[rsouxlja7]

1. Is CPAExcel enough or do I need to supplement with additional MCQs?

2. If more MCQs are needed, should I purchase Ninja or use cpareviewforfree?

3. What does a CPAExcel practice exam score tend to translate to on FAR? For example, for those who have used it, what was your CPAExcel practice score and your actual FAR score?

Created with Compare Ninja

FAR - 94
AUD - 90
BEC - 86
REG - 87

[Anonymous]

From what I understand the testbank (no matter with which review course) consist of questions released by the AICPA, so they should be pretty similar. Personally, I was only using CPAExcel until I failed REG and FAR twice. I switched to only using NINJA MCQs, audio, and notes. I like the layout of the MCQs much better and how the results are displayed. Not sure how the trending scores relate but I finally passed REG and owe it to NINJA.

[tom411]

I felt like CPAexcel did a good job preparing me for FAR, although I haven't gotten my score back yet. Also, there is a Ton of MCQ's for FAR in CPAexcel – as long as you go through all of the questions and have a good understanding of the solutions, I really don't think it's necessary to buy a supplement.

[okcpa2015]

I used CPAExcel only for FAR. Scored a 94 on the practice exam and had an actual score of 91. Hopes that answers your question.

FAR - 91
REG - 88
AUD - 98
BEC - 88

[yuke78]

I used CPAExcel on FAR first time around, failed and switched to NINJA MCQ and got an 82. I think this really only worked for me because I had already gone through the “formal” material once, and i just needed to drill concepts more. So that's what I did and it worked for me.

[Author]

Replies