Sometimes IFRS makes more sense than GAAP

  • Creator
    Topic
  • #162030
    Yvonne570
    Member

    Long term vs short term liability: GAAP allows for long term debt “expected” to be refinanced in the future as short term to be disclosed as short term – IFRS requires companies to wait. LOL. I agree. Why complicate matters? I mean – what if it doesn’t happen? Why should we give them the advantage of future potential decisions?

    Completed contract method: Yeah IFRS for doing away with it:)

    LIFO: another yeah – why should we go backwards?

    I’m still early on in the review for FAR; however, I seem to be stronger with IFRS in quite a few areas.

    AUD - Passed:)
    FAR - Passed:)
    REG - Retake TBD
    BEC - Missed by 3 points Retake TBD

Viewing 5 replies - 1 through 5 (of 5 total)
  • Author
    Replies
  • #301256
    mla1169
    Participant

    ugh, don't even get me going on IFRS. I am taking my last (yay) masters course this semester and its International Accounting. not sure if its a severe case of “senioritis” or that it really IS torture, but I am just about all power point presentationed out.

    FAR- 77
    AUD -49, 71, 84
    REG -56,75!
    BEC -75

    Massachusetts CPA (non reporting) since 3/12.

    #301257
    Yvonne570
    Member

    Well, when you get a question like if the short term debt of $100,000 should be classified as short term or long term debt in year 1….later determined in year 2 that the debt was being refinanced as long term. Then you are wrong if you stated short term. Lol, does not seem logical.

    AUD - Passed:)
    FAR - Passed:)
    REG - Retake TBD
    BEC - Missed by 3 points Retake TBD

    #301258
    Yvonne570
    Member

    Lower cost or market – IFRS owns this and is so much easier than US GAAP:

    US GAAP: considers net realize value (ceiling)/

    net margin (floor)

    ***if replacement cost is higher than floor, then compare with cost to determine which lower method

    ****If replacement cost is lower than floor, then replace this with the floor to compare with cost record lower method.

    IFRS considers only Net realize value vs cost — lower one used (easy)

    AUD - Passed:)
    FAR - Passed:)
    REG - Retake TBD
    BEC - Missed by 3 points Retake TBD

    #301259
    happy75
    Participant

    I'm learning a lot in this thread.

    Good work!

    Keep it coming. 🙂

    #301260
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Let's not forget no Extraordinary items reported.

    The Cash Flow Statement is easier to understand and nonmonetary exchanges (Similar vs. Disimilar assets is a piece of cake to remember)

Viewing 5 replies - 1 through 5 (of 5 total)
  • The topic ‘Sometimes IFRS makes more sense than GAAP’ is closed to new replies.