits for Year 1 (from operations) $60,000

    What was taxable as dividend income to Reed for Year 1?

    a. $200,000

    b. $60,000

    c. $185,000

    d. $150,000

    Explanation:

    Choice “a” is correct. A dividend paid in property other than money is taxable to an individual taxpayer to the extent of the property's fair market value, but not in excess of the current and accumulated earnings and profits of the distributing corporation. In this case the fair market value of the dividend is $200,000. It is taxable to the extent that Kent had current earnings ($60,000) plus accumulated earnings and profits ($125,000) plus any gain generated on the distribution itself ($50,000); thus the dividend is taxable to the extent of $200,000. This is Becker's response

    (c) $185,000. In a non-liquidating distribution, dividend income is recognized only to the extent of the earnings
    and profits of the corporation. Any excess of the distribution over the E & P represents a return of the taxpayer's
    basis in his stock. Reed must recognize dividend income of $185,000. This is in Gleim.

    Which one is correct?

    #1756519
    mskcle
    Participant

    According to Becker, when the property dividend is of appreciated property the Corp must recognize a gain for the appreciation which creates additional E&P which would validate the additional 15,000 difference between 200,000 and 185,000. This makes me believe 200,000 would be correct

    #1756985
    spandey27
    Participant

    Ok thank you @mskcle. It's so annoying that different sources says different answers. I just noticed your question above as well. so unsure. are you using Ninja and Becker for reg?

    #1757185
    mskcle
    Participant

    I'm using both which does make it really conflicting when you see contradicting answers especially when you are not 100% on the topic.

    #1757272
    spandey27
    Participant

    Exactly, now i am so confused. if that same question comes with different numbers, what should i keep as an answer.

Viewing 15 replies - 46 through 60 (of 301 total)
  • The topic ‘REG Study Group – Q2 2018 - Page 4’ is closed to new replies.