- This topic has 18 replies, 11 voices, and was last updated 10 years, 5 months ago by .
-
Topic
-
Took REG yesterday and like everyone else I don’t know if I passed. I used Becker and WTB to prepare. This was my last part and scored in the 80s/90s on the first three parts. Without being specific, I was astounded by how much of my exam tested obscure topics that were barely covered in the review materials or were absent from the review materials. Whereas entire sections of review material went untested. What is the point of this testing approach? How does this help the profession? Honestly, it seems like more of a disservice to the profession. Very important and relevant topics should be the ones most highly tested. What a joke! Especially when someone puts in months of hard work! Time for the score release lottery.
BEC - 91 Jan. 2014
AUD - 86 Feb. 2014
FAR - 85 May 2014
REG - 68 Aug. 2014 Retake Oct. 2014
- The topic ‘REG thoughts’ is closed to new replies.