REG Study Group – Q2 2018 - Page 3

Viewing 15 replies - 31 through 45 (of 301 total)
  • Author
    Replies
  • #1748127
    vorobjeva44
    Participant

    I took the exam and I had 2 Mch questions. Just know classifications- foreign tax credit, EIC, business tax credit= those three are testable…

    #1748181
    kloss
    Participant

    I am taking exam on 4/30, it's my retake. I am using Wiley (mainly on Wiley), then Roger, and the last is Becker. I only study Wiley textbook and study Ninja note.
    It's a lot, but, I need to pass this one.

    #1748240
    whitneyrussell
    Participant

    Hi All,

    I am currently studying for Reg and I came upon the following question during my review, however, I do not understand how the explanation was given from my review course. Would anyone know the reasoning behind this recognition question.

    Question
    Pursuant to a plan of corporate reorganization adopted in July of Year 1, Gow exchanged 500 shares of Lad Corp. common stock that he bought in Jnauary of Year 1 at a cost of $5,000 for 100 shares of Rock Corp. common stock having a fair market value of $6,000. Gow's recognized gain on this exchange was:

    a. $1,000 long term capital gain
    b. $1,000 short term capital gain
    c. $1,000 ordinary income
    d. $0.

    Answer:d
    There are seven types of tax-free reorganizations. This problem reflects the tax-free nature of a reorganization. The gain Gow realizes on his stock is $1,000 (FMV of $6,000 less basis of $5,000). None of this gain is recognized, so there is a postponed gain of $1,000. Gow's basis in the new stock of Rock Corporation is computed to be $5,000 (FMV of Rock stock $6,000 less postponed gain of $1,000).

    #1748439
    vorobjeva44
    Participant

    A CPA assists a taxpayer in tax planning regarding a transaction that meets the definition of a tax shelter as defined in the Internal Revenue Code. Under the AICPA Statements on Standards for Tax Services, the CPA should inform the taxpayer of the penalty risks unless the transaction, at the minimum, meets which of the following standards for being sustained if challenged?

    A. More likely than not.
    B. Not frivolous.
    C. Substantial authority.
    D. Realistic possibility.

    #1748655
    vorobjeva44
    Participant

    Today is Saturday… My bf went out with friends and I am studying for REG 🙁

    #1748657
    vorobjeva44
    Participant

    This question is interesting. I didn't see in Becker that info. Employer should keep info of his employed tax return preparers for 2 years 🙂

    Which of the following is false regarding the filing of information returns concerning employees who prepare tax returns?

    A. Annual listings of preparers, identification numbers, and place of work are required for preparers who employ others to prepare returns.
    B. No information return is actually required to be submitted; a list is made and kept by the employing preparer.
    C. The period for which the information return is required is a 12-month period beginning July 1 of each year.
    D. Information returns of income tax return preparers must be maintained by the preparer for 2 years.

    Answer (D) is correct.
    Under Sec. 6060(a), a person who employs one or more tax return preparers to prepare a return or claim for refund must file a return setting forth the name, identifying number, and place of work of each income tax return preparer employed by him or her. Section 6060(b) allows the IRS to approve an alternative method of reporting. Regulation 1.6060-1 states that the requirements of Sec. 6060 are satisfied by retaining a record of the name, identifying number, and principal place of work of each income tax return preparer employed and by making that record available for inspection upon request by the commissioner for the 3-year period following the close of the return period to which that record relates. The return period means the 12-month period beginning July 1 of each year [Reg. 1.6060-1(b)].

    #1748813
    Defo
    Participant

    An individual taxpayer reports the following items for the current year:

    Ordinary income from Partnership A, operating a movie theater
    in which the taxpayer materially participates: $70,000
    Net loss from Partnership B, operating an equipment rental
    business in which the taxpayer does not materially participate: (9,000)
    Rental income from building rented to a third party: 7,000
    Short-term capital gain from sale of stock: 4,000

    What is the taxpayer's adjusted gross income for the year?
    A.

    $70,000
    B.

    $72,000
    C.

    $74,000
    D.

    $77,000

    Why can't they use the mom and pop exception here?

    #1749015
    kloss
    Participant

    Can someone help me below question? (Partnership question from Wiley)
    12/31/2016, L&E were equal partners in a partnership with net assets having a tax basis and FMV of $150,000. On 1/2/2017, G contributed securities with FMV of $75,000 (purchased in 2012 at a cost of $51,000) to become an equal partner in the new firm. The securities were sold on 7/1/2017 for $78,000 .How much of the partnership's gain from the sale of these securities should be allocated to G?

    The answer is $25,000

    Thank you for help

    #1750280
    huskyy123
    Participant

    Hello,

    I want to know if I am thinking these items through correctly:

    On the K-1 for partnership returns, is item 1 ( ordinary business income) a non separately stated item, even though it is reported on the k-1? So in essence a partners share of nonseparately stated income or loss would be item 1 of the k-1 or known as ordinary business income/loss?

    In addition, the rest of the items on a k-1 (2-20) are the partners share of separately stated income/loss?

    Thanks in advance

    #1750730
    trk85718
    Participant

    @kloss The difference btw the FMV and NBV of the asset is a built in gain to the contributing partner (51-75 ='s $24000). The remaining gain is split btw the 3 partners (51 – 78 = 27 – 24 = 3 ) $1,000 to each partner. So the contributing partners total gain is $25,000

    #1751868
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    @vorobjeva44 and others using Ninja, how did you guys do on ninja ethics and business law? I'm averaging 80 on both right now and feel like i'm not really getting it yet

    #1751874
    Nate
    Participant

    Just scheduled REG for June 9th at 8:30 AM! This is the last exam I need to pass and I need to pass it by January. I've never taken REG before and I passed the other three on my second try, so hopefully I can pass REG on the first try unlike the other three. I will start studying as soon as busy season ends. Glad I found this forum! I'll probably use it as I'm studying.

    #1752069
    dab88
    Participant

    Can I get away with using a REG 2017 book for studying?

    #1752117
    vorobjeva44
    Participant

    Another72 I think if you averaging 80s on ninja- you are more than fine. Focus on tax now.

    #1752167
    spandey27
    Participant

    Does anyone have a good summary of Basis, Distributions, Gain and loss for S Coprp, C corp and Partnerships? I feel like I study one and forget another and I am finding a good way to master these? Can anyone help if you have strategy for this section?

Viewing 15 replies - 31 through 45 (of 301 total)
  • The topic ‘REG Study Group – Q2 2018 - Page 3’ is closed to new replies.