Pass rates Q3 2014 posted - Page 2

Viewing 7 replies - 16 through 22 (of 22 total)
  • Author
    Replies
  • #614981
    jeff
    Keymaster

    (3-2)/2 = 50%

    3 is 50% more than 2.

    #614982
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    I guess you could say that 3 is 150% of 2, and the excess of 3 over 2 (1) is 50% of 2 (lol, dunno if that makes sense).

    Ahhh, I don't know why I became an accountant when I hate math.

    #614983
    juuustin
    Member

    I think aisforaaron should take a breather on the sidelines for a bit… 🙂

    MD Candidate: 10/1/14

    FAR - 87 (11/23/14)
    REG - 87 (1/30/15)
    BEC - 89 (4/19/15)
    AUD - 98 (5/30/15)

    Ethics - 100

    Experience - In Progress!

    #614984
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    @ juuustin: No, I'm good. This quote from my previous post explains mine and someone else's confusion: “Edit: The confusion comes from comparing the difference between the two (10.49) and the percentage difference between the two (22.13%). I see how we were confused originally.” And your post implies there was some hostility in the first place to need to take a breather. Just simply read/understood it wrong in the beginning.

    #614985
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    You could say “a 22% difference” or a “difference of 10 percentage points.” The former, ‘percentage difference between percentages' method is correct, but it is the kind of statistical spinning technique used by talking heads generally trying to mislead.

    e.g., “Unemployment rate dropped 5% this year” (when it went from 10% to 9.5%)

    #614986
    jeff
    Keymaster

    Can't a guy just have an attention-gathering headline? 🙂

    #614987
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    @Jeff – I think your attention-gathering worked!

Viewing 7 replies - 16 through 22 (of 22 total)
  • The topic ‘Pass rates Q3 2014 posted - Page 2’ is closed to new replies.