Why recognize loss?

  • Creator
    Topic
  • #189242
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    On January 2 of the current year, LTTI Co. entered into a three-year, noncancelable contract to buy up to 1,000,000 units of a product each year at $.10 per unit with a minimum annual guarantee purchase of 200,000 units. At year-end, LTTI had only purchased 80,000 units and decided to cancel sales of the product. What amount should LTTI report as a loss related to the purchase commitment as of December 31 of the current year?

    A. $0

    B. $8,000

    C. $12,000

    D. $52,000

    LTTI had a purchase commitment for 600,000 units (200,000 × 3) and purchased 80,000 units. By canceling sales of the product, LTTI has a loss of $52,000 (520,000 units × .10).


    Why is LTTI recognizing a loss? It doesn’t say anything about any costs of breaking a contract. LTTI promises to buy X amount, and did not buy that amount. Shouldn’t it be the seller that recognizes the loss, not the buyer?

Viewing 1 replies (of 1 total)
  • Author
    Replies
  • #612508

    The contract is noncancellable, so LTTI must still purchase those additional minimum units and take a loss on them.

    REG - 87 (Becker)
    AUD - 96 (Becker & Ninja MCQs)
    FAR - 85 (Becker, Ninja MCQs, Audio and Blitz)
    BEC - Last one! Waiting on score release 11/24!

    Remember: a journey of a thousand miles begins with a single step

Viewing 1 replies (of 1 total)
  • The topic ‘Why recognize loss?’ is closed to new replies.