Passed in NJ but looking to Illinois for license

  • Creator
    Topic
  • #159539
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    I passed all 4 parts in NJ and now realize I don’t meet the experience requirements as I do not have an active in-good-standing CPA to certify my experience. I’m researching getting a Certificate of License from Illinois, but am confused by two different methods I’m finding:

    n

    1. Licensed CPA by Acceptance of Examination. Unless i’m missing something, it appears that I can apply for a Licensed CPA and that my experience does NOT have to be certified by an active CPA. Does anyone have experience in this area?

    n

    2. Transfer of Exam Credit by Illinois Board of Examiners. The website (https://www.illinois-cpa-exam.com/certification/transfer-exam-credit) says: “An individual who has passed the entire Uniform CPA Examination in another state or jurisdiction, but is ineligible to obtain certification from that state/jurisdiction may transfer their exam credit and receive Illinois certification.” Does anyone know what they mean by “certification”?

    n

    I’ve tried calling the IL board of accountancy, but am getting a busy signal. If I hear anything from them directly, I will post.

    n

    Thanks!n

    n

Viewing 8 replies - 1 through 8 (of 8 total)
  • Author
    Replies
  • #268590
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    browse thru this site and locate the thread that touxhes on this topic as breaking news frm illinois….folks were rejoicing over the fact that they can now be certified in illinois with no experience or CPA sign off……………………..so go look up the thread heren

    n

    #268591
    HappyCow
    Participant

    ackistner,

    n

    I'm on the same boat, except that I'm in California (and still have to pass FAR…) I have no “general” work experience and unlikely to be able to get it in the near future. If you can get an answer from IL state board, could you please post it here? I'd really appreciate it!n

    n

    California, Bisk user
    Passed: AUD (8/2010), BEC & REG (11/2010)
    FAR (ugh!)- Retake Feb 2011

    #268592
    kreeta
    Participant

    And on a related note, if you are licenced in IL for example, can you practise with that license in another state?n

    n

    #268593
    Happy
    Participant

    I'm in the process of licensing in CO but live in TX & was very confused with Substantial Equivalency rules. This was interesting info. I came across which might be useful to some of you
    n:Substantial Equivalency
    nThe concept of Substantial Equivalency was developed to allow licensed CPAs to practice across jurisdictions more readily. Under Section 23 of the Uniform Accountancy Act (UAA), a CPA with a CPA license in good standing from a jurisdiction with CPA licensing requirements that are essentially equivalent to those outlined in the UAA (degree with 150 hours, minimum 1 year experience and successful completion of the Uniform CPA Examination) may be granted a privilege to practice in another jurisdiction that is not the CPAs principal place of business. Several jurisdictions have adopted a Section 23 privilege to practice. It is the responsibility of the CPA to contact the board of accountancy in the state he/she intends to practice to determine if the state has adopted Section 23 and if it requires notification or payment of a fee. This information may also be found in NASBA's Accountancy Licensing Library.

    n

    NASBA's National Qualification Appraisal Service (NQAS) has reviewed the CPA licensure requirements of its member jurisdictions to determine which CPA licensure requirements are substantially equivalent to the licensure requirements of the UAA. Individuals who are licensed in jurisdictions that are not substantially equivalent may have their credentials evaluated by NASBA's CredentialNet service to determine their individual substantial equivalency.

    n

    Substantially Equivalent States
    nThe National Qualification Appraisal Service has found the following jurisdictions to have CPA licensure requirements that are substantially equivalent to those of the UAA.

    n

    Alabama* Alaska Arizona Arkansas California** CNMI
    nColorado Connecticut Delaware** District of Columbia* Florida Georgia
    nGuam Hawaii* Idaho Illinois* Indiana Iowa
    nKansas* Kentucky Louisiana Maine Maryland Massachusetts
    nMichigan Minnesota Mississippi Missouri Montana* Nebraska*
    nNevada New Hampshire** New Jersey New Mexico New York North Carolina
    nNorth Dakota Ohio Oklahoma* Oregon Pennsylvania** Rhode Island
    nSouth Carolina South Dakota Tennessee Texas Utah Vermont**
    nVirginia Washington West Virginia Wisconsin Wyoming**

    n

    Non-Substantially Equivalent States
    nThe National Qualification Appraisal Service has not found the following jurisdictions to have CPA licensure requirements that are substantially equivalent to those of the UAA.

    n

    Puerto Rico Virgin Islands

    n

    *These states are two-tier. A certificate is initially obtained which does not allow the individual full privileges as a CPA. After additional requirements are met, the certificate holder may receive a license or permit. Only those CPAs holding an active license or permit are considered substantially equivalent.

    n

    **These states currently have more than one path to licensure, with at least one path meeting the 3E criteria of the UAA (baccalaureate degree or higher with 150 semester hours, minimum 1 year experience and Uniform CPA Examination). Based on their current laws/rules, these states have passed legislation terminating the alternative paths within the time limits set forth by the UAA. (The ** notation is informational and does not affect a state's current SE status. At such time as the alternate paths to licensure expire and the 3E criteria is the sole path to licensure in these states, the ** notation will be removed.)

    n

    Rev (12/22/2010)n

    n

    #268594
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    browse thru this site and locate the thread that touxhes on this topic as breaking news frm illinois….folks were rejoicing over the fact that they can now be certified in illinois with no experience or CPA sign off……………………..so go look up the thread here

    #268595
    HappyCow
    Participant

    ackistner,

    I'm on the same boat, except that I'm in California (and still have to pass FAR…) I have no “general” work experience and unlikely to be able to get it in the near future. If you can get an answer from IL state board, could you please post it here? I'd really appreciate it!

    California, Bisk user
    Passed: AUD (8/2010), BEC & REG (11/2010)
    FAR (ugh!)- Retake Feb 2011

    #268596
    kreeta
    Participant

    And on a related note, if you are licenced in IL for example, can you practise with that license in another state?

    #268597
    Happy
    Participant

    I'm in the process of licensing in CO but live in TX & was very confused with Substantial Equivalency rules. This was interesting info. I came across which might be useful to some of you

    :Substantial Equivalency

    The concept of Substantial Equivalency was developed to allow licensed CPAs to practice across jurisdictions more readily. Under Section 23 of the Uniform Accountancy Act (UAA), a CPA with a CPA license in good standing from a jurisdiction with CPA licensing requirements that are essentially equivalent to those outlined in the UAA (degree with 150 hours, minimum 1 year experience and successful completion of the Uniform CPA Examination) may be granted a privilege to practice in another jurisdiction that is not the CPAs principal place of business. Several jurisdictions have adopted a Section 23 privilege to practice. It is the responsibility of the CPA to contact the board of accountancy in the state he/she intends to practice to determine if the state has adopted Section 23 and if it requires notification or payment of a fee. This information may also be found in NASBA's Accountancy Licensing Library.

    NASBA's National Qualification Appraisal Service (NQAS) has reviewed the CPA licensure requirements of its member jurisdictions to determine which CPA licensure requirements are substantially equivalent to the licensure requirements of the UAA. Individuals who are licensed in jurisdictions that are not substantially equivalent may have their credentials evaluated by NASBA's CredentialNet service to determine their individual substantial equivalency.

    Substantially Equivalent States

    The National Qualification Appraisal Service has found the following jurisdictions to have CPA licensure requirements that are substantially equivalent to those of the UAA.

    Alabama* Alaska Arizona Arkansas California** CNMI

    Colorado Connecticut Delaware** District of Columbia* Florida Georgia

    Guam Hawaii* Idaho Illinois* Indiana Iowa

    Kansas* Kentucky Louisiana Maine Maryland Massachusetts

    Michigan Minnesota Mississippi Missouri Montana* Nebraska*

    Nevada New Hampshire** New Jersey New Mexico New York North Carolina

    North Dakota Ohio Oklahoma* Oregon Pennsylvania** Rhode Island

    South Carolina South Dakota Tennessee Texas Utah Vermont**

    Virginia Washington West Virginia Wisconsin Wyoming**

    Non-Substantially Equivalent States

    The National Qualification Appraisal Service has not found the following jurisdictions to have CPA licensure requirements that are substantially equivalent to those of the UAA.

    Puerto Rico Virgin Islands

    *These states are two-tier. A certificate is initially obtained which does not allow the individual full privileges as a CPA. After additional requirements are met, the certificate holder may receive a license or permit. Only those CPAs holding an active license or permit are considered substantially equivalent.

    **These states currently have more than one path to licensure, with at least one path meeting the 3E criteria of the UAA (baccalaureate degree or higher with 150 semester hours, minimum 1 year experience and Uniform CPA Examination). Based on their current laws/rules, these states have passed legislation terminating the alternative paths within the time limits set forth by the UAA. (The ** notation is informational and does not affect a state's current SE status. At such time as the alternate paths to licensure expire and the 3E criteria is the sole path to licensure in these states, the ** notation will be removed.)

    Rev (12/22/2010)

Viewing 8 replies - 1 through 8 (of 8 total)
  • The topic ‘Passed in NJ but looking to Illinois for license’ is closed to new replies.