Nonreciprocal transfer of an asset- can someone dumb this down for me?

  • Creator
    Topic
  • #176896
    MustPass1988
    Member

    I just came across this question on the Wiley test bank in the Fixed Asset section and it’s not making sense to me.

    When the FV is determinable, a nonreciprocal transfer of a nonmonetary asset to another entity should be recorded at the:

    Answer) FV of the asset transferred, and a gain or loss should be recognized on the disposition of an asset

    I took “nonreciprocal” to mean that the exchange lacked commercial substance, therefore it should be recorded at the lower of 1) FV given up + cash paid 2) FV received 3) BCV given up + cash paid.

    AUD: PASSED [81]; Expired, retaking August 23rd
    BEC: PASSED [83]; Expired, retaking July 11th
    REG: PASSED [83]
    FAR: FAILED [64]; Retaking May 23rd

Viewing 1 replies (of 1 total)
  • Author
    Replies
  • #407906
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    I think the transaction do have commercial substance because the exchange was non-reciprocal, meaning that the economic position of the company had change

    The asset should be recorded at its FV and a gain or loss recognize at that moment

    If it was a reciprocal exchange, then it would had lacked commercial substance because the company would be in the same position than before the transfer

Viewing 1 replies (of 1 total)
  • The topic ‘Nonreciprocal transfer of an asset- can someone dumb this down for me?’ is closed to new replies.