[str6116]

I wanna say I’m surprised, but with how out there these sims can be… Not really I guess. Obviously can’t give away any specifics but hopefully it’s ok for me to just say it was on these 2 methods that were mentioned in the Becker book as methods used for tax purposes – but not a whole lot said about it. It’s not like it gave me a review of how to do it. Sure enough I basically had to do it. It did ask for some different things than what I’d probably be asked for FAR though, and there’s a chance maybe I overthought it – but man the way it was presented was like something I’d expect to see on FAR.

If I was fresh off FAR, I may have done better on it. Had a rough idea of what to do but had to play around with numbers… Maybe it’s a pre test one. Sadly some of my other sims were also educated guesses, feels somewhat similar to my AUD experience in which I was “weaker” in the sims. Time will tell.

I know FAR-like sims are possible for AUD but has anyone gotten one for REG?

FAR-82 (7/27/15)
AUD-74 (8/31/15), 92 (1/4/16)
REG-65 (10/28/15), 70 (6/9/16), 80 (7/18/16)
BEC-86 (11/28/15)

DONE

...and that's all the people need to know.

[steven]

I just had one today…. have not taken Far yet and it's been a while since I took reporting. It was murder. And the authoritative lit was useless. It required knowledge of percentage of completion vs completed contract method which was not covered in ANY of the Reg material I used (Wiley, Ninja).

I'm not one to believe in the efficacy of prayer, buy holy cow I hope that's a pretest one. If it was pre-test, I should be in good shape…will know in a few weeks….The wait is the hardest part

[Paydirt123]

I took REG in October, FAR in July. Totally had a FAR like SIM on REG.

[Author]

Replies